 |
|
Main
| FAQ
| Uploader
| IRC chat
| Radio
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Latest posts
| Calendar
| Stats
| Online users
| Search
| |||
| Views: 88,560,830 |
Main
| FAQ
| Uploader
| IRC chat
| Radio
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Latest posts
| Calendar
| Stats
| Online users
| Search
|
05-08-24 01:34 PM |
|
| Guest: Register | Login | |||
| 0 users currently in The Landfill | 1 guest |
| Main - The Landfill - [NSFW] Naked Princess Peach F*cks the D*ck Nazis | New thread | Thread closed |
| Hax0rkyo |
| ||
 Micro-Goomba Level: 12 Posts: 14/19 EXP: 6051 Next: 1870 Since: 09-25-09 From: Rand McNally Last post: 3021 days Last view: 3014 days |
Naked Princess Peach Fucks the Dick Nazis has finally been released! It is a hack of Super Mario Bros. It entails Peaches struggles with Dick Nazi Cum addiction, and the lengths she'll go through to get her fix.
*Play through 21 news levels.* These levels have been thoroughly tested and are not your average Kaizo bullshit levels. The difficultly is roughly on par with worlds 6 through 8 of the original Super Mario Bros. *Brand new music by Dr. Floppy! * most tracks in game have been modified, however, Dr. Floppy has arranged 2 new tracks for the game; that are blatantly stolen from other properties! La Bamba by Richie Valens replaces the Starman theme. "Trust Me" from the Terminator 2 OST now plays during most over world sequences. *MMC5 Conversion* The hack utilizes the MMC5 Mapper to allow for extra sound channels in game, animated background elements, and some other behind the scenes features. 
You can download the hack at Baddesthacks.net and Romhacking.net Baddesthacks.net link: http://www.baddesthacks.net/?p=1858 Romhacking.net link: http://www.romhacking.net/hacks/2716/ ____________________ NHMFTDN 64 is coming... |
| MiniCompute |
| ||
 Bubble Level: 66 Posts: 954/981 EXP: 2423821 Next: 38030 Since: 04-25-07 Last post: 501 days Last view: 710 days |
Posted by Hax0rkyo How on earth this man lets your hack into rom hacking section and let you get away with it is beyond me. :/ http://www.romhacking.net/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=5 Will you atleast do a hack that doesn't involve that pornographic, hatefull mess out of it ? |
| Hax0rkyo |
| ||
|
Micro-Goomba Level: 12 Posts: 15/19 EXP: 6051 Next: 1870 Since: 09-25-09 From: Rand McNally Last post: 3021 days Last view: 3014 days |
Posted by Mike-Tech No ____________________ NHMFTDN 64 is coming... |
| Zynk |
| ||
 Purple Leever Level: 32 Posts: 130/209 EXP: 196257 Next: 10185 Since: 10-19-12 Last post: 92 days Last view: 6 days |
Oh bother... ____________________  |
| Hax0rkyo |
|
| Quick Curly |
| ||
 Giant Red Paratroopa Level: 77 Posts: 1331/1443 EXP: 4176712 Next: 14417 Since: 06-15-08 From: Earth Last post: 33 days Last view: 33 days |
Hax0rkyo: You're entitled to your personal opinions, perspectives, and artistic pursuits, but please don't intentionally spam the forum and make personal attacks on other members. You have been warned.
With that said, congratulations on your new release. I've followed the many hosts of "Bad Hacks" over the years. However, you have to expect such responses given the content. While I personally might not necessarily agree with the suggestive natures of the majority of these works (which are at oftentimes simply the same subjects and themes repeated and carried over from one hack to another) I don't try to take them seriously since they're just hacks. However, you're definitely going to offend a lot of people with your personal design choices, and considering how long you've been doing this, you should already know and expect as much by this point. To some degree, part of your goal has to be to incite such negative reactions and criticisms. Nonetheless, it does seem that some work has been put into this hack, despite details of whether or not said content is offensive to people. Dr. Floppy's work is always great to me. It's cool that he contributed new music to this hack. Mike-Tech: After a little searching, I found one of the original recent posts that I remembered seeing from another one of these kinds of hacks being submitted and accepted. I.S.T. explained in this Romhacking.net topic: Posted by "I.S.T. in August 2015"Later on, in this topic: Posted by "I.S.T. in October 2015"I wanted to be able to find one of the posts that I seem to recall better explaining it in so many words, but unfortunately, I can't seem to locate one right now. However, basically, on some level, there's personal freedom and all that. You have the right to your own opinion and choice to disagree with someone else about something, but that doesn't take away their freedom for their own voice and choice to do it, whether it's morally right or wrong and politically correct or not. While you have your right to express your opinion about this specific hack, to be fair and technical, the thread title clearly had a "[NSFW]" tag included, so it was your choice to come into the thread at all. Sometimes, making your voice be heard is worse than not. Sometimes, not saying anything can prove more effective of a point and protest than coming and giving the other person the satisfaction of eliciting any kind of response from their hopeful audience. If you detest these kinds of hacks, you would make more of a point by just ignoring them completely like the majority of other people who simply don't like them. It's doubtful, but perhaps if people don't give them any attention, we won't see these kinds of hacks anymore, because they won't be receiving praise or criticism of any kind, and they might move on to something else. I can understand how there are people who either don't understand and/or can't believe how Romhacking.net can accept such submissions to their site, being one of the main ROM hacking related destinations on the Internet, if not the primary, and deny other submissions for other reasons besides blatantly offensive content. However, what I believe the posted explanation(s) that I was searching for stated was that denying these "Bad Hacks" would result in complaints of an entirely different nature in censorship. Sure, they have their own site, and there are probably more people who disapprove of "Bad Hacks" than not, which means that accepting them is appealing to more of a minority than majority and public-friendly eye, but nonetheless, it's a lose-lose situation. At the end of the day, they exist, and you have complete power in your own life as to whether or not you acknowledge them and allow them to affect your life. |
| Hax0rkyo |
|
| MiniCompute |
| ||
|
Bubble Level: 66 Posts: 956/981 EXP: 2423821 Next: 38030 Since: 04-25-07 Last post: 501 days Last view: 710 days |
If it weren't full of all what he put into in his last 2 hacks, your right I wouldn't need to say anything or have a right to speak.
However his contents is starting a problem over at rhdn and this past holidays it comes back over here and goes too far ?? Thus is why I needed to say that and it is important for him to get that. If he were to do a hack not relating to sex this or sex that, sure I'll play the demo. I hear everything your stating and I have no problems with him or what you say. Somethings shouldn't be posted, no matter what your personal hatred is towards people or groups. As for the book thing, I'll burn it down and keep walking away. Thank you for help curly. |
| Dr. Floppy |
| ||
|
Newcomer Level: 6 Posts: 4/6 EXP: 844 Next: 63 Since: 04-21-15 Last post: 3021 days Last view: 2857 days |
I like pie!!!  |
| MiniCompute |
| ||
|
Bubble Level: 66 Posts: 957/981 EXP: 2423821 Next: 38030 Since: 04-25-07 Last post: 501 days Last view: 710 days |
Posted by Dr. Floppy  *eases back up 500 miles up north* stares at the doc by skype call, you can have it for free + no taxes!
|
| blackhole89 |
| ||
 The Guardian Moloch whose eyes are a thousand blind windows! Level: 124 Posts: 4112/4196 EXP: 21553707 Next: 282894 Since: 02-19-07 From: Ithaca, NY, US Last post: 483 days Last view: 96 days |
|
| Main - The Landfill - [NSFW] Naked Princess Peach F*cks the D*ck Nazis | New thread | Thread closed |
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al. |
|
MySQL - queries: 76, rows: 95/98, time: 0.074 seconds. |