Points of Required Attention™
Please chime in on a proposed restructuring of the ROM hacking sections.
Views: 88,491,816
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search 04-27-24 08:55 AM
Guest: Register | Login

0 users currently in General Chat | 2 guests

Main - General Chat - Debt and Equity New thread | New reply

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Trax
Posted on 08-26-08 05:53 AM Link | Quote | ID: 89466


Yellow Stalfos
Level: 71

Posts: 451/1145
EXP: 3036022
Next: 131092

Since: 07-06-07
From: Québec

Last post: 3628 days
Last view: 2880 days
Here's something:

Suppose Bob lends 20$ to Jerry. In accounting terms, we can say Jerry is at -20$ (debt of 20$) and Bob is at 20$ (equity of 20$). In other words, when anyone contracts a loan, going into negative, another party must go into the positive, to keep balance. Correct me if the terms I used are not exact...

Now, my observation is this: if we take the previous principle as granted, then how can ALL countries in the world be in the negative (debt) at the same time? Most countries in the world are indebted to other countries, and vice-versa. But no country is in the positive balance, as dictacted by the previously stated (mathematical) principle. How are we supposed to repay the debts if EVERYONE is in the negative?


Sukasa
Posted on 08-26-08 05:59 AM Link | Quote | ID: 89467


Red Birdo
Level: 92

Posts: 894/2112
EXP: 7689927
Next: 67010

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4449 days
Last view: 3220 days
Because you're forgetting that countries do not include the personal wealth of their residents in that calculation; The money is in the hands of private interests, not public ones.

There's your simplest answer

KP9000
Posted on 08-26-08 06:39 AM (rev. 2 of 08-26-08 06:40 AM) Link | Quote | ID: 89471


Boomboom

Level: 90

Posts: 396/1975
EXP: 6953859
Next: 234750

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 3581 days
Last view: 3205 days


They say that "95% of the nation's money is in 5% of the nation's population". Which is bullshit, because at 5 percent, one out of 20 people are rich. My ass. In reality, when it comes down to it, in this great fucking country of Almighty America, 20% of the money is in .001 percent of the nation's population the rest is in the government's pocket.

Though, I digress. Debts are directional. If Bob lends $20 to Jerry, then Tom isn't going to pay Bob his money back. It has to be Jerry, unless there is an agreement between the three that Tom will pay Bob the money back. In this case, the money is not paid back but the equity is only transferred. But, Bob gets his money back, and Tom loses some, and has to wait for Jerry to pay him back.

That's also a contributing factor. If anyone could pay off anyone else's debts, somebody's getting fucked.

____________________

Trax
Posted on 08-26-08 06:47 AM Link | Quote | ID: 89472


Yellow Stalfos
Level: 71

Posts: 452/1145
EXP: 3036022
Next: 131092

Since: 07-06-07
From: Québec

Last post: 3628 days
Last view: 2880 days
Posted by Sukasa
Because you're forgetting that countries do not include the personal wealth of their residents in that calculation; The money is in the hands of private interests, not public ones.
There's your simplest answer

Interesting point. But it doesn't mean that the population is indebted towards this 1% (or whatever) of very wealthy people. It just means they hold more money. And for the sake of argument, let's just take governments debts alone. Why aren't there some countries in the - and others in the + ? If two countries own moeny to each other, you should be able to just cancel the difference, no? is there any less simple answer?

If Australia owes Germany 45 billion $, and Germany owes Australia 23 billion $, why not cancel each other like this:

45 - 23 = 22

So, Australia owes Germany 22 billion $ and Germany owes Australia 0...

Sukasa
Posted on 08-26-08 07:06 AM Link | Quote | ID: 89473


Red Birdo
Level: 92

Posts: 895/2112
EXP: 7689927
Next: 67010

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4449 days
Last view: 3220 days
Because generally what one country owes another, and what is owed back, are in completely different categories i.e. Australia might be on the hook for x dollars for y product, but germany might be on the hook for z dollars of b product, and the companies that produce these products each want to see their share of the money.
beyond that, I believe countries like India and China are actually in the black as far as finances go.

blackhole89
Posted on 08-26-08 04:10 PM (rev. 2 of 08-26-08 04:11 PM) Link | Quote | ID: 89489


The Guardian
Moloch whose eyes are a thousand blind windows!
Level: 124

Posts: 1865/4196
EXP: 21534515
Next: 302086

Since: 02-19-07
From: Ithaca, NY, US

Last post: 472 days
Last view: 85 days



Posted by Sukasa
Because you're forgetting that countries do not include the personal wealth of their residents in that calculation; The money is in the hands of private interests, not public ones.

There's your simplest answer

Posted by Trax
Interesting point. But it doesn't mean that the population is indebted towards this 1% (or whatever) of very wealthy people. It just means they hold more money.

Exactly this.
The rich .01% have a lot of money.
The poor rest doesn't have negative amounts in spite of that.
Assuming they don't print their own, the money has got to come from somewhere.
Who's left to consider?
Governments.

____________________



Trax
Posted on 08-26-08 11:39 PM Link | Quote | ID: 89523


Yellow Stalfos
Level: 71

Posts: 454/1145
EXP: 3036022
Next: 131092

Since: 07-06-07
From: Québec

Last post: 3628 days
Last view: 2880 days
And banks... Governement don't usually print money...

NightKev
Posted on 08-27-08 01:54 AM Link | Quote | ID: 89535


Cape Luigi
Level: 131

Posts: 2969/4792
EXP: 26231954
Next: 192666

Since: 03-15-07

Last post: 3735 days
Last view: 3647 days
Posted by Trax
And banks... Governement don't usually print money...
...Uh? The banks don't print the money, the government does.

____________________

Trax
Posted on 08-27-08 08:23 AM Link | Quote | ID: 89542


Yellow Stalfos
Level: 71

Posts: 456/1145
EXP: 3036022
Next: 131092

Since: 07-06-07
From: Québec

Last post: 3628 days
Last view: 2880 days
It's an expression...
Bank of Canada, the Fed, Bank of Europe, etc., are not exactly government, except on paper...

In day-to-day transactions, charter banks don't "print" money with a printer, but they create money in electronic form. That's what I meant by that...

NightKev
Posted on 08-28-08 02:34 AM Link | Quote | ID: 89571


Cape Luigi
Level: 131

Posts: 2971/4792
EXP: 26231954
Next: 192666

Since: 03-15-07

Last post: 3735 days
Last view: 3647 days
No they don't, they can't just put "look we have $1 trillion" into their computers and suddenly poof, they actually have that much. No, they only have what they actually, physically have. Otherwise the economy would collapse and etc etc.

____________________

Trax
Posted on 08-28-08 09:29 AM Link | Quote | ID: 89587


Yellow Stalfos
Level: 71

Posts: 460/1145
EXP: 3036022
Next: 131092

Since: 07-06-07
From: Québec

Last post: 3628 days
Last view: 2880 days
Then, where does the money grow? In a tree? In the ground? In a laboratory?
Where does the money come from when you contract a loan?

NightKev
Posted on 08-29-08 04:00 AM Link | Quote | ID: 89608


Cape Luigi
Level: 131

Posts: 2973/4792
EXP: 26231954
Next: 192666

Since: 03-15-07

Last post: 3735 days
Last view: 3647 days
Gold is the real money, paper money just replaces it.

____________________

Xeruss
Posted on 08-29-08 07:53 PM Link | Quote | ID: 89626


Sledge Brother
Compromised account.
Level: 86

Posts: 479/1815
EXP: 6126224
Next: 15883

Since: 02-19-07
From: Oregon

Last post: 1814 days
Last view: 1813 days
Posted by NightKev
Gold is the real money, paper money just replaces it.

Not since about 1975, in the US at least. Up until that point you could actually exchange cash for gold. I think it occurred after we realized that foreigners had more of our money than we did, and that far too much had been printed.

____________________
Design © 2009 Stark
Once for the Super Dave TV show I was the stuntman that fell down the entire wtc stairwell. ~ jargon

NightKev
Posted on 08-30-08 01:10 AM Link | Quote | ID: 89637


Cape Luigi
Level: 131

Posts: 2974/4792
EXP: 26231954
Next: 192666

Since: 03-15-07

Last post: 3735 days
Last view: 3647 days
If we didn't use paper money, we'd use gold.

____________________

Trax
Posted on 08-30-08 03:52 AM Link | Quote | ID: 89642


Yellow Stalfos
Level: 71

Posts: 463/1145
EXP: 3036022
Next: 131092

Since: 07-06-07
From: Québec

Last post: 3628 days
Last view: 2880 days
It doesn't answer my question, though. When you contract a loan, you don't receive the money in paper form or metal coins, nor do you receive ingots of gold from the bank clerk. It is usually added to your bank account, electronically. So where does this money come from? From what account?

KP9000
Posted on 08-30-08 08:38 PM (rev. 2 of 08-30-08 08:39 PM) Link | Quote | ID: 89656


Boomboom

Level: 90

Posts: 401/1975
EXP: 6953859
Next: 234750

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 3581 days
Last view: 3205 days


The money stays at the bank in precious metal, coin, or paper form. All the electronic part of it does is tell you how much you have, and makes it easier to transfer money.

EDIT: Also gives the bank a good way to charge you for every fucking little thing.

____________________

Trax
Posted on 08-30-08 11:14 PM Link | Quote | ID: 89660


Yellow Stalfos
Level: 71

Posts: 465/1145
EXP: 3036022
Next: 131092

Since: 07-06-07
From: Québec

Last post: 3628 days
Last view: 2880 days
And when I go to the automatic teller machine, and make a withdrawal, I receive paper money, right? It's not in electronic form anymore. Where does it come from? Does the bank have infinite money, like in Monopoly? This means they charge me interest and fees without any risk? I pay for inifinite money?

Talk about fairness...

Ailure
Posted on 08-30-08 11:26 PM Link | Quote | ID: 89661

Hats
Steam Board2 group
Level: 121

Posts: 3049/3965
EXP: 19780558
Next: 276138

Since: 02-19-07
From: Sweden, Skåne

Last post: 3302 days
Last view: 2053 days
Posted by NightKev
If we didn't use paper money, we'd use gold.
And other valuable metals like how it was once in the time

However it started becoming a hassle, and I even recall cases where coins almost became more valuable than the currency they symbolize.

____________________
AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org


Trax
Posted on 08-31-08 01:52 AM Link | Quote | ID: 89679


Yellow Stalfos
Level: 71

Posts: 468/1145
EXP: 3036022
Next: 131092

Since: 07-06-07
From: Québec

Last post: 3628 days
Last view: 2880 days
The major difference between metals and money is that money is not [supposed to be] a merchandisable good, it's just the mean, the record of an amount of work used to buy goods. Metals are goods meant to be extracted, transformed, sold and bought...

Xeruss
Posted on 08-31-08 01:55 AM Link | Quote | ID: 89680


Sledge Brother
Compromised account.
Level: 86

Posts: 485/1815
EXP: 6126224
Next: 15883

Since: 02-19-07
From: Oregon

Last post: 1814 days
Last view: 1813 days
Posted by Ailure
I even recall cases where coins almost became more valuable than the currency they symbolize.

That's why our pennies are no longer copper.
Which is sad, cause it would be a great money making scheme otherwise.

____________________
Design © 2009 Stark
Once for the Super Dave TV show I was the stuntman that fell down the entire wtc stairwell. ~ jargon
Pages: 1 2 3 4


Main - General Chat - Debt and Equity New thread | New reply

Acmlmboard 2.1+4δ (2023-01-15)
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al.

Page rendered in 0.029 seconds. (321KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 122, rows: 150/151, time: 0.018 seconds.