 |
|
Main
| FAQ
| Uploader
| IRC chat
| Radio
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Latest posts
| Calendar
| Stats
| Online users
| Search
| |||
| Views: 88,511,727 |
Main
| FAQ
| Uploader
| IRC chat
| Radio
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Latest posts
| Calendar
| Stats
| Online users
| Search
|
05-02-24 09:45 AM |
|
| Guest: Register | Login | |||
| 0 users currently in Help/Suggestions/Bug Reports | 1 guest |
| Main - Help/Suggestions/Bug Reports - Movement for Realisticly Active Staff [or, new staff plx] | New thread | New reply |
| Should there be a staff reorganization? | |
| Yes! Do it! THIS SECOND! | |
| No, I don't like change. | |
| Multiple voting is not allowed. Changing your vote is allowed. 23 users have voted so far. | |
| Laplace's Demon |
| |||||
 Bloober One over s minus a :> Level: 47 Posts: 329/440 EXP: 731450 Next: 34753 Since: 02-20-07 From: Puerto Rico Last post: 5279 days Last view: 5260 days |
|
|||||
| RomManic |
| ||
 Spiny I've had enough of your garbage. Get out. Level: 53 Posts: 284/578 EXP: 1101390 Next: 55729 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 5386 days Last view: 4306 days |
Ok, well in all seriousness is it possible? I know the general consensus believes otherwise but I suppose it's not up to them but the current staff.
And look seriously. I might get heated about religion, but I do believe in being just. I'd at least stick to adherence of the rules, nothing more. It is no big loss to me if I'm not. |
| Tyty |
| ||
 Vire Jizz Danmaku Level: 77 Posts: 537/1381 EXP: 4047954 Next: 143175 Since: 04-20-07 From: Canada Last post: 4453 days Last view: 3725 days |
Posted by RomManic Let's see how the next 12 hours go. ____________________ |
| chungy |
| ||
 Rex Level: 51 Posts: 226/533 EXP: 960788 Next: 53150 Since: 08-23-07 From: Las Vegas Last post: 4450 days Last view: 4252 days |
Posted by Cirvante I tried that once and it didn't work. 15, years later I still have not received a Red Ryder BB gun under the Christmas tree. I've given up hope by now  |
| pieguy1732 |
| ||
 Ptooie Note: I wasn't here because I wasn't here, not because someone switched the 7 and the 3. Level: 84 Posts: 1293/1711 EXP: 5465282 Next: 196670 Since: 01-04-08 Last post: 5023 days Last view: 4952 days |
With the board's lower-than-before activity I really don't think that this place needs more staff members as of now...  ____________________ "There are 3 types of people in this world: Those who can count and those who can't."  |
| MathOnNapkins |
| ||
 Super Koopa Level: 62 Posts: 508/842 EXP: 1936426 Next: 48260 Since: 02-19-07 From: durff Last post: 4494 days Last view: 4017 days |
No the solution is to make everyone a staff member with full admin powers. It'll be a riot!  ____________________ Zelda Hacking Forum hobbies: delectatio morosa |
| GreyMaria |
| ||
|
>implying even the Japanese understand the Japanese Level: 105 Posts: 1273/2851 EXP: 11926593 Next: 335667 Since: 07-13-07 Last post: 4503 days Last view: 4473 days |
Posted by MathOnNapkins fixed - with EVERYONE admin nobody can do anything to anyone else ____________________ we're currently experiencing some technical difficulties |
| NightKev |
| ||
 Cape Luigi Level: 131 Posts: 2978/4792 EXP: 26242511 Next: 182109 Since: 03-15-07 Last post: 3740 days Last view: 3652 days |
Posted by Grey MarioMost active based on.. what? Most active in the past hour? Day? Week? Month?Posted by MathOnNapkins That list is changing constantly and thus is impossible to use as criteria in such a scenario. ____________________ |
| pieguy1732 |
| ||
|
Ptooie Note: I wasn't here because I wasn't here, not because someone switched the 7 and the 3. Level: 84 Posts: 1295/1711 EXP: 5465282 Next: 196670 Since: 01-04-08 Last post: 5023 days Last view: 4952 days |
I think he means the ten top posters.
In all seriousness, postcount is not a good way to determine staff members... ____________________ "There are 3 types of people in this world: Those who can count and those who can't." |
| Trax |
| ||
 Yellow Stalfos Level: 71 Posts: 482/1145 EXP: 3037267 Next: 129847 Since: 07-06-07 From: Québec Last post: 3633 days Last view: 2885 days |
It all depends on the incentive to get new staff... |
| avm |
| ||
 Red Goomba avm is opposite of zem Level: 17 Posts: 27/43 EXP: 21450 Next: 3293 Since: 06-28-08 Last post: 5678 days Last view: 5655 days |
Is this still even a problem? The activity is so low it seems like two or three people could manage the board without much bother. |
| NightKev |
| ||
|
Cape Luigi Level: 131 Posts: 2989/4792 EXP: 26242511 Next: 182109 Since: 03-15-07 Last post: 3740 days Last view: 3652 days |
Posted by avmThe problem was no staff ever being on, at all. The staff are generally online now, some of the time at least...  ____________________ |
| Kawa |
| ||
 CHIKKN NI A BAAZZKIT!!! 80's Cheerilee is best pony Level: 138 Posts: 1190/5344 EXP: 30959542 Next: 703439 Since: 02-20-07 From: The Netherlands Last post: 4504 days Last view: 2639 days |
When a simple, low-impact change can't be done because the staff member you ask would rather get a second staffer's opinion before he does it while he's the only staff member around, something's wrong. ____________________ Wife make lunch - Shampoo Opera - give it a spin Spare some of your free time? <GreyMaria> I walked around the Lake so many goddamn times that my sex drive was brutally murdered Kawa rocks — byuu |
| NightKev |
| ||
|
Cape Luigi Level: 131 Posts: 2993/4792 EXP: 26242511 Next: 182109 Since: 03-15-07 Last post: 3740 days Last view: 3652 days |
Kawa> BH (or Ailure, doesn't matter) came up with a certain system that's unfortunately broken by design.
Kawa> I can imagine why the system's there, though. Kawa> It just doesn't scale down well. Kawa> Which is crazy, cos most systems don't scale -up-. NightKev>
Kawa> But yeah. Kawa> Asking for the other guys opinion before doing simple, minor things like beating obvious-as-hell trolls doesn't work. Kawa> Regardless of the other guy being there to answer. NightKev> it should be "action first, discussion later" NightKev> that would probably work quite well Kawa> Well, at least for the small things. Kawa> Larger things are what the system's best for. NightKev> mhm Kawa> Like, banning an oldbie that fell to the Dark Side. NightKev> lol Kawa> Or closing/trashing a popular thread for some reason. ____________________ |
| Kawa |
| ||
|
CHIKKN NI A BAAZZKIT!!! 80's Cheerilee is best pony Level: 138 Posts: 1192/5344 EXP: 30959542 Next: 703439 Since: 02-20-07 From: The Netherlands Last post: 4504 days Last view: 2639 days |
Example scenario!
* X registers and posts some okay content. * Suddenly, X trolls. It's just a single post right now but it's a whopper. * System-adhering admin thinks he should stop X right there and clean up, but instead wants to ask another system-adhering admin for his opinion before actually acting. * System-adhering admin has to wait for the other one to actually show up. * X gets the time to make a bigger mess and takes it. * Community gets angry at X -and- the admins. * When finally approved, admin(s) have somewhat more work to do than they would otherwise when it was just a single post. Alternatively... * Non-adhering admin thinks he should stop X right there and clean up, and does so within a few minutes. * Community is happy. * Other, system-adhering admins brand him a rogue, but life goes on anyway. ____________________ Wife make lunch - Shampoo Opera - give it a spin Spare some of your free time? <GreyMaria> I walked around the Lake so many goddamn times that my sex drive was brutally murdered Kawa rocks — byuu |
| Levesque |
| ||
 Red Cheep-cheep Account taken over, please contact admins to reclaim Level: 34 Posts: 65/217 EXP: 242828 Next: 10823 Since: 07-14-08 Last post: 3036 days Last view: 3036 days |
Posted by Kawa Really? I thought it was more like this.... Step One: X Starts Useless Thread Step Two: Thread gets useless discussion. Step Three: Thread gets closed. Step Four: Thread gets opened again one month later. Step Five: See Step Two. My point of view, really. Although, it doesn't always happen. |
| Trax |
| ||
|
Yellow Stalfos Level: 71 Posts: 515/1145 EXP: 3037267 Next: 129847 Since: 07-06-07 From: Québec Last post: 3633 days Last view: 2885 days |
What's the definition of "useful thread" ? |
| Levesque |
| ||
|
Red Cheep-cheep Account taken over, please contact admins to reclaim Level: 34 Posts: 68/217 EXP: 242828 Next: 10823 Since: 07-14-08 Last post: 3036 days Last view: 3036 days |
Posted by Trax Yeah good point. No really useful threads. Although, if they weren't useful in some way, they'd end up deleted. |
| chungy |
| ||
|
Rex Level: 51 Posts: 241/533 EXP: 960788 Next: 53150 Since: 08-23-07 From: Las Vegas Last post: 4450 days Last view: 4252 days |
Posted by Levesque You must be new here. |
| Main - Help/Suggestions/Bug Reports - Movement for Realisticly Active Staff [or, new staff plx] | New thread | New reply |
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al. |
|
MySQL - queries: 114, rows: 142/143, time: 0.021 seconds. |
