Points of Required Attention™
Please chime in on a proposed restructuring of the ROM hacking sections.
Views: 88,520,408
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search 05-03-24 08:06 AM
Guest: Register | Login

Main - Some other Threads lost - C++ vs Java New thread | New reply


C++ vs Java
C++
Java
Multiple voting is not allowed. Changing your vote is allowed. 10 users have voted so far.

Azure
Posted on 09-26-07 08:58 AM Link | Quote | ID: 66461

Newcomer
Level: 8

Posts: 8/8
EXP: 1793
Next: 394

Since: 02-22-07

Last post: 6063 days
Last view: 6121 days

Termingamer2-JD
Posted on 08-20-15 08:53 AM Link | Quote | ID: 160745


Ropa
Banned: repeat sockpuppeting
Level: 53

Posts: 42/739
EXP: 1135096
Next: 22023

Since: 08-06-15
From: England

Last post: 2682 days
Last view: 688 days
C++, Java is shite.

____________________
Jamie Dignam

Quick Curly
Posted on 08-22-15 05:11 AM Link | Quote | ID: 160774


Giant Red Paratroopa
Level: 77

Posts: 1184/1443
EXP: 4174831
Next: 16298

Since: 06-15-08
From: Earth

Last post: 28 days
Last view: 28 days
I took a C++ course online one summer following my last year of college. I don't remember much from it, but I was interested in looking more into program design. I don't really have any personal experiences dealing with Java.

Termingamer2-JD
Posted on 10-16-15 08:20 AM (rev. 2 of 10-16-15 08:21 AM) Link | Quote | ID: 161479


Ropa
Banned: repeat sockpuppeting
Level: 53

Posts: 201/739
EXP: 1135096
Next: 22023

Since: 08-06-15
From: England

Last post: 2682 days
Last view: 688 days
I saw this quote in a site:


If you want to fix errors in Java, don't use Java.


That might say something...

Also, XP doesn't support Java 8 properly anymore.

____________________
Jamie Dignam

Main - Some other Threads lost - C++ vs Java New thread | New reply

Acmlmboard 2.1+4δ (2023-01-15)
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al.

Page rendered in 0.012 seconds. (323KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 51, rows: 65/67, time: 0.007 seconds.