Points of Required Attention™
Please chime in on a proposed restructuring of the ROM hacking sections.
Views: 88,501,792
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search 04-29-24 05:18 PM
Guest: Register | Login

0 users currently in Computing | 1 guest

Main - Computing - HD Audio Precaution New thread | New reply


GuyPerfect
Posted on 05-30-07 03:55 AM Link | Quote | ID: 39509


Paratroopa
Level: 30

Posts: 49/155
EXP: 152640
Next: 13229

Since: 03-14-07

Last post: 6048 days
Last view: 5997 days
A laptop came in today and I did my usual of immediately scrubbing the hard drive and installing Windows XP Professional (no service packs) and Debian 4.0 on it. All was going smooth until I encountered the audio driver for Windows.

Just a heads up, but any High Definition Audio driver (such as the common Conexant one) that will show up in many newer computers will require the Microsoft Universal Audio Architecture driver installed to be able to detect the hardware. That's something a lot of people will tell you.

Something people WON'T tell you, however, is that said UAA driver requires at least Windows XP Service Pack 1. I'm an avid anti-SP2 cultist, so I'll never put that on a machine, but SP1 is lightweight and actually enhances the operating system.

So in short:
Windows XP Service Pack 1 -> Universal Audio Architecture -> High Definition Audio driver

Ailure
Posted on 05-30-07 12:39 PM Link | Quote | ID: 39563

Hats
Steam Board2 group
Level: 121

Posts: 877/3965
EXP: 19784259
Next: 272437

Since: 02-19-07
From: Sweden, Skåne

Last post: 3304 days
Last view: 2055 days
And what about SP2 is that you don't like? Sticking with older service packs is only asking for problems.

____________________
AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org


Hiryuu
Posted on 05-30-07 09:48 PM Link | Quote | ID: 39614

Done.
Level: 79

Posts: 708/1471
EXP: 4470723
Next: 108744

Since: 02-19-07
From: ???

Last post: 6089 days
Last view: 6082 days
Posted by GuyPerfect
...but SP1 is lightweight and actually enhances the operating system...


I think that was his reason.

Tanks
Posted on 05-30-07 09:54 PM (rev. 2 of 05-30-07 09:56 PM) Link | Quote | ID: 39616


Dry Bones
Level: 55

Posts: 428/627
EXP: 1244088
Next: 70101

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 5523 days
Last view: 5269 days
Sp1 is better?... what are the flaws in Sp2?

____________________




Hiryuu
Posted on 05-30-07 10:11 PM Link | Quote | ID: 39618

Done.
Level: 79

Posts: 709/1471
EXP: 4470723
Next: 108744

Since: 02-19-07
From: ???

Last post: 6089 days
Last view: 6082 days
All I know is that for whatever XP has, Ace has reduced the file system down to double-digit megs (and then some).

GuyPerfect
Posted on 05-30-07 11:06 PM (rev. 2 of 05-30-07 11:11 PM) Link | Quote | ID: 39634


Paratroopa
Level: 30

Posts: 51/155
EXP: 152640
Next: 13229

Since: 03-14-07

Last post: 6048 days
Last view: 5997 days
Where to start...
• Security Center, which disables a lot of functionality by default and then complains when you reenable it.
• Flinging shards of permissions and filters here and there makes it so more Services are enabled while getting less work done.
• Fancy yet less user-friendly wireless setup dialogs.
• Removal of raw socket support. Those can be very useful for very legitimate things, you know.
• Internet Explorer infected with a little bar that won't even let you run little JavaScript things from your own hard drive until you click it.
• Let's forget all about Intel processors with the Prescott core, shall we?

It's true that you can configure the system to make all of those things the way I would like to have them. But that's basically turning off all the new features of the system, so is it really worth downloading 266 megabytes that add up to nothing in the end?

Metal_Man88
Posted on 05-31-07 07:51 PM Link | Quote | ID: 39913


Level: 48

Posts: 227/458
EXP: 776700
Next: 46843

Since: 02-19-07
From: The Void

Last post: 3033 days
Last view: 3033 days
I believe in scrapping modern systems altogether; if I had my way I'd use the interface from Windows 3.11 combined with an easily accessible DOS terminal, combined with 64-bit operating system power and multithreading.

SP2 has its pros. For someone like me, it's easy to disable and destroy anything which offends me (my Security Console has been told to STFU, for example), although since moving to Windows Server 2003 I don't really have any SP2 to worry about.

I just dislike restarting my computer over and over again. It's a waste of time.

Main - Computing - HD Audio Precaution New thread | New reply

Acmlmboard 2.1+4δ (2023-01-15)
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al.

Page rendered in 0.021 seconds. (321KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 47, rows: 62/63, time: 0.015 seconds.