Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
0 user currently in Sports Center.
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Sports Center - MLB implements new steroid policy | |
Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Will this new policy work? (see below for details)
Yes
 
20.0%, 1 vote
No   0.0%, 0 vote
Not strong enough yet
 
80.0%, 4 votes
Multi-voting is disabled.

User Post
Lenophis

Super Koopa
Level: 44

Posts: 314/830
EXP: 584360
For next: 26925

Since: 03-15-04
From: Duluth, MN

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 01-14-05 09:21 AM Link | Quote
Testing posivite results in these penalties:
1st: up to 10 game suspension
2nd: 30 game suspension
3rd: 60 game suspension
4th: 1 year

All of these are without pay.
5th: you are at the mercy of Bud Selig

Testing posivite means that the name is released to the public for all to know and see (and ridicule if necessary).

New substances were added to the ban list, but no stimulants were. This new policy takes effect immediately (unless I'm reading it wrong). The deal runs until 2008.

This whole issue was brought up for two reasons:
1. Grand jury testimony was leaked, Jason Giambi reports to using steroids.
2. Barry Bonds testifies he unknowingly used steroids.

Senator John McCain said that if a new much stronger policy was not in place by January, he would introduce legislature to Congress to make a policy for MLB.

Here's my question, if Bud Selig wanted a zero tolerance (as he has stated) why didn't he just accept anything but? He could've given the specifics to McCain, and it could've gone through as such. Something I'm missing?

Anyway, thoughts?
drjayphd

Beamos
What's that spell?




pimp!
Level: 56

Posts: 818/1477
EXP: 1387410
For next: 10766

Since: 03-15-04
From: CT

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 01-14-05 11:07 AM Link | Quote
I can't see him working with McCain. As much as it'd help him get his way, major sports leagues treasure autonomy. Why do you think NBA commish David Stern didn't want an arbitrator fiddling with the suspensions he handed out for the brawl?

Either way, it's refreshing to see a steroid policy with some teeth. Maybe not a full set, but you've gotta go through baby teeth, right? It's kind of foolish to expect them to have something like the NFL's policy. In terms of power and influence:

MLBPA > all
potted plant > NFLPA

There's just no way they'd get anything like THAT through (test positive once, get the hook for a quarter of the season). Just too much power. (Then again, people DID say we wouldn't see a meaningful policy in baseball due to the union, but the clean players got sick of a few bad apples and pushed for it.)
Colleen
Administrator
Level: 136

Posts: 6172/11302
EXP: 29369328
For next: 727587

Since: 03-15-04
From: LaSalle, Quebec, Canada

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 01-14-05 09:30 PM Link | Quote
What did Richard Pound say in the paper today... something along the lines of "Now you have to rob the liquor store 4 times before you go to jail."

It's an improvement but at the same time it's not strict enough - and I don't think it's ever going to get to that level unless you're willing to suspend dozens of players at once.
Emptyeye
I am a real American!
Real American
Level: 67

Posts: 1247/2273
EXP: 2488421
For next: 104451

Since: 05-24-04
From: I DUNNOOOOOOOO!!

Since last post: 9 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 01-15-05 03:28 AM Link | Quote
As mentioned before, it's an improvement, but it's probably not going to get much better than this.

What bugged me was Selig's yapping about "we're acting to restore confidence in our great game." Bullshit, Selig, you're acting because you didn't want the federal government getting involved in setting policies. Same goes for the union, who as you'll recall initially opposed testing of ANY kind.

In short, it's a start--and the humiliation of being found out will likely dispel most users--but it's more a PR move than anything else.
Toxic
in a sublime state of mind
Level: 75

Posts: 2284/2857
EXP: 3732709
For next: 94195

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 8 hours
Posted on 01-15-05 05:24 AM Link | Quote
It's too bad unions are greedy out of their freaking minds.

Sigh, oh well. Maybe baseball will be fun to watch again.
Lenophis

Super Koopa
Level: 44

Posts: 316/830
EXP: 584360
For next: 26925

Since: 03-15-04
From: Duluth, MN

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 01-15-05 08:06 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Toxic
It's too bad unions are greedy out of their freaking minds.

Sigh, oh well. Maybe baseball will be fun to watch again.

MLB is suffering because of this union. The sport would be a little better off if every detail didn't go through them.

At least they aren't the NHL owners...

It's definately a start, but doesn't go far enough yet. Here's my question, will the numbers overall go down for this season and the next few to follow?


but it's more a PR move than anything else.

Baseball needs all the good PR it can get right now.
Toxic
in a sublime state of mind
Level: 75

Posts: 2288/2857
EXP: 3732709
For next: 94195

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 8 hours
Posted on 01-15-05 08:39 PM Link | Quote
No kidding.

people like Scott Moronass or whatever his name is hurt the game
Colleen
Administrator
Level: 136

Posts: 6205/11302
EXP: 29369328
For next: 727587

Since: 03-15-04
From: LaSalle, Quebec, Canada

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 01-16-05 09:00 AM Link | Quote
I don't know about the PR thing - this year was the best for baseball in recent memory, with close playoff races and the fans turning out in droves.

I think that they need to keep it under control before it becomes a huge fiasco that affects the fanbase though.
Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Sports Center - MLB implements new steroid policy | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.007 seconds.