 |
|
Main
| FAQ
| Uploader
| IRC chat
| Radio
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Latest posts
| Calendar
| Stats
| Online users
| Search
| |||
| Views: 88,529,910 |
Main
| FAQ
| Uploader
| IRC chat
| Radio
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Latest posts
| Calendar
| Stats
| Online users
| Search
|
05-04-24 07:16 AM |
|
| Guest: Register | Login | |||
| Main - Posts by Xkeeper |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2248/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
Posted by ColinI don't see the reasoning behind a "You can't publish game X" rule. I guess that's what happens when developers can lockdown a system so that it only does what they want it to do -- technically a form of DRM nobody really cares about (go figure). It might just be me, but I don't get it -- isn't the whole idea of an "AO" rating, that a game cannot be bought by minors? The console cos should just allow all non-copyright-infringing, non-pirated, etc games to be published. The lack of support retail should cause developers to look for ways to reduce the rating as it is, without denying us outright if a publisher decides to publish an AO-game. In the event that some activist group calls out GeneriConsoleCo, they can just say that "The sale and restriction of these games is not our problem; retailers and parents should ensure that AO-rated games are not being sold or played by minors." But, you know, nobody has any balls anymore and is willing to just bend over and take what they get. ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2249/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
Posted by KernalSee, it's a "not" symbol placed over a big tr... Oh, forget it. You probably wouldn't get my signature either (albeit it's a much worse pun joke) ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2254/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
Furfag's truck.  ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2255/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
Yeah, it really does give it another feeling entirely. 
____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2256/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
Posted by cpubasic13 
____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2258/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2260/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
Posted by HyperHackerI don't see why you hate them so much; IE's method makes much more sense.Posted by NightKevBecause the developers of IE said "fuck the standards, alt and title are the same thing!" "If there is no title tag nor alt tag, dispaly nothing. If there is an alt tag but no title tag, display the alt tag. If there is no alt, but a title tag, display the title. If there is both an alt and a title tag, display the title." This makes far more sense to me. The standards aren't always the best idea, and there's no real reason to hate just becuase IE kicks the shit out of FF for once. ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2261/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
These posts are worthless, contribute nothing, and (quite often) are there only to stir up shit. From now on, they will be expressly deleted if I come across them. (See also: "QFT" posts.) You know who you are. ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2262/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
Please note that the proper format for a comment tag is:
<!-- this is the comment. --> The end is not --!>. That breaks things. Stop doing it. ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2263/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
You have about an hour to prepare. That is, it goes off at 00:00 PST.
A few people know what it is. We'll see how it goes. ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2264/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
It's nothing destructive.
Just an experiment. ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2265/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
Posted by ?1. No. 2. It depends. 4. This is intentional. ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2266/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
I haven't seen a post consisting of "tldr" recently.
____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2267/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
Welcome.
Q> What's going on? I wanted to try an experiment. Simple enough. Q> So why are we all "Anonymous"? That's the experiment. Q> Our profiles are still there! Yes, but you can't get to them by board-made links anymore. Q> What about private messages? I'm expecting one! Private messages are exempt from the effects. Q> So what if some spammer/idiot comes?! Can you still ban people? Yes. Your username is just hidden temporarily; the board still knows who you are, and I can find out very quickly. Do not think you are immune to bans. Q> I need to contact the admins about something! Our name links will go to our profiles still. You can PM us. Q> What about logging in? "Anonymous" doesn't work! Use your "real" username. Q> How long does this last? Until I wake up tonight. Enjoy. I look forward to the results. ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2268/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
Posted by ?If you require the anonymizer to be off for a period of time while you update a Brain Teaser game, you can ask for temporary removal. I have no problem with this. ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2269/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
I am an administrator.
I watch you, and make sure you do not need banned. In the event you do, I drop a ten-ton weight on you. * Admin nods. ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2270/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
Reminding you all to read this.
Do not think you will not be banned if you act like a moron. ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2271/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
Posted by ?Posted by ?Signs point towards yes.  ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2272/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
Posted by ?Anyone can tell with reasonable intelligence that those IPs are proxies, and if Koit really did re-register, he would hit an IP conflict. It's just someone trying to be funny with proxies, and failing miserably. ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Xkeeper |
| ||
|
Level: 105 Posts: 2273/2846 EXP: 12035760 Next: 226500 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6068 days Last view: 2805 days |
Posted by ?No. Administration links will always go to the correct profile, regular users will not.Posted by ?They all go to Xk's profile. ____________________ I dealt with it. |
| Main - Posts by Xkeeper |
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al. |
|
MySQL - queries: 34, rows: 66/66, time: 0.247 seconds. |
.