Points of Required Attention™
Please chime in on a proposed restructuring of the ROM hacking sections.
Views: 88,497,983
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search 04-28-24 10:38 PM
Guest: Register | Login

0 users currently in Spatula | 2 guests

Main - Spatula - Darkdata's style thread New thread | New reply

Pages: 1 2 3 4

HyperHacker
Posted on 07-15-07 01:37 AM Link | Quote | ID: 55079

...
Level: 73

Posts: 1147/1220
EXP: 3367456
Next: 118412

Since: 03-25-07
From: no

Last post: 6094 days
Last view: 6077 days
Posted by NightKev
Fucking hell people, you're making it worse. We're supposed to make a GOOD theme. Now start fixing your posts
This is the kind of crap you get when a bunch of random people all throw their own code into a theme.

Electrometer Prime
Posted on 07-15-07 04:35 AM Link | Quote | ID: 55090


Red Cheep-cheep
Level: 35

Posts: 124/221
EXP: 260287
Next: 19649

Since: 02-21-07

Last post: 4449 days
Last view: 4448 days
oh wow. This thread is serious win.

____________________

Metal_Man88
Posted on 07-15-07 06:19 AM Link | Quote | ID: 55098


Level: 48

Posts: 414/458
EXP: 776651
Next: 46892

Since: 02-19-07
From: The Void

Last post: 3033 days
Last view: 3032 days
There's a reason Darkdata didn't post this here in the first place, Nightkev. :p

NightKev
Posted on 07-15-07 07:22 AM Link | Quote | ID: 55134


Cape Luigi
Level: 131

Posts: 1583/4792
EXP: 26235249
Next: 189371

Since: 03-15-07

Last post: 3737 days
Last view: 3649 days
Posted by Metal_Man88
There's a reason Darkdata didn't post this here in the first place, Nightkev. :p
I know. I was hoping there was a small chance this would be a good thread but nooooo of course not.

____________________

Trax
Posted on 07-18-07 06:11 AM Link | Quote | ID: 55838


Yellow Stalfos
Level: 71

Posts: 52/1145
EXP: 3036411
Next: 130703

Since: 07-06-07
From: Québec

Last post: 3629 days
Last view: 2881 days
I think NightKey shouldn't take it too seriously either...
But feel free to create another with clear rules...

Skreeny
Posted on 07-18-07 06:15 AM Link | Quote | ID: 55840


Cobrat
Level: 56

Posts: 390/653
EXP: 1322010
Next: 76166

Since: 02-21-07

Last post: 5343 days
Last view: 4844 days
He can't any more.
Stag, this is pwn. Total pwn.

____________________
we're currently experiencing some technical difficulties

Metal_Man88
Posted on 07-18-07 10:56 PM Link | Quote | ID: 56039


Level: 48

Posts: 431/458
EXP: 776651
Next: 46892

Since: 02-19-07
From: The Void

Last post: 3033 days
Last view: 3032 days
Isn't it dumb to expect idiots not to mess up in the first place?

NightKev
Posted on 07-18-07 11:46 PM Link | Quote | ID: 56055


Cape Luigi
Level: 131

Posts: 1610/4792
EXP: 26235249
Next: 189371

Since: 03-15-07

Last post: 3737 days
Last view: 3649 days
Not too bad stag, but it's bright, and bright=bad

____________________

TheGreatGuy
Posted on 07-19-07 12:08 AM (rev. 2 of 07-19-07 12:08 AM) Link | Quote | ID: 56065


Beezo
Level: 49

Posts: 416/480
EXP: 831647
Next: 52236

Since: 03-15-07

Last post: 5770 days
Last view: 5635 days
Wait, we got style disabled again?! Saddening, though this "style" is very nice, I agree that it's too bright. Still, we got it disabled AGAIN, this doesn't exactly reflect very positively on us.

____________________
There are things I want to put here. Like a cool picture, my 8-bit theatre character test result, my MS and RO characters... But it's 12 AM, and I'm sleepy.

NightKev
Posted on 07-19-07 12:09 AM Link | Quote | ID: 56067


Cape Luigi
Level: 131

Posts: 1612/4792
EXP: 26235249
Next: 189371

Since: 03-15-07

Last post: 3737 days
Last view: 3649 days
Posted by TheGreatGuy
Wait, we got style disabled again?! Saddening, though this "style" is very nice, I agree that it's too bright. Still, we got it disabled AGAIN, this doesn't exactly reflect very positively on us.
Apparently it was all HH's fault, so says staggy.

____________________

Skreeny
Posted on 07-19-07 01:46 AM Link | Quote | ID: 56109


Cobrat
Level: 56

Posts: 396/653
EXP: 1322010
Next: 76166

Since: 02-21-07

Last post: 5343 days
Last view: 4844 days
Official word is...

Posted by Xkeeper
In other news, not really a staff update, but I disabled the fucking <style> tag after someone broke the living shit out of his post with it.

Combine that with all the various problems with it recently, and feh, good bye.

stag019
Posted on 07-19-07 02:27 AM Link | Quote | ID: 56119


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 160/299
EXP: 409677
Next: 31632

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4282 days
Last view: 2169 days
I just took the original scheme and inverted it.
I wouldn't mind if you thought the scheme was too bright, but, NightKev, just because it is a lighter scheme doesn't make it bad. Sure, most AB schemes are dark, but that doesn't mean they all should be.

NightKev
Posted on 07-19-07 02:29 AM Link | Quote | ID: 56120


Cape Luigi
Level: 131

Posts: 1624/4792
EXP: 26235249
Next: 189371

Since: 03-15-07

Last post: 3737 days
Last view: 3649 days
Well for me, I just don't really like bright schemes on anything. On IRC and the board I've chosen dark schemes, and I do that at most places where I can.

____________________

HyperHacker
Posted on 07-19-07 03:17 AM (rev. 3 of 07-19-07 03:29 AM) Link | Quote | ID: 56137

...
Level: 73

Posts: 1166/1220
EXP: 3367456
Next: 118412

Since: 03-25-07
From: no

Last post: 6094 days
Last view: 6077 days
Yeah, this is way too bright. Also, <link rel> for external stylesheets = fail, but I guess you can't do much better at the moment.

Posted by Skreeny
Official word is...

Posted by Xkeeper
In other news, not really a staff update, but I disabled the fucking <style> tag after someone broke the living shit out of his post with it.

Combine that with all the various problems with it recently, and feh, good bye.

Funny, that screenshot looks fine to me. I mean the text colours needed tweaking, and the image didn't fill the entire left column sometimes for some reason, but besides that...

Not like someone couldn't have simply removed the code (which they did, and didn't bother to so much as leave an explanation).

[edit]

(7:25:05 PM) Hyp3rHax0r: so...
(7:25:12 PM) Hyp3rHax0r: http://xkeeper.shacknet.nu:5/docs/phucked.jpg just what exactly is broken here?
(7:25:25 PM) Xkeeper NaN: the whole post background? nearly unreadable?
(7:25:39 PM) Hyp3rHax0r: yeah, I know that needed to be darkened
(7:26:01 PM) Xkeeper NaN: and rest assure
(7:26:05 PM) Xkeeper NaN: you were not the only reason I nuked
I nominate stag019's .css as a new theme called "Cheese"

____________________
we're currently experiencing some technical difficulties

stag019
Posted on 07-19-07 01:02 PM Link | Quote | ID: 56229


Snifit
Level: 40

Posts: 161/299
EXP: 409677
Next: 31632

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4282 days
Last view: 2169 days
Posted by HyperHacker
Yeah, this is way too bright. Also, <link rel> for external stylesheets = fail, but I guess you can't do much better at the moment.
Yeah, unfortunately it's all I can do. Just curious though, what's wrong with <link rel>. I've heard you say it lags and stuff before, but what makes it any worse than @import ing in a style tag?

Also:

(7:26:40 PM) Xkeeper NaN: and all those stupid LOL SCREW ITH THE THREAD WITH STYLE>< HURRR ones
He really should have just closed this thread. It's been going downhill since the first page, but not one mod has done anything about it.

Grey Mario: I wouldn't mind this being a new theme, but not named "Cheese". I think it should just be called "Invert" or something.

Speaking of that, I made a banner.
Pages: 1 2 3 4


Main - Spatula - Darkdata's style thread New thread | New reply

Acmlmboard 2.1+4δ (2023-01-15)
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al.

Page rendered in 0.034 seconds. (324KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 102, rows: 130/131, time: 0.019 seconds.