Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
0 user currently in World Affairs / Debate.
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - World Affairs / Debate - Global Warming, Fact or Myth? | |
Pages: 1 2 3 4Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
xXxJebusxXx

Micro-Goomba
Level: 5

Posts: 5/10
EXP: 496
For next: 33

Since: 03-01-05
From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada

Since last post: 239 days
Last activity: 181 days
Posted on 03-03-05 09:37 PM Link | Quote
Well, if global warming happened and all the ice caps melted there would be no land, and i think it is a real danger because of all the things we have done to our ecosystem and how bad the heat in the summer, and the rain that isnt happening is a evident sign. I live in British Columbia and i remember a bit of rain in the summer and i cant remember having a drought when i was younger... But now every summer more forest fires and etc... So I think total global warming is getting closer and closer and we gotta find a way to stop it
The SomerZ
Summer, yay!
Level: 45

Posts: 648/862
EXP: 618182
For next: 41982

Since: 03-15-04
From: Norway

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 03-04-05 03:58 AM Link | Quote
What now? Of course they ain't known by the general public, they're researchers, not rock stars! I can guarantee you, though, that they're good researchers, and heavyweights in scientific circles (they are, after all, put to work by the UN), and what they say is important to the debate over global warming. The fact that they're not known to the general public doesn't matter, they results of their research are definitely results that are listened to.

I must admit, I can't quite see your point here, if only researchers that are known to the public are researchers that are important, or researchers that industry owners or environmentalists will pay attention to, then there are no important researchers out there. You don't become famous over researching global warming...
windwaker

Ball and Chain Trooper
WHY ALL THE MAYONNAISE HATE
Level: 61

Posts: 1248/1797
EXP: 1860597
For next: 15999

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 6 days
Posted on 03-04-05 08:37 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by ||bass
My problem with the whole global warming scare is that there's no proof that the effects of this would be negative.

Anyone know what happened the last time there was a major global warmup? It was called the "Renaissance" some of you may have heard of it.


World heating up = ice melts.

Now, where's the largest collection of ice stored?

Ice age.
Tamarin Calanis

We exist. Earth exists. The universe exists. Do we really need to know why?
Level: 59

Posts: 346/1802
EXP: 1672751
For next: 377

Since: 07-12-04
From: The gas station on the corner...

Since last post: 5 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
Posted on 03-05-05 05:32 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by windwaker

Now, where's the largest collection of ice stored?

Ice age.
You can store ice in a time period?

And really, windwaker, I'm not seeing the point behind your post. You may have been cut off too soon, maybe by parents or pets, or maybe your mistake at the end just killed any meaning in your post.


(edited by Tamarin Calanis on 03-04-05 08:32 PM)
PeterGriffinTheMan

Deddorokku
Level: 29

Posts: 19/425
EXP: 137018
For next: 10867

Since: 03-02-05

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 6 hours
Posted on 03-05-05 05:35 AM Link | Quote
I believe it because in about 50 years or more the world is going to be different. Another reason in Antarctica ice is breaking apart and some other problem. I heard it on the news last year.
Grey the Stampede

Don't mess with powers you don't understand.

And yes. That means donuts.
Level: 82

Posts: 1831/3770
EXP: 5192909
For next: 16318

Since: 06-17-04
From: Kingston, RI, USA, Earth

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 03-05-05 09:52 AM Link | Quote
I think the point of hearing it on the news is that you're allowing yourself to measure the heat in the same way we measure heat with a thermometer, which when it comes to global warming, you just can't do.

Ziff's claim that almost every scientist agrees is pretty solid. Everyone against it has some kind of relation to the energy industry. In 1997, coal produced about 56% of the U.S.'s electricity, and pumped a good 30000+ pounds of CO2 gas into the atmosphere per household per year. That doesn't really seem like much in the grand scheme of things, but when we consider that before the Industrial Revolution CO2 levels were about 3/4 of what they are now, it's a bit of a possibility that modern industry has contributed just a little bit to our warming problem, since CO2 is literally the most common greenhouse gas.

The coal-ition, of course, claims that amount of CO2 gas is a GOOD thing, saying that higher average temperatures will allow people to spend more time outside, and more CO2 will help plants grow.

What they don't admit is that the temperature that rises per year is an AVERAGE, meaning it could stay completely the same around here, and rise about a whole degree or two in the north pole, and people wouldn't notice a damn thing.

They also don't admit that CO2, while being a good plant fertilizer, is not necessarily entirely absorbed by the plants. In fact, many plants have a light phase, where they respire CO2 and breathe out O2, and a dark phase, where they breathe in O2 and breathe out CO2. That, coupled with the oh, say, 100 years it takes for the ocean to absorb released CO2 gas, leads me to believe that the greenhouse skeptics just might be bullshitting us.
Steak

Zora
Level: 35

Posts: 356/507
EXP: 278751
For next: 1185

Since: 03-16-04
From: Ohio University

Since last post: 195 days
Last activity: 195 days
Posted on 03-06-05 01:31 PM Link | Quote
So...now we're talking glaciers, and ice caps.

The Arctic Ice Cap is afloat. Just a large mass of sea ice. That won't affect ocean height significantly...but it will do something different if it's gone. Deep ocean currents, the ones that redistribute heat all over the world, are cooled near the poles. This means the water sinks to the bottom, and flows back to the start point. Without this cooling point, deep ocean currents will not flow as quickly, nor as deeply. This means, for starters, there won't be enough O2 for benthic bacteria to break down dead organisms that sunk to the bottom, and we'll start laying down black shale (and possibly oil shale). Not all that important to the human cause. However, this deadening or slowing of currents also will affect how high lattitudes near oceans receive their warmth. I speak of Western Europe, namely, Great Brittain. If those currents slow enough, Western Europe will receive the kind of cold associated with Canadian areas of the same lattitude.
Geologists have taken declassified data from Cold War nuclear subs (since one of the ideas was to have the subs pop up from under the Arctic Ice Cap, and fire off a number of SLBMs) in regards to the deep ocean currents (since there's a difference in density, slipping between the two throws off sonar detection). The Ice Cap has been thinning. Extrapolation from the data shows that the Arctic Ice Cap will be present during winter only, maybe as soon as 2020, and definately by 2050, unless something changes. That's in our lifetime, folks.
What will become of the oceanic currents...not sure. They may go from the arctic being their cooling point to simply connecting to the start that's somewhere in the Pacific. That'll keep Europe out of the freezer, but will likely in turn increase the general temperature of the oceans. Warmer world. Not necessarily a bad thing, but here's something else to consider. The large storms at sea draw their strength from how deep the warm water below them is. In the modern oceans the temperature plummets at depth of something like 800m (they call this point the thermocline). If the thermocline is deeper, the ocean storms can draw from a deeper column of warm water, and then they come more often, and *bigger*. Meaning, we could start seeing Cat. V Hurricanes more often.

Anarctica has its own circumcontinental deep ocean current that severs it off from the rest of the oceanic currents. It stays cold, though, perhaps not cold enough for our tastes. Anartica has two ice sheets (continental glaciers): Eastern, and Western. The Eastern Antarctic Ice Sheet is stable (for now). The Western, though isn't. I don't remember what all is happening with it...there is a part that's flowing notably faster than the rest of it (ice beyond a certain depth, somethin' like 50m, behaves differently than we're used to seeing. It can flow, among other things). If the whole thing fell in (which thankfully can't happen all at once; the sheet's that friggin' big), sea levels would rise apx. 20m. If all the glaciers of the world (including mountain glaciers, even the ones that are land-locked and have hundreds of miles of river before reaching the ocean) were to melt, the rise would be something like 70m. Again, not likely to happen. Probably won't during our lifetime.

/babbling


Yeah, I know...I'm the resident geologist.
Banedon

Giant Red Paratroopa
Level: 55

Posts: 1045/1408
EXP: 1291380
For next: 22809

Since: 03-15-04
From: Michigan

Since last post: 101 days
Last activity: 90 days
Posted on 03-06-05 04:08 PM Link | Quote
I read an article about this recently...supposedly, global warming is not a product of the industrialization of human society, it began 8000 years ago when humans started farming.

[EDIT: OK, how did the double post actually get through? I thought the board software prevented it from happening...]


(edited by Banedon on 03-06-05 07:10 AM)
windwaker

Ball and Chain Trooper
WHY ALL THE MAYONNAISE HATE
Level: 61

Posts: 1258/1797
EXP: 1860597
For next: 15999

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 6 days
Posted on 03-07-05 04:19 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Tamarin Calanis
Originally posted by windwaker

Now, where's the largest collection of ice stored?

Ice age.
You can store ice in a time period?

And really, windwaker, I'm not seeing the point behind your post. You may have been cut off too soon, maybe by parents or pets, or maybe your mistake at the end just killed any meaning in your post.


No, if the ice cap melts, there would be another ice age, possibly, because of it not only raising the seas with really cold water, it would affect Earth in a few ways.
Steak

Zora
Level: 35

Posts: 357/507
EXP: 278751
For next: 1185

Since: 03-16-04
From: Ohio University

Since last post: 195 days
Last activity: 195 days
Posted on 03-07-05 07:48 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by windwaker
No, if the ice cap melts, there would be another ice age, possibly, because of it not only raising the seas with really cold water, it would affect Earth in a few ways.






...I get the feeling that people here look at the long post and say oh, Steak's just babbling again; just ignore him...nevermind that I actually am majoring in geology, and we go over this stuff in class....
windwaker

Ball and Chain Trooper
WHY ALL THE MAYONNAISE HATE
Level: 61

Posts: 1265/1797
EXP: 1860597
For next: 15999

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 6 days
Posted on 03-07-05 08:07 AM Link | Quote
I read it; I wasn't referring to everywhere. In certain places there would be considerable lower temperature.
Legault

Bot
Level: 24

Posts: 49/269
EXP: 78075
For next: 50

Since: 12-24-04
From: Schools out...YES!!! Summer vacation.

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 4 days
Posted on 03-07-05 05:42 PM Link | Quote
Yeah some places would have a lower temperature but, they would most likely be lowered because they would be either flooded or frozen. However there is a low chance for that to happen anyway. Oh, I just remembered this, The only country that is making the problem of global warming is the United States. So it is all our fault.
neotransotaku

Baby Mario
戻れたら、
誰も気が付く
Level: 87

Posts: 2595/4016
EXP: 6220548
For next: 172226

Since: 03-15-04
From: Outside of Time/Space

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 03-07-05 10:29 PM Link | Quote
"our" fault? Why are you including me into this...I'm not complaining
Dracoon

Zelda
The temp ban/forum ban bypasser!
Level: 84

Posts: 2656/3727
EXP: 5514391
For next: 147561

Since: 03-25-04
From: At home

Since last post: 5 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
Posted on 03-07-05 10:57 PM Link | Quote
United States and Australia dodge Kyoto bullet
Competitive Enterprise Institute, Feb 14 2005
The Competitive Enterprise Institute congratulates the United States and Australia for their leadership in refusing to ratify the fatally flawed and potentially disastrous Kyoto Protocol climate treaty, which is scheduled to enter into force internationally on Wednesday.

Globalwarming.org

They really don't want us to pass that, so even if it is our fault, there is no way we can actually stop it. We halt production, we're screwed, we don't we're screwed... Damn.

Anyways, very interesting, although most people seem to be saying global warming is really going to mess us up with only a few people saying it is natural. This is a hard topic to get both sides on because everyone is promoting a political agenda.
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 3167/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 03-08-05 02:50 AM Link | Quote
Kyoto, although a flawed treatise, is still a good legislative piece as it is incentive based for companies and begins to create declines in pollution through finished products and production processes.
Grey the Stampede

Don't mess with powers you don't understand.

And yes. That means donuts.
Level: 82

Posts: 1856/3770
EXP: 5192909
For next: 16318

Since: 06-17-04
From: Kingston, RI, USA, Earth

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 03-08-05 07:31 AM Link | Quote
It's not entirely America's fault: Countries that are developing industrially have the potential to totally outstrip America in greenhouse gas production.

And didn't China and India, which already house over 1/4 the world's population, fight legislation that would in the very least help to fight pollution on the grounds that it was America's mess and they shouldn't have to clean it up, no matter how much they'd contribute to it in the future? Nice logic, there. Yeah, even though America got caught with its pants down, let's unzip and let it rip!

China and India are going to end up producing more pollution than America ever has once they develop... the least they could do is make sure global warming really is just America's fault by not contributing to it.
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 3176/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 03-08-05 07:45 AM Link | Quote
China, India, Brazil and ESPECIALLY Russia are going to be the biggest polluters with the USA, Britain, Canada, Ukraine and Germany behind them
Kitten Yiffer

Purple wand
Furry moderator
Vivent l'exp����¯�¿�½������©rience de signalisation d'amusement, ou bien !
Level: 135

Posts: 8349/11162
EXP: 28824106
For next: 510899

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 4 min.
Posted on 03-10-05 04:37 AM Link | Quote
Ah, wonderful Germany, UK and Poland.

They shove out their shit, and it rains on our showers. It's said that we are a quite caring people about our nature, but it dosen't help when the shit rains from other countries. ;

It's just not about global warming. :/
HGanon

Red Paragoomba
Level: 12

Posts: 5/59
EXP: 7041
For next: 880

Since: 03-06-05

Since last post: 104 days
Last activity: 9 hours
Posted on 03-10-05 04:54 AM Link | Quote
I don't believe in global warming. At least not anything major.
If there's such a danger, than how is that where I live we're still getting snow? Not to mention that hot areas like Texas got snow last year. It just doesn't seem to add up.

Lots of people's concerns about global warming is that it affects the o-zone layer right? Well, I'm pretty sure that the sun CREATES the o-zone layer, so even if it was damaged, it would just be repaired.
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 3200/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 03-10-05 05:11 AM Link | Quote
No. The SUN DESTROYS THE OZONE WITH ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION!

The primordial planet emitted gases that were held in by gravity that formed the sphere known as the OZONE layer.

And global warming is extremely noticeable. Shorter, milder winters (when my dad was a kid the total temperature was WAY colder). But then, I'm pretty sure that you wouldn't know much about the greenhouse gases...I think I'll let Steak take it away.
Pages: 1 2 3 4Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - World Affairs / Debate - Global Warming, Fact or Myth? | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.014 seconds.