Originally posted by The Sage Of Time

---

Originally posted by Zer0wned

---

Are you encouraging pedophiles? I used to know one, he convinced pre and barely pubescent girls to mess around with him, he said they liked it. Consenting or not, liked it or not, that can have serious negative repercussions in the future. Persuasion, tricking, guilting, or even scare tactics can be passed off as "consent" if done correctly. I know how at least this one works because I got to know him and got inside his head.

---

Alright, one thing here.. There is a big difference between those two things. A big difference between consent and liking it, and being tricked\scare tacticed into it and not. The latter is rape, plain and freaking simple, the former is not. You cannot say the latter can be passed off as consent, it cannot be.. Yea, some people bottle up such encounters, get screwed up in the head, but so do ANY rape victims, no matter the age.

The former is a matter of choice, and if both parties are fine with it and enjoy it, I don't see the problem. Society is messed up, we see certain pairings as "wrong" and such, this is why gay people have such a hard time, for lack of a better example.. Age means very little in this, it's just the younger you are the more vulnerable you are to rape, this is undeniably true.. But you cannot generalize a sexual preference (Gay, Pedophile, Whatever) and make everyone out to be monsters for it, it just does not work that way.. But it's only the people who rape, who cause damage and do crap like that who get any attention, they are the ones that show up in the media, that give everyone a skewed impression.

As far as I have ever seen, Pedophile -for example- is not wrong. It is a preference, a biological uncontrollable preference, just like Gay, Straight, Bi, or anything else.. The problem people have with it, is they automatically thing Pedophile = Child Molester\Raper. That is as ridiculous as saying Gay = AIDS\Disgusting Sodomy\Whatever. You cannot bundle it up like that.. It does not work that way.

Yea, be defensive if you want when you (anyone) respond, but if you can come up with a valid point against this without using "sicko" or any variation of that word, or without expressing disgust in your opinion of it.. Then I sure do welcome the argument. I have yet to see anyone manage it, because what I said is true. (Also, before you jump on maturity, keep in mind that everyones maturity is different. You cannot generalize any age as mature. And you shouldn't be the one to decide for someone what is "mature enough" when it comes to sex. As long as the sex is done in safe practice, and both parties welcome it, that should be that.)

Just remember that most people don't have a choice with their sexual preference. If you are straight, you won't like the same sex, the thought of it is probably disgusting or unappealing. If you are gay you probably won't like the opposite sex much, and find it highly unattractive.. In the same case, if you're classified a Pedophile, you're probably not attracted to older people much. (The age range in this case, varies a bit, but usually stays within a preteen-youngteen area.) I'll also add, people become sexually active at a young age, 11-13 range, I find it funny people have tried to repress this over the years, failing miserably and only causing more problems. I know for a "fact" that people are sexually interested even before then, too.. Though to a much, much lesser extent. (Sexual enjoyment is possible at a younger age, though perhaps less feasible to stimulate or consent to. Not something I want to get into anyway as I have little knowledge in it outside of my own childhood.)

What is the point of saying that last bit? Just another final example. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's wrong, sick, and should be outlawed. No disagreements here however, that some people -in all sexual preferences- are bastards for what they do to other people and deserve the full extent of the law on them, no disagreements there at all.

---

Originally posted by windwaker

---

It\\\\\\\'s still better than microsoft. =D

---

Originally posted by windwaker

---

You have no argument.

---

Originally posted by windwaker

---

Die now, and stop increasing your postcount through empty headed flames.

---

Originally posted by windwaker

---

I must be the only person who thinks ErkDog isn\\\\\\\'t saying use LunarPages.
You\\\\\\\'re registered on: 06-28-05.
You have no clue what he\\\\\\\'s talking about.

---

Originally posted by Trapster

---

How about your interests, Kitten Yiffer? You like to fuck cats.

---

Originally posted by HyperHacker

---

...2GB costs $186, and 4GB costs $1029?

200 bucks for a 2GB iPod, that's pretty nice. But which iPod?

---

Originally posted by Danielle

---

Neither of you are funny. And if you don't fix the link to give this thread a purpose, then it will be closed. So I suggest fixing that, and starting a conversation or something. Running a fever isn't a conversation.

---