Register | Login | |||||
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| ACS
| Commons
| Calendar
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat |
| |
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - - Posts by Jesper |
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 |
User | Post | |||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 628/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
Originally posted by Kitten YifferEspecially because there's a link from Edit Profile pointing to Edit Layout. It could look better, but when I added that in we were 10 minutes from uploading.Originally posted by JesperNow I strangle you for changing the menu at top, i'm going to click on the wrong link for awhile now. Confirmed changes in Edit Layout happening in the next build:
By the way, I want to take the opportunity to explain what we're doing with the new stuff. A red thread goes through everything I do atleast to look if we're doing any unnecessary form sending. When creating a new poll, you'll have to re-send the form to add poll options. It's comparatively easy to add javascript code to make that part 'dynamic' - working with code from the page instead of needing to fetch new data every time we want a new poll option. Here's a proof-of-concept of dynamic poll option adding. It will not look like that on the board, but it will very much function like that. Similarly, on the new Edit Layout page, if your browser can handle it, we have a piece of Javascript in place to fetch JUST the new preview data instead of constantly needing to press Preview and fetch around thrice or even four times the data. |
||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 629/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
Originally posted by DischHere's the full HTML of my layout: < |
||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 630/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 631/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
Originally posted by XXXKittenSo right now I guess you're stuck using good old-fashioned telepathy. Sucks. |
||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 632/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
Originally posted by Commandant UmatislavikConfirmed. And sort of fixed. Mac IE will, like Win IE, drop into non-javascript mode now but it will refuse to load the stylesheets even then. Will be fixed hopefully. |
||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 633/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
Originally posted by hukkaWHAT? Read my name again. Originally posted by hukkaI've experienced the keyboard issues, too, on this computer. And the 'druggy mouse' behavior on my last one. But all those series of issues are not consistent from computer to computer, so it seems to me more like an error in Windows NT/XP' implementation of the DOS shell than MI3, which ofcourse doesn't negate the fact that in the end, those issues appear in MI3. It sounds like you have your work cut out for you, but it's good that you have MI3 to refer to and also add features independently of what it or other editors have. I can't wait to see a beta. |
||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 634/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
Originally posted by Kitten YifferYes, the support was dropped, or so I thought. I can reliably detect an IE-only limitation but it's not present on the Mac and so I have to go by other limitations. |
||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 635/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
All admin-only scripts now in admin/. Sorry we didn't put this in 72pt in the version history, but it is there.Originally posted by CervantesIn a word, yes. (edited by Jesper on 08-20-04 01:50 PM) |
||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 636/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 637/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
Originally posted by Millenium NekoOriginally posted by Kitten Yiffer |
||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 638/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
Originally posted by Kitten YifferI've been following the ACS more or less since it started, and I think you need to read up on detecting smug sarcasm. |
||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 639/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
As in zipped up with documents and installation/migration scripts? Possibly, but not within the next six months. Next nine months or year, perhaps. | ||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 640/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
Originally posted by YiffKittenHey, no flaming. Yeah, I know. |
||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 641/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
Originally posted by Kitten YifferHey, you're the one who burst into flames. |
||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 642/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
AE theme spin! Yay! | ||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 643/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
Originally posted by CymorovikovAh yes. When war was beginning.Originally posted by Jesper It's entirely possible that we'll do it the way Erk says for the brave and/or smart ones. We could mark up Acmlm's-specific code. Something like this: /** @acmlm */ foo(bar); /** @/acmlm */ And then we'd just run the scripts through a 'makedist' script and it'd make copies of the scripts, remove the Acmlm's-specific code and package it somehow. We could even do some documentation to bundle in with similar tags. (And for those of you familiar, yes, I snagged the syntax from JavaDoc.) It should be noted that I still want to do a 'sharp' release when this is all done though. Migration scripts, installation instructions, and a simple reference to a few of the key db tables. If anyone's up for writing docs, that'd be great. |
||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 644/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
I'm going to be away for a big part of tomorrow. Waking up at seven AM (you mean those hours before 11AM exist?) I'll be helping my sister move to downtown Stockholm for most of the day. I should be home by the afternoon to put in a solid evening of spam. | ||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 645/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
I have 10 words: (Xk, yours wasn't half bad either. ) |
||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 646/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
XD That was a laugh. Poor Mario . |
||||
Jesper Busy, busy, busy. Level: 69 Posts: 647/2390 EXP: 2856000 For next: 13743 Since: 03-15-04 From: Sweden. Since last post: 176 days Last activity: 79 days |
| |||
Originally posted by AghBobGood, then it's a decent language. Originally posted by AghBobYou're the one who started with the crap-giving here. You haven't shown any proof that CF programming pays much higher than PHP, which was basically what you were saying just a few posts back, so I'd rather tell YOU to stop giving me crap about programming skills. Note that I haven't said anywhere in the thread that "CF is for weiners" or something to a similar effect. I respect other people knowing different languages. Claiming that CF's far ahead of everything else just because it can do stuff like connecting to a DB server in fewer commands than language X, and additionally claiming that you get better paid for it without ANY facts to back it up, however, is just something else. That's both insulting to my programming skills and my languages of choice and also pretty surely not true. I would have believed you if you had said that Assembler programmers earn more, because that's several levels lower and is decidedly harder to learn, but this sounds far more unlikely. The big deal here is that you should always be able to back up what you say. What's been going on in this thread is that people have asked you to define (with tangible examples) why CF is, in your book, a wiser choice than the alternatives. You've been pointing to sites that as far as I could find didn't even mention any actual in-use CF code, they just mentioned that they were using CF. You have further claimed that CF will make people pay you more, but have refused to explain why, how much, what you're refering to that they'll pay you more than (plain HTML pages? That goes without saying). And lastly, you said, verbatim "php is great, but CF is better." and you have still to back that up as well. Proving one language is better than the other is insanely hard, because in order to prove that, one of the languages needs to be wildly inferior to the other or have serious limitations. I don't see this as being the case for CF vs PHP. Before you reply to this post and call me a flaming moron or PHP nazi or CF hater or what have you, BACK UP THE FACTS THAT HAVEN'T BEEN SATISFACTORILY BACKED UP, like those above. |
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 |
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - - Posts by Jesper |