(Link to AcmlmWiki) Offline: thank ||bass
Register | Login
Views: 13,040,846
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album
06-03-24 01:35 AM
0 users currently in General Chat.
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Chat - Ecological Footprint New poll | |
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
What did you get?
(pick one you loser)
0.1-5
 
20.0%, 6 votes
5.1-10
 
16.7%, 5 votes
10.1-15
 
30.0%, 9 votes
15.1-20
 
13.3%, 4 votes
20.1+
 
20.0%, 6 votes
Multi-voting is disabled. 30 users have voted.

User Post
Ninetales
banned by request


 





Since: 11-17-05
From: Gone.

Last post: 6314 days
Last view: 6314 days
Skype
Posted on 09-07-06 09:55 PM Link | Quote
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 5.4
MOBILITY 0.7
SHELTER 2.5
GOODS/SERVICES 3
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 12

IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.6 PLANETS.
Cara Zeltina

90


 





Since: 05-11-06

Last post: 6389 days
Last view: 6389 days
Posted on 09-07-06 10:13 PM Link | Quote
I don't buy this test at all. I rated with 0 Mobility (which is true, since I never leave the house, really..) but somehow, still ended up with a footprint of about 16 or so.. If everyone lived like me it said, we'd need 4.3 (or whatever) planets.. right.. If no one drove and lived in a small town (<1000) like me, I'm really sure that'd require four planets, right, absolutely..

There is so much bull in this test it is absurd. I hardly do anything to suck up the worlds resources other than the electric I use, which I tend to put to some good use at least, so it isn't wasted.. Seemed the fact I said I eat meat and such made the results skyrocket, which leads me to believe the test is either very biased, or there is some secret animal shortage I don't know about..
HyperHacker

Star Mario
Finally being paid to code in VB! If only I still enjoyed that. <_<
Wii #7182 6487 4198 1828


 





Since: 11-18-05
From: Canada, w00t!
My computer's specs, if anyone gives a damn.
STOP TRUNCATING THIS >8^(

Last post: 6314 days
Last view: 6314 days
Posted on 09-07-06 10:21 PM Link | Quote
Well it does take a lot of resources to raise, process, package and ship all that meat.

We need to just move to Jupiter. That's gotta be more than 18 times Earth's size.
NSNick

Gohma
IF ALL ELSE
FAILS USE FIRE
BOOZE








Since: 11-17-05
From:

Last post: 6316 days
Last view: 6316 days
Skype
Posted on 09-07-06 10:23 PM Link | Quote
FOOD 5.9
MOBILITY 1
SHELTER 6.9
GOODS/SERVICES 7.2
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 21

IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.7 PLANETS.




Take that, planet!
Alastor
Fearless Moderator Hero








Since: 11-17-05
From: An apartment by DigiPen, Redmond, Washington

Last post: 6314 days
Last view: 6314 days
Posted on 09-08-06 12:12 AM Link | Quote
I was pretty annoyed at the lack of eat meat but don't have dairy, too.

I checked, the highest you can go is like 112 acres.


(edited by Alastor the Stylish on 09-07-06 11:12 PM)
182077607309.34 +

Red Cheep-cheep








Since: 11-22-05
From: Atlantis.
All your base are belong to us.

Last post: 6346 days
Last view: 6339 days
Posted on 09-08-06 01:20 AM Link | Quote
CATEGORYACRES
FOOD6.9
MOBILITY1.2
SHELTER5.7
GOODS/SERVICES6.2
TOTAL FOOTPRINT20


IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.


IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.5 PLANETS.

I tried getting the lowest footprint I could, and it actually said “IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.0 PLANETS,” but my footprint was four, and some people’s were less, but still was more than one planet.
Randy53215

Melon Bug


 





Since: 11-17-05
From: Greenfield, Wisconsin (U.S.A)

Last post: 6314 days
Last view: 6314 days
Skype
Posted on 09-08-06 04:44 AM Link | Quote
It said if people lived like me we would need 6.2 earths. >8(

CATEGORY ACRES

FOOD 6.2

MOBILITY 2.2

SHELTER 8.9

GOODS/SERVICES 10.1

TOTAL FOOTPRINT 27
LizardKing

Bullet Bill








Since: 11-18-05

Last post: 6317 days
Last view: 6314 days
Posted on 09-08-06 09:45 AM Link | Quote
CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 1.7
MOBILITY 0.1
SHELTER 0.6
GOODS/SERVICES 0.8
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 3.2



IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 7.9 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.8 PLANETS.

Wow, that's not so bad, atleast not compared to some of you guys. The result I got was definetaly better than what I had expected. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
Gywall

Coney








Since: 11-20-05
From: England!

Last post: 6316 days
Last view: 6314 days
Posted on 09-09-06 08:40 AM Link | Quote
CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 1.2
MOBILITY 0.1
SHELTER 0.3
GOODS/SERVICES 0.2
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 1.8

IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 5.3 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.0 PLANETS.


Haha.. It's amazing what little money does. XD
That's honest, Seriously.
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - General Chat - Ecological Footprint |


ABII

Acmlmboard 1.92.999, 9/17/2006
©2000-2006 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper

Page rendered in 0.051 seconds; used 405.54 kB (max 506.38 kB)