Points of Required Attention™
Please chime in on a proposed restructuring of the ROM hacking sections.
Views: 88,515,557
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search 05-02-24 09:36 PM
Guest: Register | Login

0 users currently in General Chat | 3 guests

Main - General Chat - So how about that merger idea? New thread | New reply

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

cpubasic13
Posted on 08-27-07 12:47 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63815


Lakitu
Level: 52

Posts: 504/555
EXP: 1036364
Next: 47476

Since: 02-19-07
From: Citra, Florida

Last post: 6021 days
Last view: 4452 days
Posted by blackhole89
First off, what do you mean by a "restart"? A wipe would be bad for the sake of said ROM hackers and wouldn't really yield much use other than scaring even more people away. Anything else doesn't deserve grave and important-sounding words like "restart"... (somehow makes me think of a German comic I saw somewhere where a computer addressed its user saying something that could be rendered as "'Reboot' sounds so cold and unpersonal... let's call it a new beginning!")
I meant wipe it clean and start again. I know that the rom hackers need data and that is why if we go through with it we leave a note for them before we restart, proclaiming to save any valuable info they need before this happens. Hell, we have archives of previous board incarnations, we can have an archive of this here as well, perhaps. If we did do this option and things didn't turn out well... er, we can always do option 1 and quickly end it before more drama ensues.


Secondly, why are you so concerned about the community getting some kind of, in the one or other way, "leader"/tyrannical overlord who gets to dictate his opinion? I see no reason why an administration of equals, given an amount of guidelines as a "constitution" agreed upon in the beginning, should not work; it also would minimize the chances of such a case repeating.
I never said have a "tryannical overlord" dictating. We get someone who can manage the staff altogether and make sure nobody does things because they hate the user. The leader, of course, sets guidelines to banning and such and would prevent cases of "I hate so-and-so, therefore he is banned" and I really want to just see everyone enjoy the message board (if one is around). I never said a group couldn't be one leader, but we need someone to get the ball rolling and see how the community would feel about taking everyone at face value.
Let's put it this way: if I didn't step up to the plate and offer this, who the hell would have? A leader isn't one that rules everything and tries to keep all the power to himself, its one that trys to get things done right.


edit2:
"This means that Xkeeper would be unbanned, Grey Mario and the like unbanned (board exploiters banned for obvious reasons still)"
Does building in backdoors, truncating the DB multiple times and flooding 400MB into the PM table not count as board exploiting?
Building in backdoors was when Xk was in power and were for his use only really, and truncating the DB multiple times was just trying to piss you off. I was meaning people that would just exploit for taking passwords and such (see: roger, Spikeman). Those ones banned previously (Xk, Sonicandtails, etc) did exploit the board, yes, but if the board was actually better to their liking (as in, they could enjoy themselves while everyone else does as well) why would they need to do such a thing anymore? With a system that makes sure that we do things by face value, the would-be-staff will need to be talked to as to make sure they understand that this will be a fresh start for everyone and just get over the past. Any more exploiters would be banned on the spot of course.

As stated, you don't have to do this. The "leader" is someone stepping up, saying "Hey, let's fix the problem now" and this occuring. I'd rather have the community decide if this would be good. If they don't, the board can go boom. If they decide to do it, we do it for a bit and if it all goes wrong take it down. Trial run, if you will.

I say we try it. I mean, what the hell is there to lose? The board? People have already stated to shut it down and move on. Let's see how it goes with a different mindset first before doing that. I mean, we are still all here, right? There has to be some hope left if we are still here posting.

____________________

Xenaero
Posted on 08-27-07 12:58 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63818


Ninji
Level: 36

Posts: 195/235
EXP: 285544
Next: 22566

Since: 02-19-07
From: Nethergarde

Last post: 5443 days
Last view: 5245 days
We should attempt one final try on it. Poll the people and see what works, really. I don't see any need to either continue the way things are right now, or just close the board down entirely because of bias against XKeeper or anyone else (You know I'm right).

CPU has the right mind on the idea of a board that everyone can enjoy. I don't see a problem with letting them back here if we create a new incarnation with the whole board and starting from a clean slate. It might be better that way if we sidestep some of the problems that sparked it before. I won't go into detail, but most of you are aware of what those are, as are the ones who matter that I'm really stating this to.

I'd like to see a bit more effort put into the board before declaring it dead. Hopefully cpu can help the community revive, as no one else really wants to help out. : /

____________________
I like gay porn. It's hot

theclaw
Posted on 08-27-07 04:02 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63825


Panser
Level: 42

Posts: 311/348
EXP: 513119
Next: 8243

Since: 03-26-07

Last post: 4167 days
Last view: 2118 days
I'd say the board in it's current state is pretty good! There's been less obvious joke accounts and blatant flaming since the "bomb".

Acmlm and Emuz are decent people. They were just too inactive to honestly be that relevant now.

Xkeeper? I do praise his technical knowledge on the board's code. Although, his random behavior may have been an issue at times.

I'll disagree with the idea of a restart. That tends to end up only scaring more people away. Dedicated users like myself are one exception. We're already on our '4th' incarnation. And there's enough spinoffs as it is since older versions of the board software are free to download/modify.

____________________

Flan
Posted on 08-27-07 04:11 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63827


Level: 82

Posts: 865/1610
EXP: 5120448
Next: 88779

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 3611 days
Last view: 4600 days
Acmlm likes Ragnarok Online.

Xenaero
Posted on 08-27-07 04:19 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63828


Ninji
Level: 36

Posts: 196/235
EXP: 285544
Next: 22566

Since: 02-19-07
From: Nethergarde

Last post: 5443 days
Last view: 5245 days
We don't have to wipe the users, per se.

If we wanted to do a wipe, we could really just do the forums + posts, if we wanted to.

____________________
I like gay porn. It's hot

interdpth
Posted on 08-27-07 05:12 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63836


Buzzy Beetle
Level: 44

Posts: 129/383
EXP: 593971
Next: 17314

Since: 02-22-07

Last post: 4105 days
Last view: 4078 days
wipe everything but romhacking.

____________________
lawl blog

http://interdpths.blogspot.com/

stag019
Posted on 08-27-07 06:05 AM (rev. 2 of 08-27-07 06:15 AM) Link | Quote | ID: 63840


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 181/299
EXP: 409806
Next: 31503

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4286 days
Last view: 2173 days
<blackhole89> {#acmlm} the reason I personally feel uneasy about putting stag in power
<blackhole89> {#acmlm} knuck: thing with the merge is, I don't think many people apart from those who already are on ||board and stag want it
<blackhole89> {#acmlm} and where did stag go

Oh, and if you're curious where I went.
4:30 am - 8:00 am - Sleep
8:00 am - 6:45 pm - Work
6:45 pm - 11:45 pm - More sleep, lulz

Anyone keep IRC logs? Because I don't and my client already removed that shit from the window.

Anyone else also want to state their opinion on seeing me as lead?

Kheiz
Posted on 08-27-07 06:52 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63845


Red Goomba
Banned indefinitely; Xkeeper rereg
Level: 16

Posts: 28/38
EXP: 18317
Next: 1939

Since: 08-06-07

Last post: 6092 days
Last view: 6092 days
I've already stated many times it should just be shut down and finally laid to rest.

Archive only the ROM hacking forums, delete the rest, and just give a link to rhdn.

Destruction is the only way to end this cleanly. Otherwise you get people who are controversial of the current leader, and already a "no-leader" system as now has proved to be ineffective.

chungy
Posted on 08-27-07 06:56 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63846


Rex
Level: 51

Posts: 3/533
EXP: 960827
Next: 53111

Since: 08-23-07
From: Las Vegas

Last post: 4451 days
Last view: 4253 days
(following is the first post I've made in the thread that actually deals with a merger, who knew)

I don't really care weather or not the boards are merged, but it'll probably end up with more work than anyone's going to bother with the databases being merged. If it happens, we'll probably just have a boardhole archive on board.acmlm.org and just post (register if needed) on ||board as it exists now. If the majority of you want a merger, the remaining that object to it will probably just go join Justus 2 anyway (hell, there's already quite a few users moved to Justus 2).

cpubasic13
Posted on 08-27-07 06:56 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63847


Lakitu
Level: 52

Posts: 506/555
EXP: 1036364
Next: 47476

Since: 02-19-07
From: Citra, Florida

Last post: 6021 days
Last view: 4452 days
Hence why we need to discuss it if we were to just do it at face value.

Then again, I can't control what happens to the board since bh is the one running it, so he still technically has the final say.

____________________

Kheiz
Posted on 08-27-07 06:57 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63848


Red Goomba
Banned indefinitely; Xkeeper rereg
Level: 16

Posts: 29/38
EXP: 18317
Next: 1939

Since: 08-06-07

Last post: 6092 days
Last view: 6092 days
Posted by stag019
Anyone else also want to state their opinion on seeing me as lead?
You've hacked the board, abused exploits and javascript, and more.


You being admin is just going to lead to Xkeeper all over again.

stag019
Posted on 08-27-07 06:59 AM (rev. 2 of 08-27-07 06:59 AM) Link | Quote | ID: 63849


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 182/299
EXP: 409806
Next: 31503

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4286 days
Last view: 2173 days
Posted by Kheiz
Posted by stag019
Anyone else also want to state their opinion on seeing me as lead?
You've hacked the board, abused exploits and javascript, and more.


You being admin is just going to lead to Xkeeper all over again.
Javascript? Where?

The only exploits I've abused were to help the board. Like when Ailure couldn't get the database back up a month or so ago. I had to put it up for him.

Get your facts straight.

Kheiz
Posted on 08-27-07 07:01 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63850


Red Goomba
Banned indefinitely; Xkeeper rereg
Level: 16

Posts: 30/38
EXP: 18317
Next: 1939

Since: 08-06-07

Last post: 6092 days
Last view: 6092 days
Posted by stag019
Posted by Kheiz
Posted by stag019
Anyone else also want to state their opinion on seeing me as lead?
You've hacked the board, abused exploits and javascript, and more.


You being admin is just going to lead to Xkeeper all over again.
Javascript? Where?

The only exploits I've abused were to help the board. Like when Ailure couldn't get the database back up a month or so ago. I had to put it up for him.

Get your facts straight.
I fail to see how a complete file manager as well as secret admin access is helping the board

403 denied

stag019
Posted on 08-27-07 07:02 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63851


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 183/299
EXP: 409806
Next: 31503

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4286 days
Last view: 2173 days
As I said before, helping with database backups, people who request password cahnges, etc.
I fail to see how it doesn't help.

Kheiz
Posted on 08-27-07 07:03 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63852


Red Goomba
Banned indefinitely; Xkeeper rereg
Level: 16

Posts: 31/38
EXP: 18317
Next: 1939

Since: 08-06-07

Last post: 6092 days
Last view: 6092 days
Posted by stag019
As I said before, helping with database backups, people who request password cahnges, etc.
I fail to see how it doesn't help.
Secret admin access / security breaching != helping

403 denied

stag019
Posted on 08-27-07 07:05 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63853


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 184/299
EXP: 409806
Next: 31503

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4286 days
Last view: 2173 days
Wow, that's like saying when police break into private property to catch criminals, they're not helping at all.
404 Brain not found.

Kheiz
Posted on 08-27-07 07:06 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63854


Red Goomba
Banned indefinitely; Xkeeper rereg
Level: 16

Posts: 32/38
EXP: 18317
Next: 1939

Since: 08-06-07

Last post: 6092 days
Last view: 6092 days
Posted by stag019
Wow, that's like saying when police break into private property to catch criminals, they're not helping at all.
404 Brain not found.
401 authorization required
100 warrant provided
200 ok

OoBurns
Posted on 08-27-07 07:07 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63855


Boo
Level: 68

Posts: 901/1036
EXP: 2642924
Next: 85876

Since: 02-19-07
From: It is a mystery.

Last post: 5728 days
Last view: 5728 days
I sense a serious amount of 409 Conflict in this thread.

____________________

cpubasic13
Posted on 08-27-07 07:08 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63856


Lakitu
Level: 52

Posts: 507/555
EXP: 1036364
Next: 47476

Since: 02-19-07
From: Citra, Florida

Last post: 6021 days
Last view: 4452 days
Posted by BooUrns
I sense a serious amount of 409 Conflict in this thread.
Oh boy plan 1 looks more and more enticing than ever.

____________________

Kheiz
Posted on 08-27-07 07:08 AM Link | Quote | ID: 63857


Red Goomba
Banned indefinitely; Xkeeper rereg
Level: 16

Posts: 33/38
EXP: 18317
Next: 1939

Since: 08-06-07

Last post: 6092 days
Last view: 6092 days
Posted by BooUrns
I sense a serious amount of 409 Conflict in this thread.
personally I'm expecting 301 Moved. (to trash)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


Main - General Chat - So how about that merger idea? New thread | New reply

Acmlmboard 2.1+4δ (2023-01-15)
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al.

Page rendered in 0.023 seconds. (330KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 122, rows: 150/151, time: 0.014 seconds.