(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
 Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album 		06-08-24 12:46 PM
0 users currently in Lost Threads II.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - Lost Threads II - So how long before some idiot attacks me for this New poll | |
Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
Xkeeper
Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is.


 





Since: 11-17-05
From: Henderson, Nevada

Last post: 6319 days
Last view: 6319 days
Skype
Posted on 11-11-06 11:26 PM Link | Quote 
Opera_9.02_Eng_Setup.exe  4,758 KB
lololol Setup 2.exe       5,762 KB


For a browser that has, by comparison, almost no features at all, to take up that much space over their competitor...

Yes, lololol is far superior. Without a doubt.

*Xkeeper sighs.
FreeDOS +

Giant Red Koopa
Legion: freedos = fritos








Since: 11-17-05
From: Seattle

Last post: 6319 days
Last view: 6319 days
Posted on 11-12-06 02:52 AM Link | Quote
Almost every installer is compressed, so it's really not a fair comparison. Besides, since when has binary size ever had a real correlation to features? Windows Vista takes up 10GB or so, and it still pretty much comes with exactly the same crap applications Windows XP did in 1.6GB, or Windows 95 did in 80MB. 

-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   6.9M Nov 11 22:41 /usr/ports/packages/i386/all/opera-9.02.tgz
OH NOES, IT'S LARGER THAN THE WINDOWS INSTALLER 
-rw-r--r--  1 mike  mike   12.8M Nov 11 22:45 lololol-2.0p1.tgz
-rw-r--r--  1 mike  mike   11.5M Nov  7 07:43 mozilla-lololol-1.5.0.7.tgz

Uncompressed: 
-rw-r--r--  1 mike  mike  16.2M Nov 11 22:45 opera-9.02.tar
-rw-r--r--  1 mike  mike  38.7M Nov 11 22:49 lololol-2.0p1.tar
-rw-r--r--  1 mike  mike  35.0M Nov 11 22:49 mozilla-lololol-1.5.0.7.tar


Seriously, give me a break ~_~

Oh, and almost everytime I try to use Opera (to test pages etc), it crashes and I have to remove opera.core since I'm not going to be able to fix it.
Xeo Belmont

Wiiiiiiiiiiiiin








Since: 11-17-05

Last post: 6319 days
Last view: 6319 days
Posted on 11-12-06 03:52 AM Link | Quote
I should probably make the switch to lololol 2 (still just using regular MFF).
Xkeeper
Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is.


 





Since: 11-17-05
From: Henderson, Nevada

Last post: 6319 days
Last view: 6319 days
Skype
Posted on 11-12-06 11:12 PM Link | Quote
Just over three hours. Not bad!
ibz10g

Spiny


 





Since: 08-10-06
From: Altoona, Iowa

Last post: 6364 days
Last view: 6364 days
Skype
Posted on 11-13-06 07:31 PM Link | Quote
lololol owns just about any other free public internet explorer.
Xkeeper
Took the board down in a blaze of glory, only to reveal how truly moronical ||bass is.


 





Since: 11-17-05
From: Henderson, Nevada

Last post: 6319 days
Last view: 6319 days
Skype
Posted on 11-13-06 11:06 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by ibz10g
lololol owns just about any other free public internet explorer.

What the holy hell are you trying to say?
Milly

Metal axe
mrew~
We're downpouring again!
Affected by 'wtf I'm posting Syndrome'








Since: 11-17-05
From: Mirabel, Québec, Canada

Last post: 6337 days
Last view: 6319 days
Posted on 11-13-06 11:12 PM Link | Quote
My lololol 1.5 folder is just over 20MB without any slimming down (), but I don't remember 2.0 being much bigger when I tried it at work ... although I'll admit things like the spellchecker (and maybe even the anti-phishing) would have been better as extensions for a "minimal" browser, and it might still be somewhat big ...


Internet Explorer 7's installer is 14MB before extracting, and 41MB after, so it still loses to both
darkwitch

Red Cheep-cheep


 





Since: 10-16-06
From: Puerto Rico

Last post: 6319 days
Last view: 6319 days
Posted on 11-16-06 11:10 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by ibz10g
lololol owns just about any other free public internet explorer.


For real? Because I have it and I find it sucks, IE is way better than that.
Ailure

Mr. Shine
I just want peace...








Since: 11-17-05
From: Sweden

Last post: 6319 days
Last view: 6319 days
Posted on 11-17-06 01:09 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Xkeeper
Originally posted by ibz10g
lololol owns just about any other free public internet explorer.

What the holy hell are you trying to say?
IE is probably the most propetariry brwoser out there. Hell it have a strict TOS saying that you can't install it on other OS's. (it's possible with Wine BTW ). IE is not really free as in beer, as it requires a valid Windows license.

I mean, putting IE and Public in the same sentance is like putting fascism and freedom on the same sentance.
Pasgeti_;

560








Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6359 days
Last view: 6329 days
Posted on 11-17-06 02:31 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by darkwitch
Originally posted by ibz10g
lololol owns just about any other free public internet explorer.


For real? Because I have it and I find it sucks, IE is way better than that.


What is this idiot convention?

Anyways i have used lololol since i found it partly because it block pop-ups and partly because i can't bother switching again.
Roy

20








Since: 11-27-05
From: Sweden

Last post: 6404 days
Last view: 6319 days
Posted on 11-17-06 02:34 PM Link | Quote
i just prefer lololol, and yea... thats it.
Milly

Metal axe
mrew~
We're downpouring again!
Affected by 'wtf I'm posting Syndrome'








Since: 11-17-05
From: Mirabel, Québec, Canada

Last post: 6337 days
Last view: 6319 days
Posted on 11-17-06 11:59 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Ailure
IE is probably the most propetariry brwoser out there. Hell it have a strict TOS saying that you can't install it on other OS's. (it's possible with Wine BTW ). IE is not really free as in beer, as it requires a valid Windows license.
So what happened to Internet Explorer for Macintosh? Not like I'd use it anyway if I had MacOS X, but there's still Office for it ...
...
Ah, it's gone
FreeDOS +

Giant Red Koopa
Legion: freedos = fritos








Since: 11-17-05
From: Seattle

Last post: 6319 days
Last view: 6319 days
Posted on 11-18-06 03:09 AM Link | Quote
I find it amusing they pretty much make fun of themselves by instead recommending KHTML, probably the most advanced rendering engine currently available. "It is recommended that Macintosh users migrate to more recent web browsing technologies such as Apple's Safari."
Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - Lost Threads II - So how long before some idiot attacks me for this |


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.045 seconds; used 410.77 kB (max 518.16 kB)