Register | Login | |||||
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| ACS
| Commons
| Calendar
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat |
| |
0 user currently in Hardware/Software. |
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Hardware/Software - new hardware needed | | | |
Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
User | Post | ||
judgement Newcomer Level: 4 Posts: 2/5 EXP: 272 For next: 7 Since: 03-16-04 From: Michigan Since last post: 522 days Last activity: 339 days |
| ||
I have a dell dimension 4300S its not a very good comp. it only has 128 mb of ram and a 16 mb ati rage pro graphics card..... (ok now thats done and over with) with much negotiation my mother (bless her heart) has decided to pitch in for a new graphics card and more memory. i have decided on a 512 mb memory upgrade which she has agreed with 100%, the only problem i have is selecting a graphics card i really have no clue what cards could be compatible with this system, could anyone give me any suggestions to what i should get? i was think something along the line of maybe 64 mb card to a 128 mb card my price range isnt very high ($50-$120) so anyone have any suggestions or help? i would really appreciate it | |||
neotransotaku Baby Mario 戻れたら、 誰も気が付く Level: 87 Posts: 626/4016 EXP: 6220548 For next: 172226 Since: 03-15-04 From: Outside of Time/Space Since last post: 11 hours Last activity: 1 hour |
| ||
You want the latest ATi card...not sure what that is...but I know it has more than enough video RAM (i believe it was 128MB of DDR RAM) and it outperforms nVidia... | |||
kitty Come on babe, pet the pussy ;) Level: 70 Posts: 1145/2449 EXP: 2962406 For next: 53405 Since: 03-15-04 From: Scranton, PA, USA Since last post: 3 hours Last activity: 3 hours |
| ||
I don't know shit about this model and I'm not going to Dell's site to look it up... Tell me what kind of CPU, and its speed, what kind of system RAM, etc. If it's like 800MHz or less which is likely by the sounds of your card, you're wasting money on it upgading it, because no amount of RAM or no better video card will help you play new games with any decency... your CPU would be too slow. |
|||
judgement Newcomer Level: 4 Posts: 3/5 EXP: 272 For next: 7 Since: 03-16-04 From: Michigan Since last post: 522 days Last activity: 339 days |
| ||
its got a 1.5 ghz (Pentium 4) processor and 128 mb of ram | |||
NightHawk Bob-Omb Level: 39 Posts: 101/621 EXP: 374743 For next: 30028 Since: 03-26-04 From: Switzerland Since last post: 432 days Last activity: 339 days |
| ||
Originally posted by judgementIs it SD-RAM or RD-RAM? If it's SD-RAM, your chances of playing recent games with good quality settings are... slim. The Pentium4 is a bandwidth hog, and SD-RAM has about |
|||
kitty Come on babe, pet the pussy ;) Level: 70 Posts: 1151/2449 EXP: 2962406 For next: 53405 Since: 03-15-04 From: Scranton, PA, USA Since last post: 3 hours Last activity: 3 hours |
| ||
Well, with a P4 1.5, even RDRAM isn't that much better than SDRAM, you're talking about the Willamete core, the worst fucking processor ever - the 1.2GHz P3 is faster than a 1.5GHz P4, and a 1.2GHz Athlon (not even AthlonXP) kicks its ass too. With that PC, I'd limit to a 9600 Pro, as far as video cards go - any higher is WAY too much (overkill). Your CPU doesn't have the power to take advantage of a faster card - it becomes the bottleneck. But you SHOULD have at least 256MB of RAM. |
|||
NightHawk Bob-Omb Level: 39 Posts: 104/621 EXP: 374743 For next: 30028 Since: 03-26-04 From: Switzerland Since last post: 432 days Last activity: 339 days |
| ||
A 9500 (non-Pro) would probably have more than enough performance, if he can find one on sale. If not, then I agree... the 9600 Pro won't bottleneck his system, and he could probably even turn on some of the higher quality options. |
|||
ErkDog Fuzz Ball Level: 47 Posts: 567/982 EXP: 752190 For next: 14013 Since: 03-15-04 From: Richmond, VA Since last post: 40 days Last activity: 19 days |
| ||
RDRam isn't better than DDR ever... cause RDRam is shit... that's why.... nobody hardly sells it any more | |||
kitty Come on babe, pet the pussy ;) Level: 70 Posts: 11157/2449 EXP: 2962406 For next: 53405 Since: 03-15-04 From: Scranton, PA, USA Since last post: 3 hours Last activity: 3 hours |
| ||
Originally posted by ErkDogUm, SDRAM != DDRAM. And BTW, original P4 DDRs were SC, not DC, and DC RDRAM was the best until DC DDR came out. DC RDRAM only sucked because it was 1) Expensive 2) You needed continuity RIMMs (WTF?) |
|||
judgement Newcomer Level: 4 Posts: 4/5 EXP: 272 For next: 7 Since: 03-16-04 From: Michigan Since last post: 522 days Last activity: 339 days |
| ||
ok i guess i should start searching for a 9600 card or a 9500 pro card | |||
Demonspitfir Permaban - Broke WAY too many rules to count in one thread. Level: 13 Posts: 44/52 EXP: 8734 For next: 1533 Since: 05-08-04 From: The Deepest Pits Of Hell Since last post: 525 days Last activity: 339 days |
| ||
I Suggest That Instead Of Upgrading You Just Sell Your P.C. After Formating It And Buy A Whole New One Because All This Stuff Could Slow Your P.C. Down With 1 Accidental Download! Only 2 Things I Ever Recommend Updating Are Ram And Memory Also I Suggest If You Wish To Add A New Graphics Card You Contact The Company ! ATI Has A New Graphics Download Out BTW Free Of Charge All You Have To Do Is Have A Previously Installed ATI Card... And Then You Get The Next Best Graphics Download.! | |||
kitty Come on babe, pet the pussy ;) Level: 70 Posts: 1165/2449 EXP: 2962406 For next: 53405 Since: 03-15-04 From: Scranton, PA, USA Since last post: 3 hours Last activity: 3 hours |
| ||
Originally posted by judgement9600 PRO. 9600 non-pro SUCKS. A 9500 non-pro is like a 9600 Pro just a teeny bit slower. A 9500 Pro is faster than a 9600 Pro but more expensive and has been discontinued for a few months now. 9600 Pros are easier to find. 9600 Pro or 9600 XT is a good card. ASK before you buy something if it isn't a 9500 Pro, 9600 Pro, or 9600 XT. ATi's naming scheme SUCKS MONKEY BALLS. For example, a 9800 SE or 9800 (non-pro) is SLOWER than a 9600 Pro. A 9500 Pro is faster than a 9600 Pro. A 9800 Pro is faster than all, and 9800 XT even faster but really expensive. Confused yet? Well, an 8500 LE is faster than a 9200 SE. An 8500 is faster than a 9200 or 9000. A 9100 is ABOUT the same as an 8500LE. STILL not confused? |
|||
NightHawk Bob-Omb Level: 39 Posts: 116/621 EXP: 374743 For next: 30028 Since: 03-26-04 From: Switzerland Since last post: 432 days Last activity: 339 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Yiffy KittenHey, you forgot the 9700!Originally posted by judgement9600 PRO. 9600 non-pro SUCKS. A 9500 non-pro is like a 9600 Pro just a teeny bit slower. A 9500 Pro is faster than a 9600 Pro but more expensive and has been discontinued for a few months now. 9600 Pros are easier to find. 9600 Pro or 9600 XT is a good card. You know, the one that the 9600XT should've been faster than, but it in most benchmarks, wasn't? |
|||
judgement Newcomer Level: 4 Posts: 5/5 EXP: 272 For next: 7 Since: 03-16-04 From: Michigan Since last post: 522 days Last activity: 339 days |
| ||
ok first of all my computer isnt going to be able to work with a 9800 iv have tried with my friends card so its not like a have alot of options here, like i said im searching for a 9600 or a 9500 is anyone is selling one or knows someone who is contact me in this thread. | |||
kitty Come on babe, pet the pussy ;) Level: 70 Posts: 1175/2449 EXP: 2962406 For next: 53405 Since: 03-15-04 From: Scranton, PA, USA Since last post: 3 hours Last activity: 3 hours |
| ||
Won't work with a 9800? You must have no AGP slot? If that's the case, forget video upgrades. A GF4 MX is the fastest you can get for it. It MIGHT be able to play SOME stuff, but games liek Far Cry... forget it! |
Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Hardware/Software - new hardware needed | | | |