| |||
Views: 88,686,188 |
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search | 05-28-24 05:31 PM |
|
Guest: Register | Login |
Main - Posts by stag019 |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 139/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Posted by HyperHackerI found one, and I saw someone (could have been you) do another. Watching someone in online.php. Looking at their postcount, compare that to the memberlist. You can find the ID of the person in the memberlist by their picture. Going to that profile, and looking at the last post/last view can reconfirm who it is. (In the instance of multiple people with the same postcount). |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 140/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Posted by Z-BotLike the people here would bother to read that? |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 141/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Actually, previewing the goggles errored for me too.
onclick='preview(27,240,6,"Xkeeper's goggles")' That's why, obviously. Why not change it to this: onclick="preview(27,240,6,"Xkeeper's goggles")" But yeah, I also checked this which spits me that SQL error too. And neither of these only break in IE, NightKev, Xkeeper was just making fun of it because it sucks. |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 142/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Posted by joeAdding slashes doesn't fix HTML. Encoding characters do. He could also use ' or ' |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 143/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Posted by NightKevBut it's already there!Posted by HyperHacker>: Also, HyperHacker, some of those sigs aren't that bad; what resolution do you use? |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 144/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Posted by Squash MonsterKernal throws cakes at anyone when celebrating something. He hasn't shown up in a day or two though. : / Welcome, A Hacker. |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 145/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Posted by Mystery GourmetOnly problem is, it would help if you knew how to do it. Posted by Mystery GourmetThis proves you don't. It's interesting how these quotes came from the same post. |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 146/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Yes, but you're escaping the HTML quote, not the javascript quote.
<script type="text/javascript">preview(27,240,6'Xkeeper\'s goggles');</script> Something like that would be a valid escape. However, because the ' is around the HTML attribute of "onclick", that wouldn't fix it. onclick='preview(27,240,6"Xkeeper\'s goggles")' There would still be an error by the s. Still don't believe me? Try downloading the HTML, and trying the two methods (escaping via HTML encoding and adding slashes). Also, add <base href="http://acmlm.no-ip.org/board/"> if you hate broken images/broken stylesheets. Also, NightKev, you were wrong. Previewing still works for me. HyperHacker, what did you preview, the goggles? Because they do nothing. Whenever I preview an item that does something to your stats.... it does something to my stats, and shows me with less coins. Try previewing with the Valkyrie Staff. Do you notice a change in your stats and coins? |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 147/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Posted by HyperHackerYou should know by now this board uses horrible HTML coding.Posted by joePosted by stag019Ah, I see. Then it would be this: The quotes around that aren't needed for it to run correctly, and therefore, Acmlm didn't put them in when coding shop.php. |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 148/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
if($pid)Xkeeper's old code from Inc. 3, which he posted in the announcements. |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 152/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Second attempt: the quick brown fox jumped over the lazu dogs
Damn, so close again. Side note, I was once bit by a dofa... I mean dog. |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 153/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Tweaker, it's funny how wrong you are.
How much space something takes up on a server does not mean it will take more of a load on the server. Either way, it's the same data, whether it be in two or three tables. Technically, Xkeeper's way would make there be less load on the server from not having to sift through all those edits just to find the most recent post. Also, having an extra table doesn't even take up that much more space, as long as, like I said, it shares the same data. Following your "let's make there be less data" attitudes, why not just through everything in one huge table, and make a field like for example "indentifier" as to define whether it's a forum, thread, post, user, etc. Exactly, it just doesn't make sense. And also, each table needs different fields. In fact, edits need different fields than `posts_text` does. Edits need time, and maybe if they store what user edited it, but for `posts_text`, that information is stored in `posts`. The only way that logically makes sense is to either: Follow Xkeeper's method exactly OR Forget `posts_text`. Just store the text in there with `posts`, and have the other information for edits in `edits`. That way, you only need to select from one table to get the most recent post, and you have the added benefit of still only using 2 tables. |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 154/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
There seems to be a top and left border, but no others. Make the table class c1?
Also, PHP has a built in highlighter for PHP code only, which shouldn't be too hard to implement at all. There's a number of limitations to this right now - for instance, it does not bypass wordfilters, emoticons or other code tags; I hope to get this fixed soon though. I hope that gets fixed soon, as it shows in your example even. ([ |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 155/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Or, you know, use these.
Also, I totally forgot to mention this, but I've been watching new features being implemented, and I've noticed: The original way of using fonts involved using font-size: user_defined% for the body, and then all other font size changes have been made in terms of em. Then I noticed, rather than using the sfont class, < |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 156/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Posted by XkeeperNo, that's fine and I don't really care about that. Hell, my layout uses a font defined in pixel size. What I was referring to is blackhole89's [ < 9 point. Also, I'm curious why the style was applied to a seperate < Posted by XkeeperWell, I would use that (sfont though ), but no, I wouldn't expect you to use that. The only reason I brought it up because they're technically different sizes. Very minuscule at smaller sizes, but making it larger reveals the difference better. Not only that, but which one is bigger or smaller depends on the browser (IE6 and FF2 were different as to which is larger). I'd just recommend changing the CSS to include the both the class and the small tag.
For those of you who want to see the difference: test test
|
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 157/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
I guess Opera makes them the same size. I assume by zoom you mean Opera's zoom feature. Try changing your board's font size setting to 110. See if that makes a difference.
Aparently, I lied. In both FF2 and IE6 < Also, Firefux picture here. |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 159/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Posted by NightKevActually, it's mostly HyperHacker's fault, with his pseudo-layout/sidebar.
|
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 160/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
I just took the original scheme and inverted it.
I wouldn't mind if you thought the scheme was too bright, but, NightKev, just because it is a lighter scheme doesn't make it bad. Sure, most AB schemes are dark, but that doesn't mean they all should be. |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 161/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Posted by HyperHackerYeah, unfortunately it's all I can do. Just curious though, what's wrong with < Also: He really should have just closed this thread. It's been going downhill since the first page, but not one mod has done anything about it. Grey Mario: I wouldn't mind this being a new theme, but not named "Cheese". I think it should just be called "Invert" or something. Speaking of that, I made a banner. |
stag019 |
| ||
Snifit Level: 40 Posts: 162/299 EXP: 410647 Next: 30662 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 4312 days Last view: 2199 days |
Yay, I get to be dead, and in a smexy marching band outfit.
Also, hasn't anyone mentioned this thread yet? |
Main - Posts by stag019 |
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al. |
MySQL - queries: 136, rows: 168/168, time: 0.223 seconds. |