 |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| ACS
| Commons
| Calendar
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat |
|
| | ||
|
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| ACS
| Commons
| Calendar
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat |
|
| | ||
| 0 user currently in Suggestions/Bug Reports. |
| Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Suggestions/Bug Reports - To add, or not to add... |
 |  |  |
| Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| User | Post | ||
Lenophis Super Koopa Level: 44  Posts: 528/830 EXP: 584360 For next: 26925 Since: 03-15-04 From: Duluth, MN Since last post: 4 hours Last activity: 3 hours |
| ||
that is the question. And yes, for every thread I ever make in this forum, I am always intentionally vague.  How about if PM inboxes have the option to never accept PM's from any given user, kind of like how the block layout goes. You can block a layout from every displaying, you should be able to not accept any PM's from a given user. I know of at least two people who wouldn't hesitate to use this function, but I do want to hear some input on the matter. |
|||
Prier Archangel Administrative Priestess. NUCLEAR SUB WEEEOOOO Level: 119  Posts: 6523/8392 EXP: 18790939 For next: 138352 Since: 03-15-04 From: Nerima Dist. - Tokyo, Japan Since last post: 1 day Last activity: 1 day |
| ||
| Was suggested a while back. Don't really see why not. System messages won't be able to be blocked. |
|||
|
Kefka Indefinitely Unbanned Level: 81 Posts: 3253/3392 EXP: 4826208 For next: 166641 Since: 03-15-04 From: Pomona, CALIFORNIA BABY! Since last post: 4 hours Last activity: 4 hours |
| ||
| DO IT! FUCKING DO IT! I DON'T CARE IF NO ONE KNOWS HOW! HOLY SHIT! I NEED THIS! I know that Colleen would make sure to block me, too. But first thing I would do is block YOU, Leno! | |||
|
BMF98567 BLACK HAS BUILT A SILLY DICE-MAZE! GO! Current list of BURNING FURY >8( recipients: - Yiffy Kitten (x2) - Xkeeper Level: 53  Posts: 967/1261 EXP: 1094149 For next: 62970 Since: 03-15-04 From: Blobaria Special Move: Rising Meatloaf Backhand Combo Since last post: 21 hours Last activity: 1 hour |
| ||
| STRONGLY AGREE. I know I could've used this feature several times.  (edited by BMF54123 on 07-11-05 03:19 AM) |
|||
|
NSNick Laidback Admin Level: 85  Posts: 2907/3875 EXP: 5895841 For next: 2699 Since: 03-15-04 From: North Side School: OSU Since last post: 9 hours Last activity: 1 hour |
| ||
| Just make it so you can't ignore PMs from anyone with a powerlevel higher than yours. | |||
|
Surlent サーレント Level: 49  Posts: 915/1077 EXP: 863920 For next: 19963 Since: 03-15-04 From: Tower of Lezard Valeth Since last post: 16 hours Last activity: 1 hour |
| ||
| How about deleting them unread ? |
|||
|
Prier Archangel Administrative Priestess. NUCLEAR SUB WEEEOOOO Level: 119 Posts: 6546/8392 EXP: 18790939 For next: 138352 Since: 03-15-04 From: Nerima Dist. - Tokyo, Japan Since last post: 1 day Last activity: 1 day |
| ||
Originally posted by Surlent That would be too easy. >( Plus, if someone went nuts on the PMing binge, this is a way to shut them up before they get banned. (edited by Priere on 07-11-05 10:28 AM) |
|||
|
Yoshi Dude XKEEPER STOLE MY CAR KEYS Level: 79  Posts: 2466/3271 EXP: 4572680 For next: 6787 Since: 03-15-04 From: give me a number folks. Since last post: 3 hours Last activity: 2 hours |
| ||
| Sounds like a great idea. I can't think of anyone that I would block personally, but I can see how it'd be helpful to others. Would the person sending the PM's be aware that they're blocked, or would it all be private? |
|||
|
Surlent サーレント Level: 49 Posts: 916/1077 EXP: 863920 For next: 19963 Since: 03-15-04 From: Tower of Lezard Valeth Since last post: 16 hours Last activity: 1 hour |
| ||
| Since an AcmlmBoard's PM system doesn't act like that in a phpBB-one, I doubt the sender will notice any difference. In phpBBs PMs are stored in your outgoing messages folder until the recipient comes online to "receive" it, so there can be tracked if a message was deliviered or not. So, send a message to someone who comes not online for a long time - it will be still in your phpBB outgoing messages folder. I think what might be good in this case: A "blocked users" sub-folder. This folder must not be deletable and the board checks then, when a message is sent, if the user is on the blacklist of the recipient. If it matches, the message is directly sent into that folder - also the flag "You have x new messages" should be set to off. Unless there arrive multiple messages at the same time from friends AND an ignored user, then this might cause problems, if the flag is removed but along with the normal PMs you won't notice you got any PMs. |
|||
Xeolord - B l u e s - Power Metal > All Level: 81  Posts: 2632/3418 EXP: 4884196 For next: 108653 Since: 03-15-04 From: Yeah Since last post: 15 hours Last activity: 15 hours |
| ||
| Yeah, again (like I say every time this idea comes up) I think this is a great idea. Hell, even recently there were a few issues with some users that were sending out female members multiple [retarded] PM's. So, wouldn't it have been nice if they could have simply blocked that user from being able to send them PM's? I say, if we can block layouts, why not PM's from users we don't want to recieve PM's from? Good idea, just hopefully it'll actually be considered by the higher-ups. |
|||
|
||bass Programmer Admin Level: 44  Posts: 625/817 EXP: 570813 For next: 40472 Since: 03-15-04 From: Salem, Connecticut Since last post: 26 days Last activity: 11 days |
| ||
| Oh it will be considered. I'm trying to get as much member input into the 1.a4 revision as possible. | |||
|
HyperLamer <||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people Sesshomaru Tamaranian Level: 118 Posts: 5721/8210 EXP: 18171887 For next: 211027 Since: 03-15-04 From: Canada, w00t! LOL FAD Since last post: 2 hours Last activity: 2 hours |
| ||
As long as we're on the subject, maybe certain users could be not allowed to PM anyone below a certain powerlevel? Like a temp ban for PMs. (And automatically applied to banned users.  ) If someone PM spams, the recipients can block them, but that won't stop them from doing it to other people. |
|||
neotransotaku Baby Mario 戻れたら、 誰も気が付く Level: 87 Posts: 3541/4016 EXP: 6220548 For next: 172226 Since: 03-15-04 From: Outside of Time/Space Since last post: 11 hours Last activity: 1 hour |
| ||
| wouldn't that require shifting the powerlevels by one to allow people to still come to the board? power level of -1 is already a ban... | |||
|
HyperLamer <||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people Sesshomaru Tamaranian Level: 118 Posts: 5756/8210 EXP: 18171887 For next: 211027 Since: 03-15-04 From: Canada, w00t! LOL FAD Since last post: 2 hours Last activity: 2 hours |
| ||
| Last I checked, banned people can still PM. | |||
Sukasa Boomboom Error 349857348734534: The system experienced an error. Level: 57  Posts: 1235/1981 EXP: 1446921 For next: 39007 Since: 02-06-05 From: *Shrug* Since last post: 6 days Last activity: 1 day |
| ||
| well, it would be a great Idea, but in the way of PM'ing, my only suggestion would be to add another variable along the line of a PMpowerlevel, that determined if you could PM, could not PM, or could not be blocked. | |||
Possessed Metal axe Level: 17  Posts: 73/161 EXP: 22987 For next: 1756 Since: 06-28-05 Since last post: 100 days Last activity: 94 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Darkflight Yeah, that would be a nice little addition too. Just as long as you make sure that every one can PM every one else no matter what PM lv they are. |
|||
|
Sukasa Boomboom Error 349857348734534: The system experienced an error. Level: 57 Posts: 1239/1981 EXP: 1446921 For next: 39007 Since: 02-06-05 From: *Shrug* Since last post: 6 days Last activity: 1 day |
| ||
| yea, just not have th ePM go through if the person has blocked them, but instead go to a blocked PM's folder. | |||
|
Possessed Metal axe Level: 17 Posts: 74/161 EXP: 22987 For next: 1756 Since: 06-28-05 Since last post: 100 days Last activity: 94 days |
| ||
| Oh, there's going to be a Block Folder? I thought that all blocked PM's would be deleted. I guess they could be deleted after a certain length of time spent in the blocked box, and of course there would be a delete option. | |||
|
Xkeeper The required libraries have not been defined. Level: NAN  Posts: 3281/-863 EXP: NAN For next: 0 Since: 03-15-04 Since last post: 2 hours Last activity: -753366 sec. |
| ||
| 1. blocked PMs get sent to a special box for them 2. blocked PMs are marked as new, but don't trigger the new PM notification 3. blocked PMs can still be moved / deleted, but aren't auto-deleted or any other bullshit people who PM spam will be banned people who PM spam when banned will be IP-banned there. |
| Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Suggestions/Bug Reports - To add, or not to add... |
| | |
