Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
0 user currently in Suggestions/Bug Reports.
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Suggestions/Bug Reports - Blocking layouts. | |
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
HyperLamer
<||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people

Sesshomaru
Tamaranian

Level: 118

Posts: 3097/8210
EXP: 18171887
For next: 211027

Since: 03-15-04
From: Canada, w00t!
LOL FAD

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 02-02-05 02:55 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Zem
You mean, so they could be @included or linked to? It may seem counter-intuitive, but that would probably be easier if they kept the CSS in the database and had a php file that output the appropriate information when given an argument, such as userid. Like, userstyle.php?id=282 for example. This would avoid a lot of messy file-reading and -writing.

Hmm, hadn't thought of that.
Jesper
Busy, busy, busy.
Level: 69

Posts: 1857/2390
EXP: 2856000
For next: 13743

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden.

Since last post: 176 days
Last activity: 79 days
Posted on 02-07-05 06:03 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Elric
Yeah, the links need to be moved to the top of the page. There's a reason that Edit Profile, Post Radar, etc are at the top, and for that same reason, the important links, Send PM and Block Layout, need to be at the top too.

Of course, I think that Send PM needs to be added to thread.php right by the Quote link. Makes it even handier.
Wrongheaded thinking.

Menu's for board navigation or for tasks applying to your user account. Rest of page is for context-sensitive tasks. Profile links for doing things to the user, or viewing things about or by the user. Links around posts should be links about the post, not the user, the thread, the forum, or the user's dog Hank.

Yes, I know Mark as read is in the menu. It's the only thing that is in the menu on these policies and it's dumb. It should be elsewhere. In fact, I will personally move it elsewhere after I write this post.
Edit: Moved. Can you find it? I understand why Acmlm put it there in the first place - there's no solid spot on the index page for it, and it'd be stupid to have it in the menu on one page and not in the menu on the other page.


(edited by Jesper on 02-07-05 02:24 PM)
Vystrix Nexoth

Level: 30

Posts: 256/348
EXP: 158678
For next: 7191

Since: 03-15-04
From: somewhere between anima and animus

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 2 days
Posted on 02-07-05 09:01 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Neko-Arekusuchan
You forget though, IE will eventually give up and display the page anyway (I should know, it's happened to me many times) ... evidently for Firefox users, it won't even start
Assuming this is even the fault of Firefox, then that's one minor point, and furthermore is a problem with the page and not really of the browser itself (layouts in general can be disabled).

That still doesn't account for all the other shortcomings of MSIE, such as lack of tabbed browsing, longer load time (it takes less time to open a new tab in FX than a new window in MSIE), weaker security (let's make MSIE more than just a viewer, let's make it a remote program execution environment via ActiveX!) that's tied to the heart of the operating system, lack of proper CSS support, lack of proper PNG support, lack of configurability...

I'll take the occasional stalled layout over that any day of the week and twice on Sundays.

Originally posted by Neko-Arekusuchan
Anyway, Opera kicks all of your asses. Broken CSS? No problem, just display it as if it wasn't needed until it loads! (not to mention it's at version 7-something, and has been going on for a lot longer, so there's naturally going to be a lot less errors)
  • Broken CSS? try handling valid CSS. MSIE is the bane of web authors, the general sentiment of whom is to code to standards, then hack around MSIE's shortcomings.
  • Version numbers are not directly comparable. Opera is at version 7, therefore it is more advanced than MSIE version 6? After all, 7>6. By that logic, Firefox- which is at version 1.0- shouldn't even be a blip on the radar, yet it stands strong as one of the best browsers. So does Opera, and a few other browsers you've probably not even heard of... MSIE is more a relic of the past that survives only because of market inertia; it could scarcely compete on its own merits even at its best (back in the Browser Wars).


Those things said, is this a problem with how stylesheets are linked in, e.g. is it a problem with one of these two methods?
  • <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://www.example.com/boardstyle.css">
  • <style type="text/css">@import url(http://www.example.com/boardstyle.css);</style>


If so, I'll check that my layout at least uses the preferred method (if it's not already) and could make the same recommendation to others.

[Edit: 0x100th post! ]


(edited by Vystrix Nexoth on 02-07-05 05:04 PM)
HyperLamer
<||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people

Sesshomaru
Tamaranian

Level: 118

Posts: 3145/8210
EXP: 18171887
For next: 211027

Since: 03-15-04
From: Canada, w00t!
LOL FAD

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 02-09-05 06:46 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Vystrix Nexoth
Version numbers are not directly comparable. Opera is at version 7, therefore it is more advanced than MSIE version 6? After all, 7>6. By that logic, Firefox- which is at version 1.0- shouldn't even be a blip on the radar, yet it stands strong as one of the best browsers. So does Opera, and a few other browsers you've probably not even heard of...

Hell, by that logic, IE at V6.0 is more advanced than Windows itself at V5.1.
FreeDOS

Lava Lotus
Wannabe-Mod :<
Level: 59

Posts: 1078/1657
EXP: 1648646
For next: 24482

Since: 03-15-04
From: Seattle

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 02-09-05 07:16 AM Link | Quote
The problem lies with Firefox itself, not the board. It's because it wants to download the CSS file it was just requested to get. But the server on the other end is either slow or down... So Firefox takes up to 30 seconds to load it or it moves on. In my opinion, it should be move on then load it. If you have a problem, submit it to Mozilla's Bugzilla.

And Xkeeper, don't think that one problem with Firefox puts IE on top "again". It doesn't.
Hyperhacker, Windows Server 2003 is NT5.2. One point higher than your WinXP. Plus, that's just the NT line. The 16/32-bit line of Win 1.0 - Me were entirely different environments/OSes separate from NT, even though Microsoft tried to keep compatibility good between them.
Emptyeye
I am a real American!
Real American
Level: 67

Posts: 1436/2273
EXP: 2488421
For next: 104451

Since: 05-24-04
From: I DUNNOOOOOOOO!!

Since last post: 9 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 02-09-05 08:28 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by FreeDOS
The problem lies with Firefox itself, not the board. It's because it wants to download the CSS file it was just requested to get. But the server on the other end is either slow or down... So Firefox takes up to 30 seconds to load it or it moves on. In my opinion, it should be move on then load it. If you have a problem, submit it to Mozilla's Bugzilla.



Actually, as I understand it (And I may have read wrong), the problem lies with the XHTML standard that Firefox tries to follow, which says to STOP PARSING THE PAGE after it encounters an error of this type. This, to me, is a case where standards support isn't necessarily a good thing, because the standard itself is flawed.
Vystrix Nexoth

Level: 30

Posts: 262/348
EXP: 158678
For next: 7191

Since: 03-15-04
From: somewhere between anima and animus

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 2 days
Posted on 02-10-05 12:44 AM Link | Quote
Emptyeye: first of all, this board uses HTML (or a hacky facsimile thereof), not XHTML, so your point does not apply.

However, the reason it says to stop parsing XHTML the moment a syntax error is discovered is because that is a requirement of XHTML's host language, XML (and therefore applies to all XML applications, not just XHTML). And why do you consider it a bad thing to disallow syntax errors? As it is, HTML will look at a broken page and say "ohhhhh, okayyyy, fine, I'll allow it" (which implicitly tells the author that his/her code is correct when in fact it is not) whereas XML (hence XHTML) will duly inform the author if his/her error and afford him/her a chance to correct it.

That's not a bad thing: it makes it easier to parse XML and enforces cluefulness in those who write it. For the sake of example, suppose your average programming language (such as C++) were more lax about syntax errors. It's an arduous-enough journey compiling correct (syntax-wise) code, let alone all manner of vagaries that it would have to accomodate were it more permissive.

I for one see no problem in disallowing incorrect code (for a standard that enforced this from its very inception), because such code is, after all, incorrect. Naturally this is not a feasable course to follow for HTML (because of the sheer ubiquity of clueless code) but, as noted, XML (hence XHTML) has enforced syntactically-correct code from its very inception, and it is not a requirement I would like to see waived.
Zem
You can be civil without being flowery, dipshits.
Level: 49

Posts: 723/1107
EXP: 829398
For next: 54485

Since: 06-13-04

Since last post: 131 days
Last activity: 131 days
Posted on 02-12-05 05:51 AM Link | Quote
Also: a broken link is not a syntax error. The standard does NOT specify that XHTML should no longer be parsed after a broken link; after all, most of the use of an image's alt attribute is when the image fails to load.
HyperLamer
<||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people

Sesshomaru
Tamaranian

Level: 118

Posts: 3217/8210
EXP: 18171887
For next: 211027

Since: 03-15-04
From: Canada, w00t!
LOL FAD

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 02-12-05 06:10 AM Link | Quote
The real problem comes when a server responds but doesn't send any data. Mozilla seems to just wait forever when that happens.

Anyone else notice the new link?
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Suggestions/Bug Reports - Blocking layouts. | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.007 seconds.