Originally posted by Geiger

---

Rendering Chrono Trigger maps is much more complex than Super Mario World. FuSoYa started a Chrono Trigger editor named Lunar Trigger which was never finished, though it could edit Location maps. Last time I checked, TF's managed code ran just slightly slower than LT's native code (5 seconds for large maps). Version 1.06 renders a 3 megapixel image on the fly in software. The WIP version renders a 12 megapixel image in about the same amount of time.

...

---T.Geiger

---

Originally posted by JCE3000GT

---

My response:
See Parasyte this is EXACTLY what I'm talking about. You are picking apart other people's work just to nitpitck. This kind of post is exactly what I was talking about, you people that do this do NOTHING for the betterment of the emulation community. Peer, I frankly find nothihng wrong with your choice of .NET. I still think you've done a fantastic job.

---

Originally posted by JCE3000GT

---

30ms vs 3 seconds? You calculated the 30ms yourself didn't you.

---

Originally posted by JCE3000GT

---

You must be one of those people Parasyte that speeds around on the freeway trying to get 1 car ahead don't you?

---

Originally posted by JCE3000GT

---

So it's, 3 seconds...so what. Unless he's planning on releasing this under a company name to the retail/distributor marker why does he really need to care how long it takes to do something--and even then it's still his prerogative what he codes. Especially if it works.

---

Originally posted by JCE3000GT

---

So, if you really don't like .NET and you feel his program is too slow just code your own CT editor using what ever means deem you fit...oh wait you don't even like nor play CT. Then WHY are you even in this thread? You don't even contribute anything worthwhile to the advancement of CT editing. I was hoping Peer had some new info in this thread...then I see your ambiguously stupid post. You don't like my interface, you don't like Peer's extra 3 seconds (supposedly 3 seconds)...what's next. This is really getting old.

---

Originally posted by JCE3000GT

---

Maybe Peer should of never released his editor and I never released mine, and everyone else never released thier work...where would that of taken us? We would still be hex editing NES ROM is where we would of been. I'm out.

---

Originally posted by DivineDragoonKain

---

30 ms may be 100 times faster than 3 seconds, but to the human comprehension (disregarding actual time), there is but a minor and SLIGHT difference (unless you're doing nothing but rendering maps or have some sort of hyperactive disorder, which I myself do, so that's not even an excuse). That's nothing but nitpicking.

---

Originally posted by DivineDragoonKain

---

However, I do agree about the GUI... to an extent. JCE should not be forced to take anything into consideration, but rather, someone who feels that this is a major problem should create their own version 1.1 that incorporates lower resolution support (with his permission). You say you've been programming for the better part of a decade, so why not help him with his problem? Even if you'll have no use for the editor, you'd be helping the CT hacking community in general, and would lessen the dark light you've been put into through this argument.

---

.text:004012FA        lea     ecx, [ebp+var_58]
.text:004012FD        mov     edx, offset aExampleOfAssig ; "Example of 'assigning' a string to an a"...
.text:00401302        mov     eax, 49h
.text:00401307        mov     [esp+78h+var_70], eax
.text:0040130B        mov     [esp+78h+var_74], edx
.text:0040130F        mov     [esp+78h+var_78], ecx
.text:00401312        call    memcpy
.text:00401317        lea     eax, [ebp+var_58]
.text:0040131A        mov     [esp+78h+var_74], eax
.text:0040131E        mov     [esp+78h+var_78], offset aS ; "%s"
.text:00401325        call    printf

Originally posted by HyperHacker

---

I was doing it like this:
const char* stringarray[3];
stringarray[0] = "String 1";
stringarray[1] = "String 2";
[...]

I still don't see why that couldn't work, since they're constant strings; it should just be making stringarray[0] point to the first one and stringarray[1] point to the second?

---

Originally posted by HyperHacker

---

...And *surprise!* it doesn't work. I really don't see why this has to be so complicated.

int unit = 0;
const char* Name[10] = {
"Bytes",
"Kilobytes",
"Megabytes",
"Gigabytes",
"Terabytes",
"B",
"KB",
"MB",
"GB",
"TB"
};
while((b >= 1024) && (unit <= 4))
{
b = b /1024;
unit++;
}
if(!FullNames) unit += 5;
sprintf(Buffer,"%d %d %s",b,unit,Name[unit]);

It still just prints null for the first one and crashes with any others.

---

Originally posted by HyperHacker

---

The %lld thing isn't working either:

long long x = 5000000000LL;
printf("%lld\n",x);

I still only get 705032704 (0x2A05F200) rather than 5000000000 (0x12A05F200) (whether x is signed or not).

---