Points of Required Attention™
Please chime in on a proposed restructuring of the ROM hacking sections.
Views: 88,501,910
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search 04-29-24 06:01 PM
Guest: Register | Login

0 users currently in Computing | 2 guests

Main - Computing - How much would you pay... New thread | New reply

Pages: 1 2

Hiryuu
Posted on 06-07-07 06:55 AM Link | Quote | ID: 43229

Done.
Level: 79

Posts: 830/1471
EXP: 4470733
Next: 108734

Since: 02-19-07
From: ???

Last post: 6089 days
Last view: 6082 days
Chip's Challenge will never die.

OoBurns
Posted on 06-07-07 08:11 AM Link | Quote | ID: 43241


Boo
Level: 68

Posts: 661/1036
EXP: 2642262
Next: 86538

Since: 02-19-07
From: It is a mystery.

Last post: 5725 days
Last view: 5725 days
I still have Chip's Challenge, along with the rest of the Entertainment Pack, on my computer, and they run fine on XP. Amazing what you can do with just 16 colors.

____________________

Hiryuu
Posted on 06-07-07 08:27 AM Link | Quote | ID: 43243

Done.
Level: 79

Posts: 833/1471
EXP: 4470733
Next: 108734

Since: 02-19-07
From: ???

Last post: 6089 days
Last view: 6082 days
Posted by BooUrns
...Amazing what you can do with just 16 colors.


setz is the forum leader on that last I checked...and yea, it just goes to show you what we rely on in terms of color anymore.

Skreeny
Posted on 06-07-07 10:14 AM Link | Quote | ID: 43254


Cobrat
Level: 56

Posts: 179/653
EXP: 1322095
Next: 76081

Since: 02-21-07

Last post: 5344 days
Last view: 4845 days
In a way, I preferred the DOS version of Chip's Challenge over the Windows one. Slightly less pretty graphics (in a way), but far more animated.

And I liked the freaky water.

Drag
Posted on 06-07-07 08:08 PM Link | Quote | ID: 43313


Spike
Dragon
Level: 57

Posts: 511/705
EXP: 1483363
Next: 2565

Since: 02-19-07
From:

Last post: 3931 days
Last view: 3931 days
It's so funny to see (now outdated) technologies be so expensive in the past, but you probably could purchase them for $40 today. Back then, PCs were a novel technology and electronics were more expensive than they are now.

We threw out all of our old computers... I had one of these, and I'm sad that I let my parents throw it out. None of my other old computers are gone though, just that one.

We also have a PC Jr. laying around here somewhere. (Or at least, we used to have one)

However, I still do have my commodore 128 (which I only have commodore 64 games for )

Is that Windows 2.0 on the screen?

____________________

Katelyn
Posted on 06-08-07 12:13 AM Link | Quote | ID: 43380

beh
Level: 86

Posts: 1687/1816
EXP: 6131511
Next: 10596

Since: 02-21-07

Last post: 6149 days
Last view: 6149 days
Chip's Challenge is fun, I liked that game

My favourite WEP games are probably Taipei (Mahjong solitaire), Chip's Challenge, and JezzBall

xpCynic
Posted on 06-08-07 12:35 AM Link | Quote | ID: 43391


Panser
Smooth.
Level: 42

Posts: 163/344
EXP: 505591
Next: 15771

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4989 days
Last view: 4989 days
I got bored of Chip's Challenge actually. My grandma used to play Taipei and I played it a little too.

Drag: I think that's actually Windows 1.0. 2.0 is mostly blue, 1.0 is the ugly one

Kernal
Posted on 06-08-07 12:39 AM Link | Quote | ID: 43392

Gone
Level: 88

Posts: 1760/1881
EXP: 6463888
Next: 186776

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6150 days
Last view: 6140 days
I never had those entertainment packs...apparently they came with computers from normal companies like Dell, but my parents always bought computers from these weird local upstarts that probably consisted of one 15-year-old making 10 computers a year and didn't bother putting anything on them other than an OS.

Hiryuu
Posted on 06-08-07 12:47 AM Link | Quote | ID: 43396

Done.
Level: 79

Posts: 836/1471
EXP: 4470733
Next: 108734

Since: 02-19-07
From: ???

Last post: 6089 days
Last view: 6082 days
Actually, I think that's 3.0. It looks strikingly familiar to it.

Windows 2.0 was dubbed Windows/286. 3.0 for a 386? Possibility.

xpCynic
Posted on 06-08-07 12:52 AM Link | Quote | ID: 43398


Panser
Smooth.
Level: 42

Posts: 164/344
EXP: 505591
Next: 15771

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4989 days
Last view: 4989 days
Well, This is Windows 1.0 and this is Windows 3.0. It definitely looks like the uglier one...wow, look at how awful Windows used to be!

Kernal
Posted on 06-08-07 12:56 AM Link | Quote | ID: 43399

Gone
Level: 88

Posts: 1761/1881
EXP: 6463888
Next: 186776

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6150 days
Last view: 6140 days
That title bar definitely looks like 1.x or 2.x to me.

Windows 286 was really 2.1, and there was also a Windows 386, which was another version of 2.1.

Katelyn
Posted on 06-08-07 12:56 AM Link | Quote | ID: 43401

beh
Level: 86

Posts: 1689/1816
EXP: 6131511
Next: 10596

Since: 02-21-07

Last post: 6149 days
Last view: 6149 days
Beh, KDE looks much cuter than XP's crappy Luna scheme or Vista's resource-hungry Aero scheme

I still use the 9x/2K classic scheme on my Windows XP, although I'm not on it very much anymore, thanks to Kubuntu

Kernal
Posted on 06-08-07 12:57 AM Link | Quote | ID: 43402

Gone
Level: 88

Posts: 1762/1881
EXP: 6463888
Next: 186776

Since: 02-20-07

Last post: 6150 days
Last view: 6140 days
KDE owns. I know a lot of people will disagree, but the X11-based GUIs work a lot better than anything Microsoft will come up with.

xpCynic
Posted on 06-08-07 12:59 AM Link | Quote | ID: 43404


Panser
Smooth.
Level: 42

Posts: 165/344
EXP: 505591
Next: 15771

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4989 days
Last view: 4989 days
Posted by Katelyn
Beh, KDE looks much cuter than XP's crappy Luna scheme or Vista's resource-hungry Aero scheme

But this isn't XP OR Vista, and it's not resource-hungry at all...but it IS crappy, I guess.
Pages: 1 2


Main - Computing - How much would you pay... New thread | New reply

Acmlmboard 2.1+4δ (2023-01-15)
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al.

Page rendered in 0.026 seconds. (322KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 57, rows: 79/80, time: 0.016 seconds.