Register | Login | |||||
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| ACS
| Commons
| Calendar
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat |
| |
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - - Posts by Jesper |
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 |
User | Post | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 944/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
And he told you. "READ THIS" was a link. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 945/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
So, here's what today's home computer looks like. If it's not, you're doing it all wrong. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 946/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Your daily dose of sw3de: http://wootest.net/scrsh/itunes-acmlmboard-20040927.png Abnormal, try hitting Ctrl+B ("Browse") in the Library and just pick an artist and an album instead of those playlists. We're not Winamp, remember? (edited by Jesper on 09-27-04 03:23 PM) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 947/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Originally posted by Legionhttp://wootest.net/scrsh/itunes-acmlmboard-20040927-2.pngOriginally posted by Jesper Apologies/thanks to Cymoro. (Bottom left, people.) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 948/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Originally posted by Kitten YifferEdited out in Paint Shop Pro. Hell, if I left any shrooms in, Yiffy Kitten might want them banned. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 949/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Someone liked NeXT. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 950/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Myriad. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 951/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
What Jizuko said. There's a super hyper efficient way to be able to read his posts if his host is down, and that is to turn off layouts. If his layout was bad enough to qualify a warning, you may remove it and warn him, but it's perfectly legible. Unless it breaks one of the rules of the board very, very, very badly, you should not be able to be banned because of your layout. Same goes for one's bio, one's title or, why the hell not, one's posts. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 952/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Originally posted by Yiffy Kitten1) Fair point.Originally posted by Leland Gaunt1) As I said, MAKE IT READABLE when the server is down, to resolve said problem. As it is, his is the ONLY one that is NOT LEGIBLE when the CSS host is down. 2) If you're going to ban people based on grammar in addition to previous offenses, you'll have a backlog lasting you until February before you get to Sion. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 953/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
It should be noted that the inclusion of these arrays are not in any way new. PHP before 4.1 had $HTTP_POST_VARS, etc. They just renamed them so a) they'd be shorter and more convenient to type and b) to draw attention to not writing code that can be exploited, like the ipbanned example above. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 955/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The SomerZ used to use "Breaking the laws of sanity since 1985!" as his /quit tagline on IRC. He stopped using that when I changed mine to "Breaking the laws of sanitation since 1985!" | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 956/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Originally posted by CymoroWant to talk to me about reasons? Good. HTML was created for this reason: to provide a pretty low-beat easy-to-write document format with hyperlinks. It was going to be used more or less for scientific reports. There's your reason. The font tag was not in there originally. Why? Because it would not be useful in writing a scientific report. Lists are. Blockquotes are. Emphasised text is. Yes, you're all saying "but this isn't a fucking scientific report, this is a message board". And you're right. My point is that changing the text color mid-text is not something that's done at all in publications. Like it or not, your post is more of a publication than a font tag fun-house. If you change the text color in the middle of the post for no appearent reason, you're a dolt. The only reason for using font tags that makes sense is that you'll want to set your layout. It's all about layout. You'll want your post to appear in green on black? All fine and dandy. Can be done with font tags as well as stylesheets. The stylesheets, however, have an upside to this. Since HTML 4, which is about five or six years behind, HTML is not the recommended way in which to specify things such as the preferred color. This was not done to piss off the rest of the internet. This was done so it could be outsourced to stylesheets. And when it's outsourced to stylesheets, if you don't like the look of something (look kids, it's our old friend lime on pink!) you either disable the stylesheets or define a user stylesheet for your browser. You can't do that with font tags, which, again, are obsolete. The reason we use it on this board is, frankly, because the code is written to use obsolete HTML. I'm going to migrate the board into skipping things like font tags completely, and those of you using Netscape 2 can go upgrade. The problems some of you are having with the layouts are that you're mixing old stuff, like font tags, and stylesheets. They don't blend well together. Or you set a background directly in the code - such as when using the Post background code - and the font color using an external stylesheet. The downside is that if the external stylesheet goes down, and the scheme color clashes with your background, which is still loaded, you're in deep shit. For this reason, the background should be set in your external stylesheet too. This isn't an inherent problem of font tags, or table tags, or even stylesheets. Both ways work spectacularly well. It's when you mix those ways, or use stylesheets from different sources (inline vs external) and one of those sources falls flat, that it all fails. (edited by Jesper on 10-01-04 06:03 AM) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 957/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Originally posted by witeasprinwowOriginally posted by Jesper |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 958/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
In bed, via laptop. Next question. Edit: Originally posted by Leland GauntBox Car, Jizuko. Box Car. (edited by Jesper on 10-05-04 12:38 PM) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(restricted)
Jesper |
Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 960/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days
|
The Forum in Which Jackasses Throw Metaphorical (And Real) Pies on Eachother's Faces. |
Jesper |
Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 961/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days
|
Okay, okay, calm down. |
Ryan, stop claiming people are flaming you. "OMG YOUR LEVELS SUX" is an example of flaming. "Your first level was nice but had a bit too few enemies for my taste." is an example of an opinion. "Your first level had only five enemies, but took three minutes to play through. I think you need to add more enemies" is an example of constructive critisism. Don't call constructive critisism flaming. It's not. These people are not out to hurt you. When they critisise some parts of your hack, do they DEMAND that you fix it? No. Do they think that everything about your hack sucks just because they had some opinions about two or three things? No. You say that "[we're] just to[o] fucking demanding". No, we're not. All we're doing is saying it's a good hack, but that we think a few details here and there could be made different. That's not demanding. You see a bunch of opinions here and you think that we all hate you because not everyone said "Good hack!" and didn't post a list of critisism. People that just say "Good hack!" are not out to help you out with a few suggestions. We are. Noone's demanding you follow them though. The easiest way to NOT get people's "demanding" critisism is to not post about your hack here. The treatment you just recieved - forum members chiming in with their opinions on your hack - is perfectly standard. Look around in other hack release threads. Noone with their head on straight would suggest that you should be able to do everything right in your first hack. Someone said that it theoretically should be done, yes, but it's foolish to hope for someone's first hack to be the best thing since sliced bread. And so we don't. Most of us don't, anyway. Same with the whole "I'm not getting paid" deal. None of us are getting paid. That's why we help eachother out. It goes without saying. Last point. If you regard this the "minor league" or SMW hacking, where do you regard the "major league" is? This forum is the official forum for the editor every SMW hack is made in. The people you called hacking Gods, the people who made the hacks you love are generally speaking all hanging around here. (A few of them might not.) Without tooting the forum's horn here, I think we can safely deduce that this is as major as it's going to get.
Jesper |
Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 962/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days
|
Originally posted by GarmichaelAnd I am allowed to say that your spelling sucks.
Jesper |
Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 963/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days
|
Not necessarily. A good hack could also be moderately different but at the same level throughout the entire hack. |
Jesper |
Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 964/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days
|
Originally posted by GavinI realize I've fallen behind terribly on this list. But I also see a valid point in what gavin says. If you will, the semantic purity is somewhat muddled. So, I think I'm going to setup a little web-based thingamajig that will allow users to add themselves, and devise some sort of way to show that here instead. If you think I will forget this later on, just send me a PM reminding me. |
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 |
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - - Posts by Jesper |