Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
0 user currently in Basket Case.
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Basket Case - Microsoft...being Microsoft, yet again | | Thread closed
Pages: 1 2 3Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
Karadur

Fire Snake



Level: 48

Posts: 1077/1192
EXP: 786444
For next: 37099

Since: 11-02-04
From: Chatham, Ontario, Canada

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 15 hours
Posted on 08-19-05 09:34 PM Link
Originally posted by HyperHacker
So... Taking bets on how many days hours it takes for hackers to add a hard drive to the Core system when it's released.


I don't know how long it usually takes, but as a blind guess, I'll say 12 hours at most, provided they devote all their time to it.

As for the price itself, that's way too high if you ask me. The only way I can see they'd even think of making an intital price that high is if it can do a whole lot more than just play games, out of the box. By that, I know that the XBox can play DVDs, but you need to buy the attachment and remote control. For the XBox 360, maybe it'll be able to do the same without having to buy anything extra.

I know my friend Josh reserved one at EB Games (that cost $50 alone), so it's obvious he really wants it. I don't know which package he plans on going for, although knowing him, it'll be the more expensive one. So far though, the only games he's looking forward to are Halo 3 and Perfect Dark Zero I suppose having two games to look forward to is better than none

I had no plans to get one of these, even before hearing the initial price, but now that this news has come out, I'm even more glad I made that decision

I guess the only thing we can hope for right now is a price drop after it's been out for a decent amount of time, but who knows what sales are going to be like when it is released?
witeasprinwow

Lakitu
Level: 37

Posts: 550/555
EXP: 319587
For next: 18666

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 55 days
Last activity: 55 days
Posted on 08-20-05 12:41 AM Link
Before you guys go making claims about how outrageous the price is, remember that Microsoft is eating money on each of these.

I intend to buy one a while after it comes out, especially if I can't get TES4: Oblivion to run on my computer at a decent framerate. It'd cost some $400 to upgrade my PC anyways. Nintendo might change my mind with the Revolution, but it's still so secretive that I can't make an any sort of prediction about it. I think I'm through with Sony; Anyone who talks about Microsoft being money whores hasn't looked at what Sony has done to thier consumers over the years. Did MIcrosoft ever release a $300 piece of hardware that has a serious malfunction and have the audacity to call that malfunction a "feature"? (In reference to the PSP's square button, in case you didn't pick that up)

And only fucking idiots use the term "Micro$oft."

Originally posted by Shadow Red
Bah, who wants to spend alot of money on systems anyways.

I mean their target age group (teens) have alot of payments. Car payments, insurance, college money..I mean really.

Unless you have some generous parents hopefully youll be spending that money on some more worthwhile things.


In reference to the bolded part:

How the hell do you think console companies stay alive today? None of them are really specifically targeting anyone over the age of 30. Over half of that age range will be financially dependant on thier parents.

Also, anyone who says Xbox is worthless obviously didn't get to play 16-player Halo 2 in a dorm. Maybe not worth the original $300 asking price, but once the price dopped it was worth the cash.

Edit: There's an interesting article over at 1up.com about Micrsoft in the Japanese market. read it.


(edited by witeasprinwow on 08-19-05 04:49 PM)
(edited by witeasprinwow on 08-19-05 04:49 PM)
Xeolord

- B l u e s -
Power Metal > All
Level: 81

Posts: 3122/3418
EXP: 4884196
For next: 108653

Since: 03-15-04
From: Yeah

Since last post: 15 hours
Last activity: 15 hours
Posted on 08-20-05 04:36 AM Link
All there $100 plus deal is is just added accessories and stuff like that, not exacly "another model" of the system, from what I've heard ...

I could careless. Honestly this console bashing has gotten pretty old. I'm am an owner of an Xbox, Gamecube, and PS2. Guess what, I like them all!

I'm buying a 360 because Live will be great. There's Perfect Dark Zero, you can play mp3's during any game whenever you want, there's great launch titles like Gears of War and so on. And it's also going to be at a reasonable price.

From what I've heard the PS2 could be as much as $500.

But again, do I care? No. Because in maybe 3-4 years or so, I'll probably be an owner of a 360, PS3, and Revolution, and will more than likely be playing them all reguraly.

Consoles mean nothing, games do.
witeasprinwow

Lakitu
Level: 37

Posts: 551/555
EXP: 319587
For next: 18666

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 55 days
Last activity: 55 days
Posted on 08-20-05 07:08 AM Link
Originally posted by Colleen
Here's the thing though... the top-end model is basically the console + the HD with everything else added in free price-wise. So the idea of just selling the HD for $99... boggles the mind. I thought 20GB HD's were... well... DIRT CHEAP.


Missed this the first time through... Colleen, you either misstated something, or you're looking at it incredibly unfairly. If you only look at the 20GB HD and judge the cost increase on that addition alone, then of course it's going to look like a rip-off. Read again: "...and a souped-up $399 version that ships with a 20GB hard drive, a wireless controller, a wireless headset, a limited-edition wireless Media Center remote, and HD-capable component A/V cables." Still a bit pricy, but not nearly as ridiculous as just the HD for $100.

Also, another thing I noticed: The guy at C.net says there's no launch titles, when, in fact, there are titles scheduled for the launch date. Xeolord just mentioned one of them. That's what you get for taking advice from C.net, I guess.

EDIT: In fact, I just found a list of games that are supposed to be launch titles. As the article says, the list is a bit out of date, as some of those games had to be delayed... But I do remember reading that FFXI, Oblivion, Madden 06, Dead or Alive 4, and Perfect Dark Zero were all scheduled for launch.


(edited by witeasprinwow on 08-19-05 10:11 PM)
fabio

Chuck
Level: 45

Posts: 801/1479
EXP: 629903
For next: 30261

Since: 07-02-05
From: Somewhere in Texas

Since last post: 7 hours
Last activity: 7 hours
Posted on 08-20-05 07:12 AM Link
Wow, that's a lot of money. Of course, I'll have to pay it on layaway just like I did with my GBA, DS, GC, and PS2.

Originally posted by Xeolord
From what I've heard the PS2 could be as much as $500.


You mean the PS3 will cost $500 right? The PS2 is already out.
Koneko

Flurry
Level: 21

Posts: 108/256
EXP: 49237
For next: 706

Since: 06-11-05
From: Tartarus, tartarus, tartarus

Since last post: 9 hours
Last activity: 8 hours
Posted on 08-20-05 07:38 AM Link
Why does anyone think that there won't be any games to launch on the same day as the 360? The article said there were not any set launch titles. That means they haven't decided yet which games will be released packaged with the 360 or available in such packages.

sigh.

And I would put my own personal thoughts here, but it's quicker to just tell you to read Xeolord's post and pretend it's in this big spot here.
witeasprinwow

Lakitu
Level: 37

Posts: 552/555
EXP: 319587
For next: 18666

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 55 days
Last activity: 55 days
Posted on 08-20-05 08:40 AM Link
Originally posted by Koneko
Why does anyone think that there won't be any games to launch on the same day as the 360? The article said there were not any set launch titles. That means they haven't decided yet which games will be released packaged with the 360 or available in such packages.


Is this what he means by "set"? If so, I'm relieved that he isn't as igorant as I thought him to be, but still somewhat confused over his choice of words.
NSNick
Laidback Admin
Level: 85

Posts: 3456/3875
EXP: 5895841
For next: 2699

Since: 03-15-04
From: North Side
School: OSU


Since last post: 9 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 08-20-05 09:00 AM Link
People will buy this regardless of launch titles. Remember one of PS2's most popular launch titles? Fantavision. Yeah...
windwaker

Ball and Chain Trooper
WHY ALL THE MAYONNAISE HATE
Level: 61

Posts: 1752/1797
EXP: 1860597
For next: 15999

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 6 days
Posted on 08-20-05 10:39 AM Link
Originally posted by Yoshi Dude
Originally posted by DarkSlaya
but they FUCKING DON'T HAVE A LAUNCH TITLE.

I don't buy something for it's specs, I buy it for the games, d'uh!
Yeah, it's the games that matter. Not the console itself, and not who makes it.

I don't see why this has to be a "Microsoft is evil" topic. Do you think Nintendo and Sony don't care about money?


I personally think that Sony/Nintendo care more about quality than MS. They all care about money, just with different ideals (crap for more vs. quality for more).
HyperLamer
<||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people

Sesshomaru
Tamaranian

Level: 118

Posts: 6423/8210
EXP: 18171887
For next: 211027

Since: 03-15-04
From: Canada, w00t!
LOL FAD

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 08-21-05 01:29 AM Link
Well it's all about their consumer trends. Nintendo's main consumer is kids, so they try to make their consoles cheap and durable and their games simple but fun. Sony's sales come mostly from the brand name and their consoles' ability to do pretty much whatever, and of course their long, complex RPGs. (They do seem to suck at hardware quality, though, but it usually gets better with later revisions.) Microsoft's main selling point is that the Xbox is great for parties - holds tons of music, and has a lot of multiplayer games. Xbox's durability takes a hit, however, because it's so expensive to make they actually lose money on it. (They make it up in game sales.)
witeasprinwow

Lakitu
Level: 37

Posts: 553/555
EXP: 319587
For next: 18666

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 55 days
Last activity: 55 days
Posted on 08-21-05 11:41 AM Link
Originally posted by windwaker
I personally think that Sony/Nintendo care more about quality than MS. They all care about money, just with different ideals (crap for more vs. quality for more).


Sony cares more about quality? Keep in mind that Sony has nothing to do with the development of a large majority of the games that are released for thier consoles (Same with Microsoft, except for Bungie and Rare); They simply produce the hardware needed for those games. PS1 was relatively well-made, but both PS2s and PSPs have had severe flaws (PS2 with the lens and the fact that they marketed a vertical stand that actually damaged the system; PSP with the square button getting blocked by the screen) that have made the systems at least flawed and, in some cases, totally useless.

Nintendo might seem to care more about making sure they have quality games, but since very few people were making 3rd party games for the GC and almost none for the N64, it's probably because they HAVE to make quality games themselves to ensure the success of thier consoles.

Originally posted by HyperHacker
Well it's all about their consumer trends. Nintendo's main consumer is kids, so they try to make their consoles cheap and durable and their games simple but fun. Sony's sales come mostly from the brand name and their consoles' ability to do pretty much whatever, and of course their long, complex RPGs. (They do seem to suck at hardware quality, though, but it usually gets better with later revisions.) Microsoft's main selling point is that the Xbox is great for parties - holds tons of music, and has a lot of multiplayer games. Xbox's durability takes a hit, however, because it's so expensive to make they actually lose money on it. (They make it up in game sales.)


Hyper, I'm willing to bet that if Sony and Nintendo weren't losing money on GC / PS2, then they were just barely above breaking even. I'd also be willing to bet that all 3 companies will be eating money on thier next consoles. It's inevitable; They can't keep raising the price or they'll lose thier edge over PC gaming.
Yoronosuku

Bullet Bill
YORO 4 GOD
Level: 32

Posts: 318/502
EXP: 194954
For next: 11488

Since: 01-06-05
From: hailing from Oyamazaki, Kyoto

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 08-22-05 05:02 AM Link
I personaly think that every single feature that is hyped about this new XBox is a feature i could get by playing a game for my PC. Online? Headsets? MP3 playing? I am not trashing the system at all! I am just saying that for this kind of money (which, I don't exactly have), I do not have a practicle use for this kind of a system. But that does not mean I think it 'sucks' or is a bad system! Just not the right one for me.
HyperLamer
<||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people

Sesshomaru
Tamaranian

Level: 118

Posts: 6518/8210
EXP: 18171887
For next: 211027

Since: 03-15-04
From: Canada, w00t!
LOL FAD

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 08-23-05 12:12 PM Link
Yeah, the only real reason to get any game system instead of just buying PC games is to play the games that don't have PC versions. You gotta admit, the features are nice, even if it's practically the same as a PC. Now, if every good game that comes out for a given system also comes out on PC, then you might want to re-think your purchase.

But of course, keep in mind that upgrading a PC every 2 months to play the latest games can get expensive, while a game console usually lasts a good 5 years or so. PC games are designed to be as realistic as possible, to the point where the PC is designed for the game, while console games are designed to work within the console's specifications (and maybe an add-on or two) until said specs are considered crappy compared to competition or games have to be significantly stripped down.
Originally posted by witeasprinwowPS1 was relatively well-made

Didn't the first models overheat?


I'm willing to bet that if Sony and Nintendo weren't losing money on GC / PS2, then they were just barely above breaking even.

Probably, but the loss, if any, wasn't as significant as Microsoft's. Particularly in Nintendo's case since they make all their own parts; Sony I don't know so much about.
NSNick
Laidback Admin
Level: 85

Posts: 3501/3875
EXP: 5895841
For next: 2699

Since: 03-15-04
From: North Side
School: OSU


Since last post: 9 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 08-23-05 12:52 PM Link
Nintendo doesn't make all of their own parts. I know IBM makes the Gekko and ATI makes the Flipper.
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 5173/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 08-23-05 09:53 PM Link
And the casing is made externally. In fact, none of the companies make "their own parts". They sell the finished product.
Riku

Giant Goomba
Level: 42

Posts: 562/1239
EXP: 505941
For next: 15421

Since: 06-21-05
From: ....Is this like a custom title?

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 6 hours
Posted on 08-24-05 03:35 AM Link
GBA to NDS. Huge upgrade.

PS2 to PS3. Supposed to be huge.

X-box to X-box 360. I heard this was just a minor upgrade.

Damn..... Microsoft, here me now! Focus on your computers, now your dumbass systems!
kitty
Come on babe, pet the pussy ;)
Level: 70

Posts: 1892/2449
EXP: 2962406
For next: 53405

Since: 03-15-04
From: Scranton, PA, USA

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 08-24-05 07:43 AM Link
Originally posted by Lenophis
The X-Box 360 will leave you wondering "wtf?!" Microsoft is really pulling out all of the fucktard stops this time around.
But of course, I'm not surprised at all in their stupidity.
Originally posted by Ice Man
Agreed, Micro$oft sux big ass. They only want the money, all other things aren't important for them.
Originally posted by Xell
I don't like Micro$oft so i use Linux and it works fantastic
Originally posted by MarioMaster
X-box to X-box 360. I heard this was just a minor upgrade.
Just the kind of things you expect from a typical Nintendo fanboy on a forum that has more pro-Nintendo nuts than Nintendo Power.

You're all either really biased or really stupid. You can pick which one it is. Try to look at things fairly. See, the Nintendo GS is a poorly made piece of shit. As is the PSP with its inherent design flaw. It's not like we have a company that NEVER DOES ANYTHING WRONG (HELLO? CARTRIDGES ON THE N64? WTF WERE YOU THINKING?) versus this big evil corporate empire called M$.

See, if Microsoft wasn't so FUCKING GOOD at what they do, then they wouldn't be around. You can only make money in today's society if you sell things REALLY CHEAP, or sell things REALLY GOOD. And Microsoft products are hardly cheap. They must be making money SOMEHOW. If only you know-it-all fanboys could figure out why!


(edited by Yiffy Kitten on 08-23-05 10:44 PM)
Ronin

Bot
Level: 20

Posts: 34/267
EXP: 37090
For next: 5349

Since: 08-22-05

Since last post: 10 days
Last activity: 4 days
Posted on 08-24-05 07:56 AM Link
Actually, Microsoft pretty much got lucky by picking up Halo.

From what I've heard, they didn't even start Halo, but they pretty much picked a lot of it up, give it a little bit of polish, and that was about it.

And basically, the big "WHOAMG SHOOTER" guys picked up on it, then they bought a bunch of crap for their Xbox, so they wouldn't have to buy other games for other systems.

Basically, it WAS a question of launch titles or very-close-to -launch. Microsoft just got a big one, and rode with it.

But still, a hundred bucks for a hard drive? I guess they have to cash in SOMEwhere.
Colleen
Administrator
Level: 136

Posts: 10081/11302
EXP: 29369328
For next: 727587

Since: 03-15-04
From: LaSalle, Quebec, Canada

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 08-24-05 07:57 AM Link
I saw Halo previewed in an issue of PC Gamer back when it was a PC exclusive title.

How things change, huh? Wonder what the "big" Xbox title would be if Halo never was released for it...
O.G.

Metal axe
Level: 22

Posts: 144/169
EXP: 53507
For next: 4843

Since: 03-19-04

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 2 days
Posted on 08-24-05 08:34 AM Link
why complain about it you know your going to get one anyways,
and i cant remember exactly, but i dont think it was Microsoft trying to sell connectivity to the GBA, wich required a $15 cord, and a $30 game for the GBA, and the $50 game...
Pages: 1 2 3Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Basket Case - Microsoft...being Microsoft, yet again | | Thread closed


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.008 seconds.