Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
0 user currently in Hardware/Software.
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Hardware/Software - IE7 Details. | |
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
FreeDOS

Lava Lotus
Wannabe-Mod :<
Level: 59

Posts: 1344/1657
EXP: 1648646
For next: 24482

Since: 03-15-04
From: Seattle

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 04-09-05 10:13 PM Link | Quote
Why was this quite old topic bumped?
anyway . . .

Security: Most likely
Usability: They've said IE7 will have tabbed browsing and a re-done configuration dialog
Standards: Microsoft has not given a hint yet that they will... so it's unlikely.
Spyware: It really doesn't matter. AIM, Kazaa, and the rest do that anyway.
Kitten Yiffer

Purple wand
Furry moderator
Vivent l'exp����¯�¿�½������©rience de signalisation d'amusement, ou bien !
Level: 135

Posts: 9221/11162
EXP: 28824106
For next: 510899

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 4 min.
Posted on 04-09-05 10:14 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by ||bass
Need I remind everyone that IE is a free product, and atleast for windows users, its difficult to impossible to actually uninstall IE.
Hmm, good that you said "atleast for Windows users." Since the IE for Windows License state that you much have a Windows license. Which make it illegal to run in Linux with WINE, unless you actually do own a Windows license.

I have no reason to even use IE in Linux, while I am a Firefox user I would rather take Opera/Konquerer before IE.

Ah well, I might say. If this is return of the browser wars where each browser adds new HTML tags that dosen't follow the W3C standards... -.-;;; Oh well, some competition can only be good for the consumers right?

IE7 wouldn't be a good reason to buy Longhorn if they kept with the orginal plans. With the lack of WinFS, is there really anything in Longhorn that is intresting enough to buy it? (well, apart from the fact that they probably will abonden WinXP is some point in the future)

I probably would install IE7 to the latest version when it get's released, but I doubt I use it.
Ran-chan

Moldorm
eek, when are they going to stop growing...
Level: 143

Posts: 8925/12781
EXP: 35293588
For next: 538220

Since: 03-15-04
From: Nerima District, Tokyo - Japan

Since last post: 12 hours
Last activity: 12 hours
Posted on 04-10-05 12:00 AM Link | Quote
Just because they update IE it doesn
Tarale
I'm not under the alfluence of incohol like some thinkle peop I am. It's just the drunker I sit here the longer I get.

Level: 73

Posts: 1676/2720
EXP: 3458036
For next: 27832

Since: 03-18-04
From: Adelaide, Australia

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 04-10-05 06:56 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by FreeDOS
Why was this quite old topic bumped?


Youd have to ask Wario21692, he bumped it.

Anyways on the spyware -- the lusers I work for work in a corporate environment where KaZaA, etc generally aren't used. They're blocked at the firewall, for starters, and I don't think the users even know what they are / how to use them. Yet we get a lot of spyware... HotBar is a fan favorite around my work
BMF98567
BLACK HAS BUILT A SILLY DICE-MAZE!
GO!

Current list of BURNING FURY >8( recipients:
- Yiffy Kitten (x2)
- Xkeeper
Level: 53

Posts: 759/1261
EXP: 1094149
For next: 62970

Since: 03-15-04
From: Blobaria
Special Move: Rising Meatloaf Backhand Combo

Since last post: 21 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 04-10-05 12:58 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Kitten Yiffer
Ah well, I might say. If this is return of the browser wars where each browser adds new HTML tags that dosen't follow the W3C standards... -.-;;; Oh well, some competition can only be good for the consumers right?
NO.

If browsers are going to compete, let them compete over secondary functions like interface options and ease of use. The primary function--proper, standards-compliant HTML rendering--must remain intact. Nobody wants to code for 15 different browsers.
Kitten Yiffer

Purple wand
Furry moderator
Vivent l'exp����¯�¿�½������©rience de signalisation d'amusement, ou bien !
Level: 135

Posts: 9232/11162
EXP: 28824106
For next: 510899

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 4 min.
Posted on 04-10-05 05:16 PM Link | Quote
And that's what the W3C standards are for.

...Firefox seems to compete more after following the standards than messing up the others.
HyperLamer
<||bass> and this was the soloution i thought of that was guarinteed to piss off the greatest amount of people

Sesshomaru
Tamaranian

Level: 118

Posts: 4140/8210
EXP: 18171887
For next: 211027

Since: 03-15-04
From: Canada, w00t!
LOL FAD

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 04-11-05 06:56 AM Link | Quote
The whole 'coding for multiple browsers' thing is simple. I write standard HTML, if your browser can't render it right, there's a link at the bottom of my site's main page where you can get a better one. (And no, on the next update which it's desparately in need of but probably won't see for a while, that won't link to Mozilla; rather, the same link at the bottom of the board.)

Originally posted by FreeDOS
They've said IE7 will have tabbed browsing and a re-done configuration dialog

Again? This is one of the things I hate about IE and Windows in general. Every new version has all the dialogs completely rearranged, so you have to find everything all over again.
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Hardware/Software - IE7 Details. | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.007 seconds.