Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
0 user currently in Basket Case.
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Basket Case - For Public Record... XKeeper's Ban... | | Thread closed
Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
ErkDog

Fuzz Ball
Level: 47

Posts: 901/982
EXP: 752190
For next: 14013

Since: 03-15-04
From: Richmond, VA

Since last post: 40 days
Last activity: 19 days
Posted on 11-10-04 08:28 AM Link
Why XKeeper is Banned, and Why it's MORE than justified.....

You can all see the comments XKeeper has made in

This thread

blatently accusing me of breaking rules by posting software news in General Discussion....

His posts were made soley to antagonize me.... this is Trolling... it is against the rules...

furthermore, they are offtopic... also against the rules....

The Offtopicness of the posts is undeniable..... but here is my unrefuteable fucking proof... that XK posting them in the first place was for NO other reason than to stir up shit with me... antagonize and provoke me.....

This Thread Started by Yarx.... is Software news..... XKeeper even REPLIED to this thread.... but was his reply of the nature... "This thread should not be here ErkDog, you are breaking the rules"

No it wasn't... because XK wasn't trying to start shit with Yarx.... also a staff member...

This thread Also could easily be in the H/S forum instead.... but it's not.... and does XKeeper care ? Nope, because I didn't post it....

This thread is borderline... it's news regarding Hotmail.... which isn't really hardware or software in the traditional sense.... but it could definitely be in the H/S forum...

This thread About Scratch proof CD's.. is OBVIOUSLY Hardware..... does XK publically protest this thread ?? I think not.. .why ?? because I didn't start it...

This Thread Started by yet another rebellious staffmember.... SomerZ... is about the iPod... correct me if I'm mistaken... but that is defininitely a computer hardware device.... but guess what... SomerZ isn't spelled ErkDog... so does XK protest this thread ?? no....

There are documented instances of XK Harassing me and antagonizing me sevearl times in the past on this forum.... any of you that deny this are just blind....



Now that I have made a steel reinforced concrete case for XK's ban.... I will now say that.... if you reply to this thread with bullshit about how unfair this is, or any number of other things..... I will just ban you too.... so you would be wise to think long and hard before replying to this thread..... with stupid bull shit like... OMG ERKDOG you NAZIII or I love XKEEPER HE MAKES ME LAUGH.... or whatever....

about the only reason you SHOULD reply to this thread... is if you think you can proove to me that it is not painfully obvious that XK was just trying to stir up shit with me.....

That being said... see you in a week XKeeper....
windwaker

Ball and Chain Trooper
WHY ALL THE MAYONNAISE HATE
Level: 61

Posts: 309/1797
EXP: 1860597
For next: 15999

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 6 days
Posted on 11-10-04 08:38 AM Link
Wow. I like how you actually gave proof for it .

I have to disagree with the offtopic stuff. At least he was trolling Firefox in the firefox thread, hehe. But everything else you said is of course backed up.
ErkDog

Fuzz Ball
Level: 47

Posts: 903/982
EXP: 752190
For next: 14013

Since: 03-15-04
From: Richmond, VA

Since last post: 40 days
Last activity: 19 days
Posted on 11-10-04 08:41 AM Link
just for the sake of completeness....

This Thread however not directly PC Software Hardware, could easily be located in the Hardware / Software forum as it is an electronic and in the same realm....

This Thread Another about iPods... and other MP3 players... you can't have MP3's unless you download them on a PC first.. automatically making anything MP3 related PC / Hardware / Software related....

This Thread is about SOFTWARE Piracy... don't tell me THAT shouldn't go in Software forum...

two of those 3 threads I just listed were started by HyperHacker... again which is not spelled ErkDog, which explains why XK didn't throw a tizzy in them....
Colleen
Administrator
Level: 136

Posts: 5036/11302
EXP: 29369328
For next: 727587

Since: 03-15-04
From: LaSalle, Quebec, Canada

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 11-10-04 09:03 AM Link
OK, for the sake of clarification here... Xk asked me to post this, and he was fairly adamant about this being posted. So don't shoot the messenger. That being said:



I'm having another person post this because I'm too busy laughing to make a new account, and besides, it won't be as fun.

Anyway.

------------------

Blantantly accusing you of breaking rules? Woah, hang on there! If you forgot, you should ALWAYS MAKE SURE THAT THERE ARE NO THREADS DEALING WITH THE SAME TOPIC THAT ARE WITHIN POST RANGE.

THe other Firefox 1.0 thread was perfectly acceptible, was dealing with the exact same topic, and was well within post range (less than a day old, even)

-----------------------

"Soley to antagonize you"... oh, I'm sorry. Evidently the thousands of insults directed at other members by other members are perfectly fine because they're other users and not Super Admin Erkdog! Oh, wait!

You said they were "...soley to antagonize me...", yet you must've ignored the fact that about 90% of my posts were actually dealing with Firefox in itself and how it's being forced down people's throats. Better get that reading comprehension up, it'll be on the final.

-----------------------

Continuing, no, I did not get after Yarx because it was merely one thing that was wrong (wrong forum, yet still an interesting article). Your post, however, had several things wrong (wrong forum, duplicate thread, etc) yet it's perfectly fine to completely ignore the board rules (stated above in capitals) ... irony.

-----------------------

On the subject of the Cracks/Keygens thread, I was under the impression it was already in that forum.

The Hotmail thread? Yes, it could've gone in there, and I was considering posting in that thread, but not for the same reason (again, one thing wrong)

Scratchproof CD's? Note the rest: "And other scratch-resistant things" -- it deals with many things. CDs are not Hardware/Software, but are more of a general topic (ie: music, video, gaming, software, frisbees, shingles), and therefore fits nicely in General.

The iPOD thread --- or the iPOD itself is a media player, which could again likely go into either Entertainment (after all, a DVD player wouldn't go into H/S, so the logic applies to this) and could also go into H/S (computer connectivity, deals with alike things), and once again is a general topic.

-----------------------

For the "harassing me and antagonizing me...", you almost deserve it due to your lack of spelling and grammatical skills ("i... talk liek... This") and you obviously ignore any other instance of said antagonizing ala certain other members. Go figure.

-----------------------

"if you reply to this thread with bullshit about how unfair this is, or any number of other things..... I will just ban you too...."

Scare tactics don't work, obviously. So evidently if someone decides to disagree with you (hi!) you instantly ban them? Woah, problem. Evidently someone doesn't know how to handle opinions; you would never had made Admin status if you weren't hosting the board.

-----------------------

Ending Notes: It's "Xkeeper" or "Xk". Note the lowercase letters.

-----------------------

[08:42.04p] [&ErkDog> the fact that he broke them against me, is immaterial
[08:42.08p] [&ErkDog> whatev I don't care
[08:42.17p] [&ErkDog> if someone disagrees with me
[08:42.19p] [&ErkDog> they will undo it
[08:42.29p] [&ErkDog> but I doubt they will

I would like to point out that the way I interpreted this is that "if someone disagrees with me, they will take back (undo) their statement". This is just further proof that ErkDog cannot (and likely will never be able to) accept opinions other than his own.

Then again, I'm banned anyway so what the fuck do I care if I get further banned? Whoopdiedo, just further proof that a certain admin isn't able to handle opinions very well...
ErkDog

Fuzz Ball
Level: 47

Posts: 904/982
EXP: 752190
For next: 14013

Since: 03-15-04
From: Richmond, VA

Since last post: 40 days
Last activity: 19 days
Posted on 11-10-04 09:09 AM Link
Okay Xkeeper... way to shoot yourself in the foot with this...

"On the subject of the Cracks/Keygens thread, I was under the impression it was already in that forum. "

So it's okay for a Cracks and Keygens thread to be posted in General Discussion, since there is already one in Hardware Software....

but not Firefox ??

right.....

as far as the duplicate thread..... I don't read hardware / software like EVER... so how could I possibly know there was a firefox thread there already ??

ohh wait, I couldn't....

and XK.... I have bitched about the fact that the administration of this forum, CONSTANTLY allows the members to flame and troll eachother on SEVERAL occasions in the staff forum.... if I had my druthers... several people would likely stay banned on this board..... but I gave up trying to fight that fight long, long ago..... since none of the administration does care that half the active posters troll and flame eachother constantly....

if you don't believe me... just ask a few of them... I complain people making bullshit offtopic trollish posts all the time....
Zem
You can be civil without being flowery, dipshits.
Level: 49

Posts: 342/1107
EXP: 829398
For next: 54485

Since: 06-13-04

Since last post: 131 days
Last activity: 131 days
Posted on 11-10-04 09:11 AM Link
I understand that some people might be interested in watching ErkDog and Xkeeper talk shit interminably (almost as fun as ErkDog vs. Jesper!!!!), but it would seem to me that a public thread is not the ideal medium.

What do I know?


(edited by Zem on 11-10-04 12:12 AM)
Mel
(USER WAS TOTALLY AWESOME FOR THIS POST)
Level: 47

Posts: 574/991
EXP: 762490
For next: 3713

Since: 03-15-04
From: secure tripcodes are for jerks

Since last post: 17 min.
Last activity: 16 min.
Posted on 11-10-04 09:13 AM Link
ZEM <333

Oh, and I was given some more to add to this.

"By 'under the impression ... already in that forum', I meant that I thought that thread was in H/S, not Gen Chat. And given the fact that the thread deals with H/S, you should've checked that forum. Common sense sucks, doesn't it?"
Valcion
YOU WA SHOCK
Level: 50

Posts: 634/1139
EXP: 939607
For next: 7710

Since: 03-15-04
From: internets.

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 11-10-04 09:15 AM Link
HEAVEN OR HELL

DUEL ONE

LETS ROCK
ErkDog

Fuzz Ball
Level: 47

Posts: 905/982
EXP: 752190
For next: 14013

Since: 03-15-04
From: Richmond, VA

Since last post: 40 days
Last activity: 19 days
Posted on 11-10-04 09:24 AM Link
Well zem.. the only reason I posted this thread... is because I would have posted it in staff forum anyway.... and it just saved the staff about 5,000 IM's and PM's of people going

OMG WHY IS ZKXKEJRTAPPER THA BANZED......

and since I tend to agree with you, there is no real reason to discuss it... this thread will be closed....

if any staff member feels the need to publically add to this thread, feel free to open and post/close.... I don't care....
Yarx

Keese
That Zelda Fanatic
i am a wootest!
Danicess Snuggle Slave!
Fragapalooza!
RTFM!

Level: 20

Posts: 126/133
EXP: 37485
For next: 4954

Since: 03-15-04
From: Edmonton

Since last post: 132 days
Last activity: 18 days
Posted on 11-10-04 09:27 AM Link
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aside from the very first thread linked in your post Erk, the rest were just things that XKeeper didn't complain about? How can you use something that a member didn't do as grounds for a ban?? Based on the first thread alone, I don't think the emotions expressed in the messages warrants a 10 day ban.
ErkDog

Fuzz Ball
Level: 47

Posts: 907/982
EXP: 752190
For next: 14013

Since: 03-15-04
From: Richmond, VA

Since last post: 40 days
Last activity: 19 days
Posted on 11-10-04 09:29 AM Link
it's just 1 week....

and the point is that he obviously targetted me.... he posted in YOUR thread... which is OBVIOUSLY computer related.... but didn't make any claims to it being posted in the wrong place.....

you can't logically deny that Xk obviously looks for opportunities to start thigns with me....

there are at least 3 documented incidents on the old board...

and 2 on the new board


edit: 4 days .....


(edited by ErkDog on 11-10-04 12:35 AM)
Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Basket Case - For Public Record... XKeeper's Ban... | | Thread closed


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.005 seconds.