Points of Required Attention™
Please chime in on a proposed restructuring of the ROM hacking sections.
Views: 88,512,838
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search 05-02-24 02:19 PM
Guest: Register | Login

0 users currently in Computing | 1 guest

Main - Computing - DirectX 10 CPU New thread | New reply


Jin Dogan
Posted on 06-09-07 08:54 PM Link | Quote | ID: 44006


Snifit
Level: 38

Posts: 109/277
EXP: 364720
Next: 5727

Since: 03-14-07

Last post: 5801 days
Last view: 4337 days
I know that the CPU is very important in a system and it's also quite hard to tell which is the best and what to look for. Hopefully I will be able to buy parts for a new computer by the fall for directx10 games and other high end graphics games(my current video card is only a radeon x800). I need some help in what I should look for. I've seen that dual core processors can run anywhere up to $900. It's really confusing for me and I'd appreciate any help. Thanks.

BMF54123
Posted on 06-10-07 01:44 AM Link | Quote | ID: 44068


Buzzy Beetle
Level: 44

Posts: 289/375
EXP: 575582
Next: 35703

Since: 02-19-07
From: [citation needed]

Last post: 6092 days
Last view: 6092 days
My Athlon 64 X2 4200+ cost me a little over $100. I dunno where you're getting $900, unless you're looking at high-end Opterons or something.

____________________
[citation needed]

Hiryuu
Posted on 06-10-07 05:43 AM Link | Quote | ID: 44124

Done.
Level: 79

Posts: 858/1471
EXP: 4471746
Next: 107721

Since: 02-19-07
From: ???

Last post: 6092 days
Last view: 6085 days
He wants bleeding-edge apparently.

Jin Dogan
Posted on 06-10-07 06:22 AM Link | Quote | ID: 44155


Snifit
Level: 38

Posts: 110/277
EXP: 364720
Next: 5727

Since: 03-14-07

Last post: 5801 days
Last view: 4337 days
Ok, like this one right here:

is 1295.

But I can't tell it apart from this one

which is a little over 100.

Deleted User
Posted on 06-10-07 06:30 AM Link | Quote | ID: 44162


Shyguy
Original user deleted
Level: 24

Posts: 6/94
EXP: 72094
Next: 6031

Since: 03-15-07

Last post: 6257 days
Last view: 6257 days
Wait, what? Those two CPUs are not similar, not at all. Different companies, one is 2.93 Ghz per core, the other is 2.6 Ghz, and the intel is a quad-core, the other dual, how can you not tell them apart? Also, the specifications tab is your friend, it lists everything. The intel one is rediculously more powerful than the athlon one. Which is why it costs around 9X as much. Maybe I misunderstood, but those two, are completely different.

Hiryuu
Posted on 06-10-07 06:31 AM Link | Quote | ID: 44163

Done.
Level: 79

Posts: 870/1471
EXP: 4471746
Next: 107721

Since: 02-19-07
From: ???

Last post: 6092 days
Last view: 6085 days
Top:
Quad-core @ 2.93GHz
-No- Hyper-Threading Support.
Larger L2 cache by a margin of 4:1. Which I guess isn't surprising.
No processor fan or cooling system...and for something that powerful, it's gonna need quite a bit.

Bottom:
Dual-core @ 2.6GHz 5200+ (better than BMF's)
Hyper-Transport supported.
Comes with heatsink and fan.
More. Than. Enough.

I would seriously be on that bottom one 100x more than the top.

Deleted User
Posted on 06-10-07 06:37 AM Link | Quote | ID: 44166


Shyguy
Original user deleted
Level: 24

Posts: 7/94
EXP: 72094
Next: 6031

Since: 03-15-07

Last post: 6257 days
Last view: 6257 days
I never mentioned that the intel was a better deal, not by a large margin, it has more brute-force, but that's about it. Free cooling is always good, and so is hyper-threading. It would run faster, but it's not worth it. I should have mentioned that. *is an idiot.*

Hiryuu
Posted on 06-10-07 06:39 AM Link | Quote | ID: 44168

Done.
Level: 79

Posts: 872/1471
EXP: 4471746
Next: 107721

Since: 02-19-07
From: ???

Last post: 6092 days
Last view: 6085 days
I didn't see your post.

Honestly, the top one would beat it out...but it's cost-effectiveness; the top one doesn't have it and it's ludicrous to pay 1300 bucks for a block when you have something that costs 100 and does the job -and- has all the extras to go with it.

Which ironically makes the lesser model a superior product.

Ailure
Posted on 06-10-07 02:15 PM Link | Quote | ID: 44210

Hats
Steam Board2 group
Level: 121

Posts: 922/3965
EXP: 19788789
Next: 267907

Since: 02-19-07
From: Sweden, Skåne

Last post: 3307 days
Last view: 2058 days
Hey, I have that 2.6 GHZ dual-core processor.

It's great. I probably would recommend buying it over the overly expensive one. I yet have to get into a situation where my CPU is the bottleneck. And it being dual-core is just pure awesome...

I don't really think that the other processor is 9x more powerful as someone say. Also multicore processors only benefits when there's several threads that requires lots of CPU time. Dual-core helps lots performance wise as a thread can go really greedy without slowing down the system but... I'm not sure if Quad core makes really that huge difference as dualcore does. Very few programs are pure multi-threaded for some reason... (come on, it's not really THAT hard programming-wise)

____________________
AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org


Xeon
Posted on 06-11-07 09:36 PM (rev. 2 of 06-11-07 09:37 PM) Link | Quote | ID: 44591


Red Paratroopa
Level: 31

Posts: 93/174
EXP: 181663
Next: 3700

Since: 03-09-07

Last post: 6026 days
Last view: 3228 days
I hate to say it, but if you plan on running DirectX 10 games, its not just the processor you should be worrying about, its the video card. Your going to need to get a new video card, one that supports the new DirectX 10 pixel shaders.

Although I wouldn't buy ATI...they have fucked me over many times in the past, and I know not to buy from them anymore.

Posted by Ailure
Very few programs are pure multi-threaded for some reason... (come on, it's not really THAT hard programming-wise)


I beg to differ, implementing multi threading correctly is sometimes a nightmare of biblical proportions.

Jin Dogan
Posted on 06-11-07 11:07 PM Link | Quote | ID: 44603


Snifit
Level: 38

Posts: 114/277
EXP: 364720
Next: 5727

Since: 03-14-07

Last post: 5801 days
Last view: 4337 days
Posted by Xeon
I hate to say it, but if you plan on running DirectX 10 games, its not just the processor you should be worrying about, its the video card. Your going to need to get a new video card, one that supports the new DirectX 10 pixel shaders.


Well yea, but my current cpu can't support the games, it barely runs some of the ones out now. ATI's 2900 XT HD is cooler than the nvidia 8800 series but I think I can wait until heat isn't so much of an issue.

Hiryuu
Posted on 06-12-07 04:55 AM Link | Quote | ID: 44683

Done.
Level: 79

Posts: 882/1471
EXP: 4471746
Next: 107721

Since: 02-19-07
From: ???

Last post: 6092 days
Last view: 6085 days
Just have a couple gigs of RAM and the shaders necessary with a decent size RAM on the chip and hope the hell it cools well enough.

Jin Dogan
Posted on 06-12-07 05:07 PM Link | Quote | ID: 44774


Snifit
Level: 38

Posts: 115/277
EXP: 364720
Next: 5727

Since: 03-14-07

Last post: 5801 days
Last view: 4337 days
You mean make sure I have the latest shader software for the video card?

2 GB DDR2 is fine, right?

theclaw
Posted on 06-12-07 05:32 PM Link | Quote | ID: 44777


Panser
Level: 42

Posts: 123/348
EXP: 513107
Next: 8255

Since: 03-26-07

Last post: 4167 days
Last view: 2118 days
2 GB DDR2 should be fine. I have that amount myself.

It isn't a 'software' issue, ATI was late adopting Shader Model 3 in their hardware. Any program requiring it won't run on the x700/x800/x850 family for example.

____________________

Jin Dogan
Posted on 06-12-07 09:27 PM Link | Quote | ID: 44803


Snifit
Level: 38

Posts: 116/277
EXP: 364720
Next: 5727

Since: 03-14-07

Last post: 5801 days
Last view: 4337 days
Ah, and DirectX10 uses Shader 4.

Main - Computing - DirectX 10 CPU New thread | New reply

Acmlmboard 2.1+4δ (2023-01-15)
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al.

Page rendered in 0.025 seconds. (321KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 82, rows: 105/106, time: 0.017 seconds.