Register | Login | |||||
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| ACS
| Commons
| Calendar
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat |
| |
0 user currently in Craziness Domain. | 2 guests |
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Craziness Domain - Mathmatical proof of "1+1=2"! | | | |
Pages: 1 2 3 | Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
User | Post | ||
Ikuzou Cheep-cheep Level: 19 Posts: 9/181 EXP: 30977 For next: 4800 Since: 05-24-05 From: Japan Since last post: 64 days Last activity: 3 days |
| ||
There was mathmatical proof for 1+1=2! http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/51551.html Well, it's not crazy, but it is crazy |
|||
Legion banning people for no reason sure is fun Level: 101 Posts: 3980/5657 EXP: 10399737 For next: 317938 Since: 03-15-04 From: The Crossroads is under attack! Since last post: 5 days Last activity: 5 days |
| ||
Why would you need proof of this? And I think this is the same guy who debunked the .999~ = 1 theory. Of course anyone who believed that in the first place should go back to pre-school mathematics. |
|||
Dracoon Zelda The temp ban/forum ban bypasser! Level: 84 Posts: 3036/3727 EXP: 5514391 For next: 147561 Since: 03-25-04 From: At home Since last post: 5 hours Last activity: 5 hours |
| ||
You can't do a ~ = in the first place... I think the only time you're even allowed to do a ~ is when it involves PI. And you want to know my proof for it. You take one apple, then decide to take another apple. Having taken no apple's previously, how many apples do you have? Or, what is the word we use for the whole number above one, but a whole number below three? |
|||
Graviteh Level: 31 Posts: 288/500 EXP: 165989 For next: 19374 Since: 03-27-05 From: The Internet Since last post: 42 days Last activity: 1 day |
| ||
.999... = 1 x = .999... 1000x = 999.999... (999.999...) - (.999) = 999x = 999 .999... = x = 1 |
|||
Dracoon Zelda The temp ban/forum ban bypasser! Level: 84 Posts: 3038/3727 EXP: 5514391 For next: 147561 Since: 03-25-04 From: At home Since last post: 5 hours Last activity: 5 hours |
| ||
Thats not a proof Graviteh... that's... stupid really... | |||
Kitten Yiffer Purple wand Furry moderator Vivent l'exp����¯�¿�½������©rience de signalisation d'amusement, ou bien ! Level: 135 Posts: 9722/11162 EXP: 28824106 For next: 510899 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden Since last post: 3 hours Last activity: 4 min. |
| ||
Besides, the line ".999... = x = 1" really breaks the rules of Algebra. That formula don't prove anything. Talk about taking a mathemtical detour there. xD |
|||
Dracoon Zelda The temp ban/forum ban bypasser! Level: 84 Posts: 3039/3727 EXP: 5514391 For next: 147561 Since: 03-25-04 From: At home Since last post: 5 hours Last activity: 5 hours |
| ||
As I said ~ should only be used when dealing with PI because of the infinite decimimal places. | |||
Ran-chan Moldorm eek, when are they going to stop growing... Level: 143 Posts: 9665/12781 EXP: 35293588 For next: 538220 Since: 03-15-04 From: Nerima District, Tokyo - Japan Since last post: 12 hours Last activity: 12 hours |
| ||
Why make a thread about something that we already know? 1+1 is 11. |
|||
FreeDOS Lava Lotus Wannabe-Mod :< Level: 59 Posts: 1448/1657 EXP: 1648646 For next: 24482 Since: 03-15-04 From: Seattle Since last post: 6 hours Last activity: 4 hours |
| ||
Actually, 1 + 1 = 10, isn't it? Also: take 1/3 1/3 = .333~ 1/3 * 2 = 2/3 = .666~ 1/3 * 3 = 3/3 = .999~ = 1 Not exactly proof either, but it's good enough for me. |
|||
Graviteh Level: 31 Posts: 295/500 EXP: 165989 For next: 19374 Since: 03-27-05 From: The Internet Since last post: 42 days Last activity: 1 day |
| ||
Originally posted by Dracoon I bet you didn't even try to look at it and examine it. You see, if x = .999... then 1000x = 999.999... You subtract x from 1000x that is 999.999 - .999 and you end up with 999x = 999 |
|||
MathOnNapkins Math n' Hacks Level: 67 Posts: 1882/2189 EXP: 2495887 For next: 96985 Since: 03-18-04 From: Base Tourian Since last post: 1 hour Last activity: 32 min. |
| ||
Originally posted by Kitty Jedi This does not "break the rules of Algebra". You see stuff like this all the time. However, Graviteh's first line ".999... =1" is not necessary in the proof, since that would be assuming what you wish to prove. And the stuff about proving 1 + 1 is actually necessary b/c you need a formal system to describe something. Mathematicians don't deal in "Well it seems this way so we'll just say it's true." Rather than putting it in terms of addition, it characterizes the integers in terms of a "successor function", a very important concept in advanced math. Specifically it employs the Peano axioms (when you use them it's called playing the Peano.) Also, .99999... = 1 b/c if you had a sequence .9, .99, .999, .9999, ... this is a monotone increasing sequence with supremum = 1, hence it converges to 1. (edited by MathOnNapkins on 05-26-05 07:38 AM) |
|||
Kles Red Paratroopa Level: 21 Posts: 151/171 EXP: 44517 For next: 5426 Since: 10-02-04 Since last post: 62 days Last activity: 45 days |
| ||
I hate math. It's supposed to be all super and accurate but it's one of the most inaccurate "sciences." I mean, sheesh, we can't even cut ten in to three even parts. | |||
MathOnNapkins Math n' Hacks Level: 67 Posts: 1884/2189 EXP: 2495887 For next: 96985 Since: 03-18-04 From: Base Tourian Since last post: 1 hour Last activity: 32 min. |
| ||
Yes we can. Just pick a different base. The problem of 1/3 being repeating is relative to the fact that 3 is coprime with 10. We use base 10, that is the problem. But in any base system you fill find numbers that share no factors with the base. e.g. in base 3, the representation for 10 is 101. ( 9 + 0*3 + 1). And the representation for 3 is 10. so 10/3 would be represented as 10.1. Notice, no repeating representation. And never call math an inexact science. It is the most exact science you will ever find. You cannot disprove known results in math, but you can disprove theories in physics, chemistry, biology, etc, if you find the proper evidence. |
|||
Legion banning people for no reason sure is fun Level: 101 Posts: 3993/5657 EXP: 10399737 For next: 317938 Since: 03-15-04 From: The Crossroads is under attack! Since last post: 5 days Last activity: 5 days |
| ||
Originally posted by FreeDOS The thing about that is that 1/3 does NOT equal .333~ |
|||
Colleen Administrator Level: 136 Posts: 8366/11302 EXP: 29369328 For next: 727587 Since: 03-15-04 From: LaSalle, Quebec, Canada Since last post: 3 hours Last activity: 1 hour |
| ||
*pauses* *takes a CD case* *takes out another CD case* *puts the cases side by side* One CD case... two CD cases. Proof enough, no? (Mathematicians... always trying to prove the most simple concepts that we take for granted.) |
|||
FreeDOS Lava Lotus Wannabe-Mod :< Level: 59 Posts: 1451/1657 EXP: 1648646 For next: 24482 Since: 03-15-04 From: Seattle Since last post: 6 hours Last activity: 4 hours |
| ||
Originally posted by Darth Legious How does it not? What I said the value of 1/3 is is exactly what I've been taught... and everybody else I know holds true also. |
|||
Legion banning people for no reason sure is fun Level: 101 Posts: 4007/5657 EXP: 10399737 For next: 317938 Since: 03-15-04 From: The Crossroads is under attack! Since last post: 5 days Last activity: 5 days |
| ||
Originally posted by FreeDOSOriginally posted by Darth Legious To say that 1/3 is equal to .333~, it would have to hold true in reverse. .333~ is not equal to 1/3 obviously. It's the same arguement as .999~ = 1. It's gets close, but never actually gets there. The reason you say everyone holds that to be true is just that it's commonly accepted. It's so insanely close that it really doesn't make a difference if you use it that way. But in a technical sense, 1/3 does not equal .333~ |
|||
The SomerZ Summer, yay! Level: 45 Posts: 770/862 EXP: 618182 For next: 41982 Since: 03-15-04 From: Norway Since last post: 2 days Last activity: 3 hours |
| ||
.999~ = 1 is comparing .999~, which is an infinte number, to 1, which is a finite number. An infinite number can't be the same as a finite number, it's that simple. | |||
kitty Come on babe, pet the pussy ;) Level: 70 Posts: 1369/2449 EXP: 2962406 For next: 53405 Since: 03-15-04 From: Scranton, PA, USA Since last post: 3 hours Last activity: 3 hours |
| ||
Asking some people to understand something that simple is like asking some people why they voted for Bush. You never get an intelligent answer. It's like how some people say, 1/3 = 0.333, 2/3 = 0.666, 1/3 + 2/3 = 0.999 = 1. But 1/3 + 2/3 = 3/3, and 1/3 != 0.333, nor does 2/3 = 0.666. 2/3 is closer to 0.667 than 0.666, and in which case, that whole argument is moot, anyway. |
|||
FreeDOS Lava Lotus Wannabe-Mod :< Level: 59 Posts: 1452/1657 EXP: 1648646 For next: 24482 Since: 03-15-04 From: Seattle Since last post: 6 hours Last activity: 4 hours |
| ||
Originally posted by Darth Legious Then you're not seeing the number as it is... the little tilde (~) indicates that the pattern repeats. In mathematics, it would be a bar over the digits. However, that can't be done in HTML (I could make an image, but that'd be pointless). .333~ will be the same as .3~ or .33333~. It does not mean 333/1000. Originally posted by The Gamorr Z You're confusing infinity (which is not writtable except for a sideways 8) with an infinite number of digits. |
Pages: 1 2 3 | Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Craziness Domain - Mathmatical proof of "1+1=2"! | | | |