Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
0 user currently in World Affairs / Debate.
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - World Affairs / Debate - Ethics: Does the End Justify the Means? | |
Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Ethics: Does the End Justify the Means?
You can
Yes
 
12.5%, 1 vote
No
 
87.5%, 7 votes
Multi-voting is disabled.

User Post
BookReader

Ninji
Level: 25

Posts: 197/232
EXP: 86317
For next: 3303

Since: 03-15-04
From: Albuquerque, New Mexico (Land of Disenchantment)

Since last post: 22 days
Last activity: 2 days
Posted on 01-25-05 09:58 PM Link | Quote
Ethics: Does the End Justify the Means?

Right, so, generally I
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 2616/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 01-25-05 10:06 PM Link | Quote
Example A:

Marijuana causes people to become intoxicated.
Solution: Prohibit substance
Consequence: Black market is created
Problem: Shut down black market
Solution: "War on Drugs"
Consequence: Thousands of lost lives
Therefore: End is not justified by the means

Example B:

US Handhold on South/Latin America weakening
Solution: Implace dictator in Chile, arm nation
Consequence: Pinochet is put into power
Problem: Pinochet is brutal dictator
Solution: Move away from Chile
Consequence: New dictators are implaced (Noriega, etc.) and South/Latin America further deteriorates
Therefore: The loss of life outweighs all benefits. End is not justified by means

Those are just two good examples.
Steak

Zora
Level: 35

Posts: 350/507
EXP: 278751
For next: 1185

Since: 03-16-04
From: Ohio University

Since last post: 195 days
Last activity: 195 days
Posted on 01-25-05 11:57 PM Link | Quote
The means justify the means. How one goes about a problem is ultimately more important than the goal in mind.
Silvershield

Slime
Level: 30

Posts: 322/345
EXP: 153029
For next: 12840

Since: 04-11-04
From: New Jersey

Since last post: 60 days
Last activity: 6 hours
Posted on 01-26-05 03:36 AM Link | Quote
The question is quite easy to oversimplify, so I'd approach it with caution. In a general sense, it is fair enough to say that the end should not justify the means; however, in practice, such encompassing logic cannot be used. Certainly there is some end that must be achieved, regardless of the means required.

In your example, BookReader, planting a bomb is definitely justifiable if it takes fewer lives than the other option would. However, that assumes that no third path is available. Hopefully, there is another means through which the end can be accomplished, making the complete preservation of life an ideal outcome.


(edited by Silvershield on 01-26-05 12:09 AM)
MathOnNapkins

Math n' Hacks
Level: 67

Posts: 1325/2189
EXP: 2495887
For next: 96985

Since: 03-18-04
From: Base Tourian

Since last post: 1 hour
Last activity: 32 min.
Posted on 01-26-05 06:40 AM Link | Quote
I dunno, I don't really like to argue questions like this. B/c if the means is diametrically opposed to the end, how can it be justifiable? You can still do things without a proper justification. If you had to kill 1000 innocent people to stop a nuclear disaster that would kill many times more people, you would still do it, right? But I'm sure you wouldn't feel great about it. And you'd have some splaining to do. And you'd definitely question if there was an easier way...
Apple

Kodondo
Level: 38

Posts: 575/594
EXP: 350163
For next: 20284

Since: 03-27-04
From: Washington.

Since last post: 264 days
Last activity: 152 days
Posted on 01-26-05 01:47 PM Link | Quote
Bombing the airport...

500 or people die instead of 3000
Less property damage

Would of been better? Yeah, it seems like it but the negative respones that the goverment would of received has the possible to end up alot worse than a few thousand lives lost. They could blame it on terrorists but it wouldn't really stop them from trying it again somewhere else before the goverment can try and inplace all the sercuity systems.

You could issue a grounding of all planes and stop the hijackings before they started, prevented the explosion and loss of innocent lives. Would of been alot better looking as well.

If the planes did manage to take off. Shoot them down with jet fighters.



But to answer the question. The end very rarely justify the means.
Kitten Yiffer

Purple wand
Furry moderator
Vivent l'exp����¯�¿�½������©rience de signalisation d'amusement, ou bien !
Level: 135

Posts: 7410/11162
EXP: 28824106
For next: 510899

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 4 min.
Posted on 01-26-05 09:09 PM Link | Quote
I'm taking this a step furter but... there is a chanche that someone set off that bomb. Such as an terrorist. Killing alot of lives for no reason at all.

And stuff like this is just... I wouldn't it justifty.
Grey the Stampede

Don't mess with powers you don't understand.

And yes. That means donuts.
Level: 82

Posts: 1624/3770
EXP: 5192909
For next: 16318

Since: 06-17-04
From: Kingston, RI, USA, Earth

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 01-26-05 11:24 PM Link | Quote
I'm ruthless enough to believe in Silvershield's idea, as many ends DO justify their means. However, I also agree with his logic that an end and a means are far too narrow-minded of a choice to be made. More often than not, there is a third, and indeed a fourth and fifth choice, which lead to means that really don't require justification.
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 2665/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 01-26-05 11:55 PM Link | Quote
Everything has a justification, as justification is completely subjective. Mind you, to me, I can find justification for attacks on US military interests. On the other hand some neocon (just stating random political viewpoint) may find it completely justified to kill the 4 year old son of a terrorist leader to get across a "point".
Dracoon

Zelda
The temp ban/forum ban bypasser!
Level: 84

Posts: 2368/3727
EXP: 5514391
For next: 147561

Since: 03-25-04
From: At home

Since last post: 5 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
Posted on 01-27-05 04:55 AM Link | Quote
No...

No end can justifie a mean. There is always another way, or better yet, the truth. Talking about drugs, you only tell the absolute truth, if you don't people will be less likely to trust you in the future.

Now as for putting a bomb in an airplane terminal, why did no one think of just having the pilots armed? They come breaking in with a knife and get shot. No real damage will be done to the plane, yes I know this for a fact, and everything would be a lot better. To hijack the plane you have to first take the pilots, so you have several means to stop it from happening. Just make it so the doors are locked from the inside, there is a camera that watches, and I'm sure if I was inventive enough I could just keep on going.

Really, there is always another way, and as another way exists the ends can never justifie the means. If there was only one way, and that one way only, then maybe... just maybe...
Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - World Affairs / Debate - Ethics: Does the End Justify the Means? | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.011 seconds.