 |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
|
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | ||
| 0 users currently in Femine's Corner. |
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - Femine's Corner - A Furrtastical Philosophical Discussion |
New poll |  |  |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| User | Post | ||
|
Kyoufu Kawa Intends to keep Rom Hacking in one piece until the end                   Since: 11-18-05 From: Catgirl Central Station Last post: 6465 days Last view: 6465 days |
| ||
| Good point. | |||
emcee Red Super Koopa   Since: 11-20-05 Last post: 6465 days Last view: 6465 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Trapster Well, now that the RapeX has been invented, you don't really know for sure about humans either. |
|||
Keitaro Mole Since: 11-18-05 From: Massachusetts Last post: 6623 days Last view: 6623 days |
| ||
I seriously don't get what the big deal about furries is. Really its like...having sex with a girl in a cat costume is only to suppliment having sex with an actual cat? A girl dressed as a cat would only appear sexy if the cat itself is sexy to you. Did that even make sense? Ehn, it sounded a lot better in my head. And besides, the concept of furries is a bit unerving. I honestly don't perfer my women to have more hair on their legs than I do  (edited by Keitaro on 04-17-06 02:53 PM) (edited by Keitaro on 04-17-06 04:48 PM) |
|||
Snow Tomato Snap Dragon  Since: 12-31-05 From: NYC Last post: 6486 days Last view: 6471 days |
| ||
| How would railing a rhino be pleasurable at all? Oh well, that's not the question here. If animals could consent and talk to you.. then I don't think it'd really be an issue. I think if you can converse with it.. and it can understand what you're saying.. and agree to it.. you can do anything you want to it. Well, unless it's like... kill it or hurt it. I mean even if the person or animal you were talking to was a masochist.. it's still not right. Wow the question of beastiality comes up and I'm talking about masochist squirrels already.
I wonder if certain species would have a certain demeanor in like a bar type setting. Like beavers give it up on the first date... or shit like never buy a drink for a goat. I wonder if certain animals would be snobby towards us, or accepting or what. If I were an animal I'd be pretty pissed off right now.. polar bears are falling through the icecaps of the earth because of global warming, we kill like 298347928374293847 chickens, cows, pigs, and etc.. like every day.. like they're just raw materials or something like iron ore or something. If beastiality is so wrong.. because they can't consent... then why isn't like putting a dog to sleep wrong.. or like killing a chicken for food wrong. It's funny we can put a dog to sleep without it's consent... but we can't put a human to sleep even if they consent AND they are in excruciating pain. It's just a strange irony. |
|||
Squash Monster Bouncy Since: 11-18-05 From: Right next to myself. Last post: 6473 days Last view: 6466 days |
| ||
| Kinda strange with the masochist squirrels there, Snowy. Everyone who's ever met a squirrel knows they'd be sadists.
I don't care for furries, but my ladyfriend looks unbearably cute in cat ears. But she looks unbearably cute all the time so that's nothing new. In theory, we put dogs to sleep to spare them a slow and painful death. But yes, we still don't do that for humans. I guess we must just like dogs better. |
|||
Skydude Armos Knight  Since: 02-18-06 From: Stanford, CA Last post: 6738 days Last view: 6738 days |
| ||
| You make some interesting points, Snow, and I feel it's a shame you had to turn that into a politically charged rant.
As for why it would be wrong, it's not about lack of consent, per se, so much as that being a more easily understandable discussion of a sentient vs a non-sentient being. |
|||
|
Snow Tomato Snap Dragon Since: 12-31-05 From: NYC Last post: 6486 days Last view: 6471 days |
| ||
| It's not politically charged. It's a fact. I'm an animal lover, and I love the environment. But when someone starts talking about animal rights or the environment.. they're suddenly a politically charged crazy lunatic with an agenda.
It's nothing on you, it's the way everyone looks at it. Well if they could talk and feel emotions.. are they not a sentient being? |
|||
Silvershield   580  Since: 11-19-05 From: Emerson, New Jersey Last post: 6477 days Last view: 6465 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Snow TomatoThe livestock and poultry raised purely to be consumed as food don't have much in the way of a life, anyway. Chickens are born, raised to minimal age, and slaughtered relatively humanely. Larger animals naturally need a longer time to achieve viable size and weight, but can count on a life of plenty as far as food and basic necessities are concerned. No such animal lives a life of luxury, but man is naturally omnivorous and he has tamed the animal kingdom in such a way that, while not ideal - I suppose ideal would be treating each farm-raised chicken as if it were a millionaire's pet poodle, giving it expensive food and its own private living conditions - ably balances economy with some basic degree of humane care. Like it or not, a human being naturally consumes meat, and the only methods that could produce meat on such a large scale are not methods that many animal rights activists are all that fond of. It's just the way it has to be. |
|||
|
Sin Dogan 860  Uoodo Original Blend Armored Trooper Votoms Canned Coffee! Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6469 days Last view: 6468 days |
| ||
Originally posted by SilvershieldOriginally posted by Snow TomatoThe livestock and poultry raised purely to be consumed as food don't have much in the way of a life, anyway. Chickens are born, raised to minimal age, and slaughtered relatively humanely. Larger animals naturally need a longer time to achieve viable size and weight, but can count on a life of plenty as far as food and basic necessities are concerned. No such animal lives a life of luxury, but man is naturally omnivorous and he has tamed the animal kingdom in such a way that, while not ideal - I suppose ideal would be treating each farm-raised chicken as if it were a millionaire's pet poodle, giving it expensive food and its own private living conditions - ably balances economy with some basic degree of humane care. Hahaha. Humanely? It's ridiculous the way they're treated. Chickens stacked on top of one another in crowded silos clawing each others eyes out. Sows belted down while it feeds its children, among other things. It's completely disgusting. Bottom line: Animals don't deserve to be treated like shit. They're basically prepped to produce the most meat and it's so stupid if you see that this is what's making America fat while others starve. WHO NEEDS THAT MUCH MEAT?! |
|||
|
Ziff B2BB BACKTOBASICSBITCHES Since: 11-18-05 From: A room Last post: 6465 days Last view: 6465 days |
| ||
Originally posted by SilvershieldOriginally posted by Snow TomatoThe livestock and poultry raised purely to be consumed as food don't have much in the way of a life, anyway. Chickens are born, raised to minimal age, and slaughtered relatively humanely. Larger animals naturally need a longer time to achieve viable size and weight, but can count on a life of plenty as far as food and basic necessities are concerned. No such animal lives a life of luxury, but man is naturally omnivorous and he has tamed the animal kingdom in such a way that, while not ideal - I suppose ideal would be treating each farm-raised chicken as if it were a millionaire's pet poodle, giving it expensive food and its own private living conditions - ably balances economy with some basic degree of humane care. I'm not going to lie. It sounds like the life cycle of the common engineer. |
|||
|
Snow Tomato Snap Dragon Since: 12-31-05 From: NYC Last post: 6486 days Last view: 6471 days |
| ||
| I would be fine if they didn't genetically alter chickens to the point of they can't walk. Their legs physically break under the weight of their own enlarged bodies. I mean, aren't we not supposed to fuck with nature.. isn't that like the big issue with coloning and even to some extent, contraception. It's cruel and inhumane. And if they didn't abuse the animals in the factories I'd be fine with it to. If there was a more humane way to kill them.. I'd be cool.
What stirs me though is why we feel we have the power to just go out there and mass murder animals? I know, food chain.. they eat each other to. But we've gotten to the point where we don't really have to rely on them for food anymore.. so that's why I refuse to participate in it. You can eat other things.. and actually be healthier. We've tamed the world to a point where we don't have to rely on animals for food anymore. The only reason now is "because it's yummy". "I suppose ideal would be treating each farm-raised chicken as if it were a millionaire's pet poodle, giving it expensive food and its own private living conditions" No. That would be an economically and environmentally STUPID. Just don't keep them in a like 1 foot wide cage.. and stop injecting them with crazy drugs to make them huge- would be nice. Why does everyone assume that people who believe in animal rights are crazy? I think PETA gives us a bad name. I literally get attacked when I even open my mouth for like two sentances.. and it's not just here. Every time I eat and leave meat off my plate I get this look like I have some sort of uncurable mental disease. |
|||
|
Silvershield 580 Since: 11-19-05 From: Emerson, New Jersey Last post: 6477 days Last view: 6465 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Captain SubtextChill out, brosef. I never said their living conditions are especially humane, just their method of execution. (And, honestly, I feel like "execution" is the best way to describe it.) But the animals in question - chickens, specifically - don't live all that long as it is, so it's not a priority. I'm not saying I'm all for current conventions in raising livestock, but the price of meat would shoot up ten times if conditions were improved to the point most people would consider acceptable. That doesn't constitute my approval of how things are, just an acknowledgement that that's how it has to be. Originally posted by Snow TomatoWhat do you suggest? Edit to respond to Snow Tomato, who posted as I was writing. (edited by Silvershield on 04-19-06 02:08 AM) |
|||
|
Ziff B2BB BACKTOBASICSBITCHES Since: 11-18-05 From: A room Last post: 6465 days Last view: 6465 days |
| ||
| Heard of agriculture?
I hear its an old trend that's just coming back now. Really in the vogue, all the Latin American countries are doing it  |
|||
|
Sin Dogan 860 Uoodo Original Blend Armored Trooper Votoms Canned Coffee! Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6469 days Last view: 6468 days |
| ||
 Brosef? So you're basically saying you too don't agree with their living conditions but we can't do anything 'bout it? Way to be weak. You pathetic waste.  |
|||
|
Silvershield 580 Since: 11-19-05 From: Emerson, New Jersey Last post: 6477 days Last view: 6465 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Plus Sign AbominationDon't patronize me!!!11 You can't expect humans as a species to suddenly become entirely herbivorous. It's neither practical nor natural nor really even a good idea. I know that I, for one, am not about to give up meat, despite the state of the industry currently. And most people are on the same page as I am. Originally posted by Captain SubtextYeah, I know somebody at school that says "brosef," and I knew that you, of all people, would find it hilarious... I'm not saying we can't do anything about it, but I am saying that it's not practical to do anything about it. Economically, any sort of revolutionary change cannot be made without spoiling the entire state of affairs. To call meat a staple of the American diet would be an understatement, and increasing its price to the point that would be required if animals' conditions were improved is purely and simply not practical. That word keeps coming up but, plainly, it is just an issue of practicality. Edit for the same reason as above, responding to a post that came as I was writing. (edited by Silvershield on 04-19-06 02:21 AM) |
|||
|
Snow Tomato Snap Dragon Since: 12-31-05 From: NYC Last post: 6486 days Last view: 6471 days |
| ||
| I'm suggesting that it's not as necessary as people think it is. Especially when you live in America (or some other 1st world country) with dozens of other options replacing meat. But everyone thinks meat is like water.. you simply need to have it, and you don't.
However lots of other countries don't have options. I'm talking like places where people are starving to death because we're consuming all the food.. and we can afford to share. I've always thought this... but it doesn't seem like it's going to change.. ever. I'm just questioning the necessity of it. And the need for it to be so available to us.. it's ridiculous the amount of meat there is. Its absurd how much meat we consume.. how much food in general we consume is absurd. This has more to do with the concept of enough. I don't think Americans understand the concept of having enough. But I choose not to eat meat because I recognize that I have enough without it. I don't need to contribute money to something I find morally objectionable.. especially if I have a choice. |
|||
|
Sin Dogan 860 Uoodo Original Blend Armored Trooper Votoms Canned Coffee! Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6469 days Last view: 6468 days |
| ||
| Yea, so get it from a butcher. |
|||
|
Silvershield 580 Since: 11-19-05 From: Emerson, New Jersey Last post: 6477 days Last view: 6465 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Snow TomatoIt's not "necessary" as a dietary stable in the sense that there are all sorts of new-age alternatives, but I'd rather get my protein from a juicy steak rather than a peanut butter sandwich or a hunk of tofu. Sure, it's petty. Sure, it's an issue of taste. But I'm not going to bend over backwards to make some sort of political statement or to save a farm-raised animal's life, an animal that doesn't have much of a life in the first place. If that offends anyone's beliefs, I'm sorry, but vegetarianism is not a value that I hold and, frankly, not a value that I believe to be valid (except when it's a result of health concerns or similar issues instead of simply "I think animals are cute and cuddly, so I don't eat them"). |
|||
|
Sin Dogan 860 Uoodo Original Blend Armored Trooper Votoms Canned Coffee! Since: 11-17-05 Last post: 6469 days Last view: 6468 days |
| ||
| I think you're making it seem like there are two extremes. I mean, obviously, nobody eats meat all the time.(haha thats so gross thinking about it) But eating less meat doesn't mean you have to be the new age alternative vegetarian. All it means is eating less meat. And as Snow proposed, giving what we can do without to others. Certainly THAT's not improbable, old chum. | |||
|
Snow Tomato Snap Dragon Since: 12-31-05 From: NYC Last post: 6486 days Last view: 6471 days |
| ||
| So it is "because it's yummy".
It's just an example as to how far an individual will go towards a change. Nothing is ever going to change if people just say "well, it's not my weight to carry". This is more of an issue in the oil thing though. It's obviously killing the environment, there's polar bears falling through the ice caps cause of global warming. And there's extreme weather conditions because of it... but no one's ever gonna do anything because it's "not their fault".. it's out of their control. And that's why there's war and the oil thing happening. With animal rights it's definatly different... because yeah, people obviously need to eat. I can see why people eat meat. But there's alternative forms of energy that we aren't using because america's oil addiction is out of every single individual's hands.. it's part of something bigger.. the economy and the world runs on oil. You've got me on a tangent here. [= |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread |
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - Femine's Corner - A Furrtastical Philosophical Discussion |
| |
