| |||
Views: 88,499,592 |
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search | 04-29-24 06:04 AM |
|
Guest: Register | Login |
0 users currently in Help/Suggestions/Bug Reports | 1 guest |
Main - Help/Suggestions/Bug Reports - Post layout details. | New thread | New reply |
Squash Monster |
| |||
Buster Beetle Level: 48 Posts: 392/469 EXP: 804628 Next: 18915 Since: 02-22-07 From: New York Last post: 5699 days Last view: 5699 days |
|
OoBurns |
| |||
Boo Level: 68 Posts: 879/1036 EXP: 2642157 Next: 86643 Since: 02-19-07 From: It is a mystery. Last post: 5725 days Last view: 5725 days |
|
Stifu |
| ||
Cobrat Level: 56 Posts: 211/666 EXP: 1361596 Next: 36580 Since: 02-22-07 Last post: 688 days Last view: 310 days |
BooUrns: actually, I'm not sure how they did it, but if they made it so layouts are only stored in user profiles rather than in posts too, I think it's better this way... Takes less database space, and updating your layout updates it for all of your posts.
Also, using a somewhat advanced CSS trick, you should be able to have fully opaque text over a semi-transparent background. Doing something like putting the text in a different div than the background, on the right, then position it back to the left. |
Cellar Dweller |
| ||
Snifit Level: 39 Posts: 53/287 EXP: 385273 Next: 19498 Since: 02-19-07 From: Arkansas Last post: 4054 days Last view: 3222 days |
I always liked the non auto updating layouts. It was possible to go into a thread and see the posts as they originally appeared. They don't take up that much space anyway. The 1.9x versions of AcmlmBoard used special tables for post layouts. If the layout for a post matched one of the existing layout text blocks, the post would just refer to the appropriate entry in the table. |
Stifu |
| ||
Cobrat Level: 56 Posts: 212/666 EXP: 1361596 Next: 36580 Since: 02-22-07 Last post: 688 days Last view: 310 days |
Yeah, but change one character in your layout, and it's considered a new one...
Anyway, why should layouts have some kind of "history", while avatars and titles don't, for example ? |
Squash Monster |
| |||
Buster Beetle Level: 48 Posts: 405/469 EXP: 804628 Next: 18915 Since: 02-22-07 From: New York Last post: 5699 days Last view: 5699 days |
|
Kheiz |
| ||
Red Goomba Banned indefinitely; Xkeeper rereg Level: 16 Posts: 5/38 EXP: 18311 Next: 1945 Since: 08-06-07 Last post: 6089 days Last view: 6089 days |
Posted by Stifuit's called a transparent png and there's no css bullshit involved |
Stifu |
| ||
Cobrat Level: 56 Posts: 214/666 EXP: 1361596 Next: 36580 Since: 02-22-07 Last post: 688 days Last view: 310 days |
Posted by Kheiz Yeah, everyone knows about PNG-24... Except it wouldn't work with IE6... but yeah, there are probably very few people who use that here. And if they do, they ought to upgrade, so whatever about them. Working as a webmaster, though, I'm forced to make my stuff work with IE6 (as it's still the most used browser on average), that's why I proposed a more complicated solution in the first place. |
Zem |
| ||
Panser DOOM FOR VON DOOM Level: 42 Posts: 93/343 EXP: 503260 Next: 18102 Since: 02-21-07 Last post: 5516 days Last view: 5514 days |
Posted by Stifu I never quite understood the hatred towards microsoft among the nerd community until I started serious web development not just pngs but all the CSS inconsistencies and bugs and IE7 is even crazier and ghghlghlghlg ____________________ |
Stifu |
| ||
Cobrat Level: 56 Posts: 216/666 EXP: 1361596 Next: 36580 Since: 02-22-07 Last post: 688 days Last view: 310 days |
Nah, actually, although IE7 is also quite flawed, it's still much better than IE6, in my opinion... It supports PNG-24, position:fixed, and more pseudo selectors (like :hover for all tags), among other things... It's definitely a step up from IE6, although it's still far behind other browsers.
Something like 99% of the bugs I encoutered with IE7 are also in IE6. I only found IE7-only bugs on very rare occasions, and they were minor. |
GreyMaria |
| ||
>implying even the Japanese understand the Japanese Level: 105 Posts: 211/2851 EXP: 11923529 Next: 338731 Since: 07-13-07 Last post: 4500 days Last view: 4469 days |
Posted by ZemPosted by Stifu but microsoft is the internet nowadays microsoft invented the internet as we know it ____________________ we're currently experiencing some technical difficulties |
Stifu |
| ||
Cobrat Level: 56 Posts: 217/666 EXP: 1361596 Next: 36580 Since: 02-22-07 Last post: 688 days Last view: 310 days |
Thankfully, IE is starting to sink... And yeah, I'm aware these stats are mostly based on a geek population, which means there are more IE users than that, actually... But it still shows long-term evolutions... |
Ailure |
| ||
Hats Steam Board2 group Level: 121 Posts: 1439/3965 EXP: 19783522 Next: 273174 Since: 02-19-07 From: Sweden, Skåne Last post: 3304 days Last view: 2055 days |
For me, in that table it also seems more like that IE7 is sucking users from IE6 and IE(people actually still use it?)5 in year 2007. Would be more intresting if the stats was combined for similar browsers, such as all IE browsers being combined. ____________________ AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org
|
Stifu |
| ||
Cobrat Level: 56 Posts: 218/666 EXP: 1361596 Next: 36580 Since: 02-22-07 Last post: 688 days Last view: 310 days |
The majority of IE6 users move to IE7, yeah. But if you combine the different IE versions together, you get those figures...
July 2007 - IE: 58.5% July 2006 - IE: 62.4% July 2005 - IE: 75.5% The release of IE7 helped Microsoft slow down a bit the migration from IE to other browsers. And it's interesting to know the part of IE 6/7 users, rather than having all of them combined, considering IE7 isn't as bad as IE6. But that site could have some kind of "flexible" table, where visitors could combine/uncombine the different IE versions at will. I guess that'd make everyone happy. |
Kheiz |
| ||
Red Goomba Banned indefinitely; Xkeeper rereg Level: 16 Posts: 6/38 EXP: 18311 Next: 1945 Since: 08-06-07 Last post: 6089 days Last view: 6089 days |
Posted by StifuPNG-24 is just a standard RGB PNG that IE works fine withPosted by Kheiz you are thinking of PNG-32 (RGBA) PNG as a "web developer" it's kind of a shock that you could goof up something so simple |
Stifu |
| ||
Cobrat Level: 56 Posts: 219/666 EXP: 1361596 Next: 36580 Since: 02-22-07 Last post: 688 days Last view: 310 days |
Boy, you sure are loud mouthed... I'm calling them PNG-24 because that's what Photoshop calls them, that's it. But if you'd like to draw conclusions about my skills as a webmaster from that detail, go ahead. |
Main - Help/Suggestions/Bug Reports - Post layout details. | New thread | New reply |
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al. |
MySQL - queries: 97, rows: 121/122, time: 0.018 seconds. |