Points of Required Attention™
Please chime in on a proposed restructuring of the ROM hacking sections.
Views: 88,686,188
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search 05-28-24 05:31 PM
Guest: Register | Login

Main - Posts by stag019

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

stag019
Posted on 06-23-07 05:40 AM, in IM A BIG GAY FAG AND REALLY LIKE MEN :) Link | Quote | ID: 48778


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 139/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Posted by HyperHacker
This is why I laughed at those who did dumb shit like this. You knew it'd go back to normal eventually, revealing your identity. In fact I even found a loophole to tell who was who.
I found one, and I saw someone (could have been you) do another.
Watching someone in online.php. Looking at their postcount, compare that to the memberlist. You can find the ID of the person in the memberlist by their picture. Going to that profile, and looking at the last post/last view can reconfirm who it is. (In the instance of multiple people with the same postcount).

stag019
Posted on 06-24-07 02:04 AM, in And now back on topic. Link | Quote | ID: 48985


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 140/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Posted by Z-Bot
You'd think from the name it would inform you of its possibilities.
Like the people here would bother to read that?

stag019
Posted on 06-24-07 07:18 AM, in Shop.php is broken. Link | Quote | ID: 49078


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 141/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Actually, previewing the goggles errored for me too.
onclick='preview(27,240,6,"Xkeeper's goggles")'
That's why, obviously.
Why not change it to this:
onclick="preview(27,240,6,"Xkeeper's goggles")"
But yeah, I also checked this which spits me that SQL error too.
And neither of these only break in IE, NightKev, Xkeeper was just making fun of it because it sucks.

stag019
Posted on 06-24-07 08:14 AM, in Shop.php is broken. Link | Quote | ID: 49097


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 142/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Posted by joe
If I remember correctly, it would work if it was changed to this:
onclick='preview(27,240,6"Xkeeper\'s goggles")'
Adding slashes doesn't fix HTML. Encoding characters do. He could also use ' or '

stag019
Posted on 06-24-07 08:45 AM, in Just a note II Link | Quote | ID: 49109


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 143/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Posted by NightKev
Posted by HyperHacker
While you're at it, how about a rule against having an obnoxiously fucking huge sig? >:

And fix >:?
>:( is needed indeed
But it's already there!

Also, HyperHacker, some of those sigs aren't that bad; what resolution do you use?

stag019
Posted on 06-24-07 09:12 AM, in yo Link | Quote | ID: 49117


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 144/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Posted by Squash Monster
Someone will be along shortly to throw cake at you.


...do we still throw cake at newbies?

Who was it that threw cake at newbies?
Kernal throws cakes at anyone when celebrating something. He hasn't shown up in a day or two though. : /

Welcome, A Hacker.

stag019
Posted on 06-24-07 09:48 AM, in Just a note II Link | Quote | ID: 49129


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 145/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Posted by Mystery Gourmet
As for "stupid posts" Chrsit, can't you people even just scroll down past them? LEARN TO FUCKING IGNORE PEOPLE, MAYBE? GASP, WHAT A NOVEL CONCEPT. YOU COULD NAME IT AFTER ME EVEN.
Only problem is, it would help if you knew how to do it.
Posted by Mystery Gourmet
i'm sick of your fucking whining.

go cry about your grandparents some more, seriously, makes you look really respectable!
This proves you don't.
It's interesting how these quotes came from the same post.

stag019
Posted on 06-25-07 01:20 AM, in Shop.php is broken. Link | Quote | ID: 49210


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 146/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Yes, but you're escaping the HTML quote, not the javascript quote.

<script type="text/javascript">preview(27,240,6'Xkeeper\'s goggles');</script>

Something like that would be a valid escape.

However, because the ' is around the HTML attribute of "onclick", that wouldn't fix it.
onclick='preview(27,240,6"Xkeeper\'s goggles")'
There would still be an error by the s.

Still don't believe me? Try downloading the HTML, and trying the two methods (escaping via HTML encoding and adding slashes). Also, add <base href="http://acmlm.no-ip.org/board/"> if you hate broken images/broken stylesheets.

Also, NightKev, you were wrong. Previewing still works for me. HyperHacker, what did you preview, the goggles? Because they do nothing. Whenever I preview an item that does something to your stats.... it does something to my stats, and shows me with less coins.

Try previewing with the Valkyrie Staff. Do you notice a change in your stats and coins?

stag019
Posted on 06-25-07 06:44 AM, in Shop.php is broken. Link | Quote | ID: 49307


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 147/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Posted by HyperHacker
Posted by joe
Posted by stag019
Yes, but you're escaping the HTML quote, not the javascript quote.
Ah, I see. Then it would be this:

<a href="#status" onclick="preview(367,240,6,'Xkeeper\'s goggles')">

I tried it, it works.

You should know by now this board uses horrible HTML coding.
The quotes around that aren't needed for it to run correctly, and therefore, Acmlm didn't put them in when coding shop.php.

stag019
Posted on 06-26-07 05:18 PM, in PHP: Link to a post Link | Quote | ID: 49777


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 148/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
	if($pid)
{
if(!$ppp) $ppp=($log?$loguser[postsperpage]:20);
$id = mysql_result(mysql_query("SELECT `thread` FROM `posts` WHERE `id` = '$pid'"), 0);
$numposts = mysql_result(mysql_query("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM `posts` WHERE `thread` = '$id' AND `id` < '$pid'"), 0);
$page = floor($numposts / $ppp);
if (!$r)
{
header("Location: thread.php?pid=$pid&r=1#$pid");
die();
}
}
Xkeeper's old code from Inc. 3, which he posted in the announcements.

stag019
Posted on 07-07-07 08:34 AM, in the quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dofa Link | Quote | ID: 52891


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 152/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Second attempt: the quick brown fox jumped over the lazu dogs
Damn, so close again.
Side note, I was once bit by a dofa... I mean dog.

stag019
Posted on 07-07-07 10:54 PM, in Suggestion: do something Link | Quote | ID: 53051


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 153/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Tweaker, it's funny how wrong you are.
How much space something takes up on a server does not mean it will take more of a load on the server.

Either way, it's the same data, whether it be in two or three tables. Technically, Xkeeper's way would make there be less load on the server from not having to sift through all those edits just to find the most recent post.

Also, having an extra table doesn't even take up that much more space, as long as, like I said, it shares the same data.

Following your "let's make there be less data" attitudes, why not just through everything in one huge table, and make a field like for example "indentifier" as to define whether it's a forum, thread, post, user, etc.

Exactly, it just doesn't make sense. And also, each table needs different fields.
In fact, edits need different fields than `posts_text` does. Edits need time, and maybe if they store what user edited it, but for `posts_text`, that information is stored in `posts`.

The only way that logically makes sense is to either:
Follow Xkeeper's method exactly
OR
Forget `posts_text`. Just store the text in there with `posts`, and have the other information for edits in `edits`. That way, you only need to select from one table to get the most recent post, and you have the added benefit of still only using 2 tables.

stag019
Posted on 07-08-07 01:11 AM, in [code] tag, go! Link | Quote | ID: 53081


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 154/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
There seems to be a top and left border, but no others. Make the table class c1?

Also, PHP has a built in highlighter for PHP code only, which shouldn't be too hard to implement at all.

There's a number of limitations to this right now - for instance, it does not bypass wordfilters, emoticons or other code tags; I hope to get this fixed soon though.
I hope that gets fixed soon, as it shows in your example even. ([i] => <i>)

stag019
Posted on 07-09-07 11:47 PM, in [code] tag, go! Link | Quote | ID: 53530


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 155/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Or, you know, use these.
testing some code, testing some code, testing some code, testing some code, testing some code, testing some code, testing some code, testing some code, testing some code, testing some code.


Also, I totally forgot to mention this, but I've been watching new features being implemented, and I've noticed:
The original way of using fonts involved using font-size: user_defined% for the body, and then all other font size changes have been made in terms of em.
Then I noticed, rather than using the sfont class, <small> started to be used places (signatures). Now here, this is defined in points. What's with the inconsistency?

stag019
Posted on 07-11-07 09:44 AM, in [code] tag, go! Link | Quote | ID: 53850


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 156/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Posted by Xkeeper
If you mean my sample code tag, it's just because defining something as 11px was a constant for me (not to big, not too small) and it was just a test because I didn't feel like fucking with %s and ems to get the right size.
No, that's fine and I don't really care about that. Hell, my layout uses a font defined in pixel size. What I was referring to is blackhole89's [code] tag.

<table cellspacing=0 width=90%><tr><td class="b n3"><pre><font style=font-size:9pt;></table>
9 point. Also, I'm curious why the style was applied to a seperate <font> tag rather than just directly to the <pre> tag.
Posted by Xkeeper
Signatures are in <small> tags because.... well, what did you expect me to use? <span class="tiny">? <small> just fits better.
Well, I would use that (sfont though ), but no, I wouldn't expect you to use that.

The only reason I brought it up because they're technically different sizes. Very minuscule at smaller sizes, but making it larger reveals the difference better. Not only that, but which one is bigger or smaller depends on the browser (IE6 and FF2 were different as to which is larger). I'd just recommend changing the CSS to include the both the class and the small tag.
.sfont, small{
font-size: 0.8em;
}


For those of you who want to see the difference:
test
test

<span class="sfont">test</span>
<small>test</small>

stag019
Posted on 07-11-07 10:27 AM, in [code] tag, go! Link | Quote | ID: 53855


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 157/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
I guess Opera makes them the same size. I assume by zoom you mean Opera's zoom feature. Try changing your board's font size setting to 110. See if that makes a difference.
Aparently, I lied. In both FF2 and IE6 <small> is slightly bigger than 0.8 em.
Also, Firefux picture here.

stag019
Posted on 07-18-07 11:13 AM, in Darkdata's style thread Link | Quote | ID: 55887


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 159/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Posted by NightKev
Damn you people and your idiocy, it's all your fault!
Actually, it's mostly HyperHacker's fault, with his pseudo-layout/sidebar.

<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://stag019.net/abii_invert/invert.css">

stag019
Posted on 07-19-07 02:27 AM, in Darkdata's style thread Link | Quote | ID: 56119


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 160/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
I just took the original scheme and inverted it.
I wouldn't mind if you thought the scheme was too bright, but, NightKev, just because it is a lighter scheme doesn't make it bad. Sure, most AB schemes are dark, but that doesn't mean they all should be.

stag019
Posted on 07-19-07 01:02 PM, in Darkdata's style thread Link | Quote | ID: 56229


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 161/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Posted by HyperHacker
Yeah, this is way too bright. Also, <link rel> for external stylesheets = fail, but I guess you can't do much better at the moment.
Yeah, unfortunately it's all I can do. Just curious though, what's wrong with <link rel>. I've heard you say it lags and stuff before, but what makes it any worse than @import ing in a style tag?

Also:

(7:26:40 PM) Xkeeper NaN: and all those stupid LOL SCREW ITH THE THREAD WITH STYLE>< HURRR ones
He really should have just closed this thread. It's been going downhill since the first page, but not one mod has done anything about it.

Grey Mario: I wouldn't mind this being a new theme, but not named "Cheese". I think it should just be called "Invert" or something.

Speaking of that, I made a banner.

stag019
Posted on 07-19-07 01:10 PM, in U SHAL NOW TURN IN 2 UR AVATAR Link | Quote | ID: 56230


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 162/299
EXP: 410647
Next: 30662

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4312 days
Last view: 2199 days
Yay, I get to be dead, and in a smexy marching band outfit.

Also, hasn't anyone mentioned this thread yet?
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


Main - Posts by stag019

Acmlmboard 2.1+4δ (2023-01-15)
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al.

Page rendered in 0.234 seconds. (332KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 136, rows: 168/168, time: 0.223 seconds.