Points of Required Attention™
Please chime in on a proposed restructuring of the ROM hacking sections.
Views: 88,666,797
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search 05-26-24 05:16 PM
Guest: Register | Login

Main - Posts by drjayphd

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

drjayphd
Posted on 04-28-07 05:34 PM, in What are you listening to? (PARAGRAPH OR DEATH) Link | Quote | ID: 30901


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 65/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
I blame the lack of posting on my not preparing fries ruling with an iron fist.

np: Gang of Four: "I Love A Man in Uniform"

Specifically, the Return the Gift version, which is miles ahead of the original. Mostly because it doesn't sound nearly as dated. It's a little odd when you remember that the backing vocals during the chorus were sung by women (it's the title), but, hey, that's actually part of why it doesn't sound so early-80's. This version's just live instruments with only a whiff of synth. Much more refreshing, although it could be that it sounds (if this makes sense) cold in a different way. Instead of white-boy disco, this version sounds a lot more live. Probably because the drums don't sound like hot buttered ass.

(Fun fact: Their name doesn't refer to the Maoist Gang of Four, but the four main Structuralist theorists. WHO KNEW?)

drjayphd
Posted on 05-01-07 03:15 AM, in FOX fucking cancelled Drive Link | Quote | ID: 31767


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 66/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
Proof on the Interwebs

Gee, who didn't see that coming. Although it's safe to say it's no Emily's Reasons Why Not.

drjayphd
Posted on 05-02-07 04:37 AM, in Unified Football/Futbol/Soccer Thread Link | Quote | ID: 32182


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 67/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
Posted by Toxic
dis gusting. I hate liverpool and I hate the world right now


I humbly suggest you direct your hate towards Petr Cech. I blame the headgear.

drjayphd
Posted on 05-02-07 04:44 AM, in Gas Boycott Link | Quote | ID: 32189


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 68/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
(sigh) Good to see no one's jumping in to say it's a good idea after this thing's been debunked.

Although some of us basically have to drive ourselves... depending on public transportation's kind of out of the question when I have to cover games, and they're way too far to bike, walk, etc. Necessary evil yes? Maybe biodiesel's a good stopgap option.

drjayphd
Posted on 05-02-07 04:45 AM, in Your Face Link | Quote | ID: 32191


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 69/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
Posted by Jinsei, benevolent star
Posted by dirtbag



Why do you gotta be that guy?


You say that like it's a bad thing.

drjayphd
Posted on 05-05-07 12:23 AM, in Things you hate about certain romhacks. Link | Quote | ID: 32937


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 70/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
Posted by trip dering
You know what I hate? Hacks with "Lost Woods" like sections in them where you end up wandering around for hours and find out that you went nowhere at all... just like "Zelda - Outlands" and that area I posted about in "Stuck in Hack X - Romhacking Edition".

Which, by the way, hasn't been answered yet. Could one of y'all help me?


No. (No, but really, I'm fairly certain the answer's in the game somewhere. It's just been way too long since I played through Outlands.)

drjayphd
Posted on 05-05-07 12:26 AM, in USB wireless adapter as soft AP Link | Quote | ID: 32941


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 71/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
Posted by Xkeeper
Unless you want to go "lololrunninglinuxonarouter hahahaha!!1", then yeah, waste $90 on a Linksys.


I still don't understand the point of doing that. I mean, once you've got it running Linux... what are you supposed to do with it?

drjayphd
Posted on 05-09-07 05:44 AM, in FOX fucking cancelled Drive Link | Quote | ID: 34088


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 72/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
Point of order: The Loop is coming back. I never knew it existed in the first place.

drjayphd
Posted on 05-14-07 05:43 AM, in Cheesecake Link | Quote | ID: 35175


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 73/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
Only been once, in Seattle. Great it was. Although I will be fucked if I have to go all the way to Lawn Guyland to go to one out here.

drjayphd
Posted on 05-14-07 07:08 PM, in Feeding Directions via Bluetooth? Link | Quote | ID: 35250


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 74/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
I just got a TomTom Go 510 (GPS navigation thang), and it is glorious. It'd be even better if I could feed it addresses from my iPaq (HP H5455). Anyone know if this is doable? Both devices have Bluetooth, so that's how I think it's possible. I was hoping I could set up an Excel spreadsheet and just have clickable links that'll send the address, in the right format, to the TomTom. (I've already set up a gigantic sheet for this at work, only it doesn't do the TomTom addresses, just Mapquest, Google, and Yahoo.)

drjayphd
Posted on 05-15-07 05:34 AM, in Feeding Directions via Bluetooth? Link | Quote | ID: 35462


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 75/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
Posted by NightKev
Posted by drjayphd
I just got a TomTom Go 510 (GPS navigation thang), and it is glorious. It'd be even better if I could feed it addresses from my iPaq (HP H5455). Anyone know if this is doable? Both devices have Bluetooth, so that's how I think it's possible. I was hoping I could set up an Excel spreadsheet and just have clickable links that'll send the address, in the right format, to the TomTom. (I've already set up a gigantic sheet for this at work, only it doesn't do the TomTom addresses, just Mapquest, Google, and Yahoo.)
Isn't there a website for the device ("http://tomtom.com" or something?)


Well, yeah, but it says nothing on the subject.

drjayphd
Posted on 05-16-07 01:45 AM, in The NEW General Project Screenshot / Video Thread EX Omega Supreme++ Link | Quote | ID: 35682


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 76/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
Posted by optomon
This was a little more complicated to pull off than it looks. Hopefully it turns out to be something more than a graphics hack.





(ahem)

THIS IS AWESOME! (clap clap clapclapclap)
THIS IS AWESOME! (clap clap clapclapclap)

Does the bunny walk on two legs or something? Or is it half Link's height and twice as wide?

drjayphd
Posted on 05-16-07 01:51 AM, in SMB2 Proto Released Link | Quote | ID: 35684


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 77/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
iamstillhiro? Tweaker? GET A ROOM.

As for the leak, hoo-fuckin'-ray. The real value's in having the physical prototype, not the contents thereof. So long as people are willing to pay out the ass for the proto, who gives a shit if the ROM gets dumped and leaked? It's not even like you could say anything better than "e-peener++" about having owned the prototype, at one point, and not letting the ROM out. Jesu Cristo, grow up and stop flexing nuts.

drjayphd
Posted on 05-16-07 06:57 AM, in SMB2 Proto Released Link | Quote | ID: 35748


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 79/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
Posted by Xkeeper
Prototype carts do lose their value when dumped and released,a ctually, because anyone with an EPROM can make their own, so it's a lot harder to tell if you're a fake or not... not to mention that the lack of "only one in the world who can play it" factor is lost.


Eh, it's not like the prototypes come with certificates of authenticity. Still, how many people out there own EPROM burners, can make fake carts, and would do so? As for the specialness... "e-peener++". Who would really worship you for hoarding it, as opposed to thinking you're a dick?

drjayphd
Posted on 05-16-07 08:21 AM, in SMB2 Proto Released Link | Quote | ID: 35761


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 80/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
Posted by NetSplit
Seriously, many of you people are morons. People collect things, and one of the thrills about collecting is having a unique item that other people do not have. Rare collectibles are prized, and you don't get much rarer than a prototype when it comes to video games. Additionally, when a prototype hasn't been dumped, the game is instantly more desireable to those people who are interested in dumping and releasing ROMs to the public, as well as to other collectors who want the thrill of owning one of the few copies.


So it's more valuable, in part, because a group of people you'll never sell it to want it. Therein comes the "lording over everyone else", which brings us to "e-peener++".

Posted by NetSplit
Collectors typically don't want their prototypes dumped and distributed because it makes them instantly worth less. This is unappealing to someone who spent a considerable amount of money to obtain this rare item. The owner of the SMB2 prototype was a bit better about this than most collectors and let his prototype be dumped so that it could be studied, and eventually he may have released the ROM. If it all worked out and the collector walked away from the whole thing happy in the end, this might have given other collectors who are worried about the ROM of their game falling into the wrong hands a bit more reason to have their prototypes dumped for preservation and study, but assholes like Tweaker had to fuck things up and fuck over the person who was nice enough to allow people to PRESERVE the rare game that he spent a considerable sum of money on. Tweaker, maybe many people who had the ROM shouldn't have had the ROM, but that is no excuse for YOU to be the one who gave it to everyone. You made a shitty move and have hurt the chances of future prototypes being dumped. The owner of the prototype does not owe any of you anything, and it is his right as owner of the game to determine if he wants to have the game distributed or not. He can hoard all he wants, and while you may be unhappy with that, that is his right as owner of the game. By distributing it, he is actually breaking the law, which is even more incentive to 'hoard'.


I'd love to cut out the ad hominems here, but there's good points in here. No, the original owner didn't owe it to anyone to release the ROM. Sure, on a selfish level, I'm happy it got leaked, but I'm not going to say it was the right thing to do. Eh, maybe I'm the weird one for not collecting things that'll go down that far in value because someone let the contents free, but for (not exclusively) going for things that are already frolicking freely.

That said, if you're going to tee off on anyone like that, take it to PM already. Or are we just going to sit here and open fire on someone because he happens to be there and he did something unpopular?

drjayphd
Posted on 05-17-07 10:48 PM, in lol ebay Link | Quote | ID: 36057


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 82/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days


Well, that's not very synergistic of them. >:

drjayphd
Posted on 05-20-07 08:57 AM, in My new fil--erm, drunk posting technique is unstoppable Link | Quote | ID: 36691


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 83/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
Since I'm told that's what all the kids do nowadays, I'm still fairly buzzed right now and I'm posting. I wouldn't be if I didn't end up feeling like a cockblock at the end of the night, but this is going in General, not Anya's. (Also, I'm not using spell-check at all. Dunno what that says about me.)

To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems!

drjayphd
Posted on 05-20-07 10:16 PM, in My new fil--erm, drunk posting technique is unstoppable Link | Quote | ID: 36842


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 84/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
Posted by NightKev
1) Why would this go into Anya/Tarale's Corner (or whatever it's called now)? It should go in fish.
2) "fil--" Hmm?


Un: Because I was going to go into the whole being-a-cockblock. Then I forgot. Yay, malt liquor.
Deux: My New Filing Technique Is Unstoppable

drjayphd
Posted on 05-22-07 05:24 AM, in Heath Ledger as the Joker - First Offical Photo Link | Quote | ID: 37347


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 85/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
Oh bother. ibelieveinharveydenttoo.com seems to be down... Although that sure as hell doesn't seem like a typical 404 page.

Spoiler:
Yes, Joker, I do believe we'll be seeing you in December. (It's amazing what you can find with Notepad and the search/replace option.)

drjayphd
Posted on 05-22-07 08:44 PM, in Feeding Directions via Bluetooth? Link | Quote | ID: 37482


Cheep-cheep
Level: 32

Posts: 86/181
EXP: 193365
Next: 13077

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6127 days
Last view: 2915 days
The TomTom pushing? I thought we were talking about the iPaq pushing addresses. (shrug) Either way, I tried to connect them, and the iPaq said the TomTom didn't have any services the iPaq was interested in. Eh, at least I have an Excel file and can just punch stuff into the TomTom after looking it up.

NightKev: No forums. Asked their support team and I don't think they had a clue what I was asking.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9


Main - Posts by drjayphd

Acmlmboard 2.1+4δ (2023-01-15)
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al.

Page rendered in 0.235 seconds. (330KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 139, rows: 171/171, time: 0.226 seconds.