Originally posted by Emptyeye

---

CDummy a; //Makes a a valid class parameter, increments (See above) (1)

---

---

CDummy b[5]; //Makes b a valid class parameter, increments again (See above) (2)

---

---

CDummy * c = new CDummy; //?? Seems to create a new instance of the class with a pointer c

---

---

delete c; //Deletes the above created instance; presumably decrements the n as well

---

---

So where I need help with is getting in my head how what is output equals 7 and 6, respectively. Once I get that, I should be okay.

Thanks!

---

Originally posted by Emptyeye

---

Okay, I get it now. Thanks.

I read the b[5] line as "assigns 5 to the b parameter" or "makes parameter b an array 5 characters long" as opposed to "initializes and increments 5 times". The way the two of you explained it makes sense now.

---

Originally posted by neotransotaku

---

does your video card support those modes? if your video card doesn't support that mode, then there is no way for windows to display those modes without overriding it. after all, your monitor depends on your video card to see how to display stuff

---

Originally posted by HyperHacker

---

Does Windows know that? It might still be using generic drivers.

---

Originally posted by Disch

---

Best of luck to ya on this one =).

---

Originally posted by Disch

---

If you go with WSC FF1 graphics... I can tell you first hand it's a serious pain in the arse (at least map graphics are). It took me forever to get the WSC town graphics ripped... and arranging them on the map was horrible, too. WSC FF1 uses like 9 or more different grass tiles in the town and alternates them on the map (so it doesn't look as tiley). Made the map harder to compress too... simple RLE didn't do the trick very well.

---

---

Personally.. I'd like original graphics more than ripped ones... but getting good original graphics is hard.

---

Originally posted by neotransotaku

---

Originally posted by NightHawk

---

Up to 2048x1536@85Hz, if I remember correctly.

---

what about the modes less than that? you know, the scale isn't continuous to use a reference from math. there are gaps in resolution support. However, that probably isn't the case so maybe you don't have the latest drivers?

---

Originally posted by Colleen

---

25,000 pounds too.

...Doesn't sound like much until you realize the pot started at 1,000 and went up each time the horse won. So it's a nice little payday.

---

Originally posted by Yarx

---

The video card drivers are only half of the pie, you need both the video card AND monitor drivers installed to see all possible resolutions/refresh rates. They are not required for windows to work but they are required if you want windows to function in a way that is specific to your monitor, like listing the correct refresh rates. Don't just use the defaulkt drivers on the floopy. Check on the net for recent driver updates for the monitor. If both video card and monitor drivers are up to date, you may just have to do it manually, as you have been doing before.

---

Originally posted by neotransotaku

---

its been discontinued? was this discontineud before winXP came out? if so, then you are stuck with this since it seems that your drivers do not use WinXP in the correct way or WinXP is getting bad data from your monitor drivers and think it can't allow the monitor to get to 75 or 85Hz.

---