Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
0 user currently in Hardware/Software.
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Hardware/Software - Window Manager | |
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
What is your preferred window manager?
This doesn't apply to Windows users, but to most other operating system users.
kwin (KDE)
 
23.1%, 3 votes
Nautalis (GNOME)
 
23.1%, 3 votes
*box (please specify)   0.0%, 0 vote
FVWM
 
7.7%, 1 vote
Enlightenment   0.0%, 0 vote
WindowMaker   0.0%, 0 vote
Other (specify)
 
15.4%, 2 votes
My OS doesn't let me do that (for those that have to answer in polls)
 
23.1%, 3 votes
My OS hides the option, but I use the default anyway
 
7.7%, 1 vote
Multi-voting is enabled.

User Post
FreeDOS

Lava Lotus
Wannabe-Mod :<
Level: 59

Posts: 1075/1657
EXP: 1648646
For next: 24482

Since: 03-15-04
From: Seattle

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 02-09-05 04:43 AM Link | Quote
Personally, I love FVWM for it's flexibility and perfectness once it's tweaked to perfection.
Tarale
I'm not under the alfluence of incohol like some thinkle peop I am. It's just the drunker I sit here the longer I get.

Level: 73

Posts: 1274/2720
EXP: 3458036
For next: 27832

Since: 03-18-04
From: Adelaide, Australia

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 02-09-05 05:57 AM Link | Quote
When I use Linux, I use Gnome.
Rydain

Ropa
Blaze Phoenix
Runs With the Dragon Within

Level: 42

Posts: 456/738
EXP: 490056
For next: 31306

Since: 03-15-04
From: State College, PA

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 8 hours
Posted on 02-09-05 06:57 AM Link | Quote
I first tried Enlightenment about three years ago because KDE was behaving weirdly on my computer for some reason and I felt like giving an unusual desktop environment a shot. After a few days of getting used to its minimalistic style, I realized that I vastly preferred said style to the taskbar + desktop icons paradigm of KDE and Gnome. I like to scatter windows around on multiple virtual desktops, which covers up desktop icons (and therefore makes them more annoying than useful because I don't want to have to go hunting for them under windows). I don't need a taskbar telling me where everything is all the time. I do like a place to put minimized windows, but an iconbox works better for that because it's small and inobtrusive. Enlightenment's application menu, which you click on the background to access, made sense to me because I could bring it up pretty much anywhere instead of having to click on a "Start" button every time and it only appeared when I needed it.

The one aspect of Enlightenment that got on my nerves was its lack of antialiased fonts. When I heard about Xfce, which is built with GTK2 but can be configured to behave much like Enlightenment, I gave it a shot, and it's now my window manager of choice. The main differences I notice between it and Enlightenment are that it has a launcher panel and its pagers aren't quite as fancy. At first, I didn't particularly care for the launcher panel, but now I like it because it basically consolidates the functionality of pagers and the Epplets I used to run. It's very customizable, so I didn't have any trouble getting it into an inobtrusive configuration that I find useful. As far as the pagers go, they still let you drag windows from one desktop to another, but you can't reposition them with the pager. They snap to whatever position they had before you moved them. For example, if you drag a window in the upper righthand corner of one desktop, it will always wind up in the upper righthand corner of wherever you moved it to. Honestly, this has never inconvenienced me and I can see how people might prefer the pagers to behave in this way, but it would be nice to have the ability to reposition windows using pagers if you wished to do so.
Cellar Dweller

Flurry
!!!
Level: 27

Posts: 204/269
EXP: 107817
For next: 8342

Since: 03-15-04
From: Arkansas

Since last post: 16 days
Last activity: 34 min.
Posted on 02-09-05 08:07 AM Link | Quote
I use the version of IceWM that is distributed with Debian stable. It's small and fast, so it works well in my main computer: a 233 MHz PII.
neotransotaku

Baby Mario
戻れたら、
誰も気が付く
Level: 87

Posts: 2081/4016
EXP: 6220548
For next: 172226

Since: 03-15-04
From: Outside of Time/Space

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 02-09-05 09:51 AM Link | Quote
When I use Solaris at school, I use Gnome. Open windows is blah and Common Desktop Manager doesn't have much functionality besides multiple workspaces.
FreeDOS

Lava Lotus
Wannabe-Mod :<
Level: 59

Posts: 1082/1657
EXP: 1648646
For next: 24482

Since: 03-15-04
From: Seattle

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 02-10-05 02:34 AM Link | Quote
I think you mean Common Desktop Environment (CDE)... I don't like it because it acts like Windows 3.1 except for the focusing style.
neotransotaku

Baby Mario
戻れたら、
誰も気が付く
Level: 87

Posts: 2102/4016
EXP: 6220548
For next: 172226

Since: 03-15-04
From: Outside of Time/Space

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 02-10-05 02:47 AM Link | Quote
yeah, that's what I meant, CDE... 3.1 feel eh...that's true. Although, when you iconify, I can't seem to find it again...
Banedon

Giant Red Paratroopa
Level: 55

Posts: 895/1408
EXP: 1291380
For next: 22809

Since: 03-15-04
From: Michigan

Since last post: 101 days
Last activity: 90 days
Posted on 02-10-05 02:54 AM Link | Quote
I use Gnome, because that's what came with my Linux distrobution.
Vystrix Nexoth

Level: 30

Posts: 264/348
EXP: 158678
For next: 7191

Since: 03-15-04
From: somewhere between anima and animus

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 2 days
Posted on 02-10-05 03:51 AM Link | Quote
I go with KDE, though I've used GNOME and Fluxbox. I don't really care much for GNOME, though I can't quite put my finger on why. It just doesn't feel as cohesive as KDE does.

As for Fluxbox, I used that as my primary desktop environment for a while... it is by far the quickest of the three, and like being able to group windows, though I don't like its reliance on dockapps to confer more information than what windows are open (like, what time it is) or on always having desktop space visible in order to summon the program menu.

Still, I'll take GNOME and Fluxbox over Windows any day of the week and twice on Thursdays. Though if given a choice I'll stick with KDE.
Jesper
Busy, busy, busy.
Level: 69

Posts: 1938/2390
EXP: 2856000
For next: 13743

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden.

Since last post: 176 days
Last activity: 79 days
Posted on 02-10-05 09:43 PM Link | Quote
Where's the "My OS does let me do it inofficially, but I prefer the native Window Manager anyway" option? (OS X )
FreeDOS

Lava Lotus
Wannabe-Mod :<
Level: 59

Posts: 1088/1657
EXP: 1648646
For next: 24482

Since: 03-15-04
From: Seattle

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 02-11-05 02:40 AM Link | Quote
Add'd. Edit Poll is great, isn't it?
Tarale
I'm not under the alfluence of incohol like some thinkle peop I am. It's just the drunker I sit here the longer I get.

Level: 73

Posts: 1311/2720
EXP: 3458036
For next: 27832

Since: 03-18-04
From: Adelaide, Australia

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 02-11-05 02:46 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Jesper
Where's the "My OS does let me do it inofficially, but I prefer the native Window Manager anyway" option? (OS X )


I like the native Window Manager in OS X too.

But I do enjoy skinning it on occasion
FreeDOS

Lava Lotus
Wannabe-Mod :<
Level: 59

Posts: 1091/1657
EXP: 1648646
For next: 24482

Since: 03-15-04
From: Seattle

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 02-11-05 02:47 AM Link | Quote
Mind you, skinning is NOT the same as changing window managers. Windows users can't come in here saying "I use WindowBlinds (or the UXTheme patch)". That's just changing how it looks, not how it manages windows.
Tarale
I'm not under the alfluence of incohol like some thinkle peop I am. It's just the drunker I sit here the longer I get.

Level: 73

Posts: 1313/2720
EXP: 3458036
For next: 27832

Since: 03-18-04
From: Adelaide, Australia

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 02-11-05 03:00 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by FreeDOS
Mind you, skinning is NOT the same as changing window managers. Windows users can't come in here saying "I use WindowBlinds (or the UXTheme patch)". That's just changing how it looks, not how it manages windows.


I know that. I just wanted to mention skinning anyways, cause it's teh fun.

I can't change the way my OS X windows work, but I can make it as shiny or as matt or as purple or whatever as I like. Different, but still fun.
Kitten Yiffer

Purple wand
Furry moderator
Vivent l'exp����¯�¿�½������©rience de signalisation d'amusement, ou bien !
Level: 135

Posts: 7796/11162
EXP: 28824106
For next: 510899

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 4 min.
Posted on 02-11-05 03:02 AM Link | Quote
Can anyone name me a Windows manager that don't waste 49749848 resources as soon I use it?

...hell, I just want a simple distro to screw around with. Fedora core is like Win XP in the bloat department. I want a light distro. With light stuff...
FreeDOS

Lava Lotus
Wannabe-Mod :<
Level: 59

Posts: 1092/1657
EXP: 1648646
For next: 24482

Since: 03-15-04
From: Seattle

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 02-11-05 03:12 AM Link | Quote
I like Slackware, but it's not for people that know nothing, like Red Hat or Fedora. I use FVWM, it's very lightweight and has enough things to look and act like anything you want it to be. Want a Windows 95 look? No problem. WinXP (Luna)? No problem. Mac OS X? No problem. KDE look? No problem.

anyway... yes.
HyperLamer
<||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people

Sesshomaru
Tamaranian

Level: 118

Posts: 3199/8210
EXP: 18171887
For next: 211027

Since: 03-15-04
From: Canada, w00t!
LOL FAD

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 02-12-05 04:12 AM Link | Quote
Every OS I've seen except the various Mac ones use a taskbar... What other sorts of systems are popular? It could be neat to use something different.
FreeDOS

Lava Lotus
Wannabe-Mod :<
Level: 59

Posts: 1095/1657
EXP: 1648646
For next: 24482

Since: 03-15-04
From: Seattle

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 02-12-05 04:15 AM Link | Quote
Program Manager (yuck)

There's a dock thing that's in Mac OS X and CDE (various Unices, like Solaris) and XFCE.
Jesper
Busy, busy, busy.
Level: 69

Posts: 1947/2390
EXP: 2856000
For next: 13743

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden.

Since last post: 176 days
Last activity: 79 days
Posted on 02-12-05 05:32 AM Link | Quote
The closest thing for -window- management is Expos
Rydain

Ropa
Blaze Phoenix
Runs With the Dragon Within

Level: 42

Posts: 463/738
EXP: 490056
For next: 31306

Since: 03-15-04
From: State College, PA

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 8 hours
Posted on 02-12-05 07:07 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by HyperHacker
Every OS I've seen except the various Mac ones use a taskbar... What other sorts of systems are popular? It could be neat to use something different.


Windows taskbar functionality falls into multiple categories and many of the alternative interface styles use different features to handle each, so I'll address the types of functionality separately.

Launching applications

Root menu - This menu appears when you click on the desktop. Enlightenment, Xfce, and Blackbox have this. (It's probably in other minimalist window managers as well.) Enlightenment and Xfce's can be hierarchical like the Windows Start menu. (Blackbox's probably has that feature too, but I've never messed around with it, just seen Rando use it.)

Dock-like icons - You can put these on Xfce's launcher panel. Each icon can have an optional popup menu attached to it, which can be a helpful space saver. For instance, you can put your browser, email client, LiveJournal client, etc. underneath a single INTARWEB icon.

Hiding and keeping track of windows

Loads o' desktop space - This and a taskbar are not mutually exclusive, but I'm going to mention it anyway because it gives you options for managing your stuff that can make a taskbar less important (or, in my case, just plain useless). At work, I find that the Windows 2000 taskbar is essential because I usually have a buttload of stuff full-screened and it all overlaps, so it's easiest to click on an item in the taskbar when I need to bring it to the front instead of trying to dig it out from underneath a bunch of other crap. With four desktops on my home machine, I have plenty of space to spread out applications that take up tons of screen real estate. For instance, Firefox is on my main desktop, and I have a text editor on the second and Gimp on the third. I know where everything is, so instead of using a taskbar to get to various applications, I just switch desktops.

Iconbox - Think of this as a storage chest for your windows. You put things in the box and then retrieve them when you want to use them again. Enlightenment has one by default. Xfce has an optional one (which can also function in a more taskbar-ish sense if you tell it to show all open applications - I don't do this because I don't need to know where everything is at all times).

Menu - In Blackbox, when you hide a window, it disappears, and you select it from a menu to get it back.
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Hardware/Software - Window Manager | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.013 seconds.