Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
2 users currently in General Chat: Ailure, Dark Vampriel | 1 guest
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - General Chat - Ethics | |
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
BookReader

Ninji
Level: 25

Posts: 176/232
EXP: 86317
For next: 3303

Since: 03-15-04
From: Albuquerque, New Mexico (Land of Disenchantment)

Since last post: 22 days
Last activity: 2 days
Posted on 10-28-04 10:32 PM Link | Quote
Ethics: Suppose you knew that somebody
Smallhacker

Green Birdo

SMW Hacking Moderator
Level: 68

Posts: 777/2273
EXP: 2647223
For next: 81577

Since: 03-15-04
From: Söderhamn, Sweden

Since last post: 10 hours
Last activity: 9 hours
Posted on 10-28-04 10:33 PM Link | Quote
The needs of the many outweights the needs of the few.
Legion
banning people for no reason sure is fun
Level: 101

Posts: 2688/5657
EXP: 10399737
For next: 317938

Since: 03-15-04
From: The Crossroads is under attack!

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 5 days
Posted on 10-28-04 10:34 PM Link | Quote
No, because if you knew that, then you could surely think of many other ways to prevent it other than killing. Simple.
Cymoro
PATRICK DUFFY WILL LASER YOUR SOUL


Level: 67

Posts: 1427/2216
EXP: 2549743
For next: 43129

Since: 03-15-04
From: Cymoro Gaming

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 10-28-04 10:42 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by BookReader
be the next Hitler, would lead your country into a wrongful war and kill millions of your countrymen for no good reason.


This is not, in any way, a hidden refrence to Bush =O

That aside, I would not kill them. That's a selfish thing to do, no matter how widescale of an effect it would make if I weren't to kill him. Besides, I can just make him live in poverty, that should be easy enough.
Kitten Yiffer

Purple wand
Furry moderator
Vivent l'exp����¯�¿�½������©rience de signalisation d'amusement, ou bien !
Level: 135

Posts: 5632/11162
EXP: 28824106
For next: 510899

Since: 03-15-04
From: Sweden

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 4 min.
Posted on 10-28-04 10:45 PM Link | Quote
I would just give him a flue or something, that's right. I'm going to try if the chaos theory is right.

In other words, I would try to change some things in his life. There and here so he won't even have a political career.
Ran-chan

Moldorm
eek, when are they going to stop growing...
Level: 143

Posts: 4576/12781
EXP: 35293588
For next: 538220

Since: 03-15-04
From: Nerima District, Tokyo - Japan

Since last post: 12 hours
Last activity: 12 hours
Posted on 10-28-04 11:58 PM Link | Quote
No, because how the hell would you know if he was growing up to be a new Hitler?

Is Bush killing his own countrymen?
Darth Coby

Vire
Dacht je nou echt dat het over was?
Dacht je nou echt dat ik gebroken was? Nee toch?
Nou kijk eens goed op uit je ogen gast.
zonder clic heb je geen kloten tjap... bitch
Level: 55

Posts: 917/1371
EXP: 1240774
For next: 73415

Since: 03-15-04
From: Belgium

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 9 hours
Posted on 10-29-04 01:17 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Millennium Neko
No, because how the hell would you know if he was growing up to be a new Hitler?

Is Bush killing his own countrymen?


If you count in sending America's army to a lame useless war, yeah.
Anya

The Exile
Ultima Mezcla de Yin Yan

Level: 98

Posts: 3332/5337
EXP: 9530313
For next: 124040

Since: 03-15-04
From: South Florida

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 2 days
Posted on 10-29-04 02:57 AM Link | Quote
Why kill the parent? Why not the offspring?

Its like..what would happen if you would have killed Darth Vader's mother -- you then kill Vader, and in return, no Luke, Leia..heck, no Star Wars....could you live that?

The Guru of Furu

Ninji
Level: 26

Posts: 98/240
EXP: 90642
For next: 11633

Since: 03-18-04
From: Cali

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 7 hours
Posted on 10-29-04 04:23 AM Link | Quote
how about you just imprisson the kid for life, or just send him to space or something.
kitty
Come on babe, pet the pussy ;)
Level: 70

Posts: 1231/2449
EXP: 2962406
For next: 53405

Since: 03-15-04
From: Scranton, PA, USA

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 10-29-04 04:34 AM Link | Quote
No - if YOU are doing the act of murder to prevent a future/theoretical murder, it is unethical.

However, if your intent is to merely STOP a murder from happening in the PRESENT (say he is pointing a gun at a Quick-E-Mart attendant and threatening to shoot), then it IS ethical to kill him IF it is required (in other words, if you have a stun gun and a .45, you must ethically use the stun gun). Even though I would rather use a shotgun, if I had a shotgun and a cattle prod on me*, if I DID use the shotgun, I could be prosecuted for "Use of Unnecessary Force" - although, in 9/10 circumstances, I'd be let off scott-free, it's technically unethical'...

* - I'm taking the role of a lost redneck who came in for a map.
' - Anyone desperate enough to rob a Quick-E-Mart in a rural farmland does, IMO, deserve to be treated unethically
Apple

Kodondo
Level: 38

Posts: 474/594
EXP: 350163
For next: 20284

Since: 03-27-04
From: Washington.

Since last post: 264 days
Last activity: 152 days
Posted on 10-29-04 04:35 AM Link | Quote
The future is rewritten countless times every second, you can't know for sure that kid will be the next Hitler.
Reshaper256

Bee
Level: 19

Posts: 80/143
EXP: 34776
For next: 1001

Since: 09-14-04
From: United States

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 9 hours
Posted on 10-29-04 04:57 AM Link | Quote
Darn, that is a tough question.

Of course, every one of us would choose to let the innocent person live, if there was another, better alternative that would stop the suffering of millions later on. I don't think the question was raised with that in mind however. If my only choice was to kill the innocent woman now, to stop terrible events in the future -- and I *know* that if I don't do that precise thing, those terrible events will happen, I believe I'd have to do it.

Keep in mind that this child prevented from being born isn't actually Hitler, just like him, so you're not actually changing the course of events that have occured via "time-travel" or anything. You're altering your own future, like you could with any decision in your life. Look at it this way, if you had the choice to push a button and kill an innocent woman, or to push another button that lets thousands upon thousands of other innocent people die and suffer, which would you push?

Thankfully our daily decisions aren't presented to us in such a way. We don't have the gift of such dreadful foresight, and for that I have to be thankful.
Cymoro
PATRICK DUFFY WILL LASER YOUR SOUL


Level: 67

Posts: 1428/2216
EXP: 2549743
For next: 43129

Since: 03-15-04
From: Cymoro Gaming

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 10-29-04 06:51 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Yiffy Kitten
No - if YOU are doing the act of murder to prevent a future/theoretical murder, it is unethical.

However, if your intent is to merely STOP a murder from happening in the PRESENT (say he is pointing a gun at a Quick-E-Mart attendant and threatening to shoot), then it IS ethical to kill him IF it is required (in other words, if you have a stun gun and a .45, you must ethically use the stun gun). Even though I would rather use a shotgun, if I had a shotgun and a cattle prod on me*, if I DID use the shotgun, I could be prosecuted for "Use of Unnecessary Force" - although, in 9/10 circumstances, I'd be let off scott-free, it's technically unethical'...

* - I'm taking the role of a lost redneck who came in for a map.
' - Anyone desperate enough to rob a Quick-E-Mart in a rural farmland does, IMO, deserve to be treated unethically
hhallahh

Bob-Omb
Level: 38

Posts: 413/607
EXP: 365476
For next: 4971

Since: 03-15-04
From: Portland, OR

Since last post: 73 days
Last activity: 60 days
Posted on 10-29-04 09:12 AM Link | Quote
The problem with these questions, of course, assumes the existence of a moral reality.

I wouldn't say it's right or wrong... I'd simply say it's "smart" to kill that person, or his child, or whatever. Unless, of course, you stand to benefit from the next Hitler's rule.


(edited by hhallahh on 10-29-04 12:12 AM)
Zem
You can be civil without being flowery, dipshits.
Level: 49

Posts: 246/1107
EXP: 829398
For next: 54485

Since: 06-13-04

Since last post: 131 days
Last activity: 131 days
Posted on 10-29-04 09:20 AM Link | Quote
What hhallahh said. We're assuming for the purposes of this question that we know completely... so under that belief, even if we're batshit fucking crazy, it's better to eliminate the child.

Of course, it depends on the specificity of the prediction. If all we know is that the child is going to "cause a war", causing deaths etc., perhaps it's his unjust execution that would provoke this.
Apple

Kodondo
Level: 38

Posts: 481/594
EXP: 350163
For next: 20284

Since: 03-27-04
From: Washington.

Since last post: 264 days
Last activity: 152 days
Posted on 10-29-04 12:08 PM Link | Quote
Hitler wasn't born evil.

Saying some parents offspring will be the next Hitler and killing the parent for it, is just as justifiable as going out and killing everymember of society for helping to create such a person.


If the person was already alive and was I dunno, in their preteens and already showing signs or brutality (Pushing kids off roofs, stabbing them with scissors) than I could see killing the kid a little bit more ethical, I would still prefor to have the kid go through therpy and everything instead though.
Legion
banning people for no reason sure is fun
Level: 101

Posts: 2692/5657
EXP: 10399737
For next: 317938

Since: 03-15-04
From: The Crossroads is under attack!

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 5 days
Posted on 10-29-04 12:18 PM Link | Quote
I'm not sure if some of you understand. First, we know that the child will turn out to do horrendous things. But in knowing that, we can EASILY prevent it. I don't see what's so hard to comprehend about that.
Zem
You can be civil without being flowery, dipshits.
Level: 49

Posts: 247/1107
EXP: 829398
For next: 54485

Since: 06-13-04

Since last post: 131 days
Last activity: 131 days
Posted on 10-29-04 01:06 PM Link | Quote
This question is often framed in the context of a mysterious supercomputer that has predicted everyone's future career perfectly for some large number of years, such as five thousand. Then one day it predicts this kid will bring the downfall of civilization, blah blah blah. The question is unrealistic, though: it is based on the assumption that we know for a fact what the kid will do (the "supercomputer" is just one way of trying to get this concept across), and is therefore more a question of heart (or balls) than ethics. Will you kill the kid, if you KNOW he's going to fuck it all up?

In real life, obviously, we never know for sure. And it's rare that there's a situation where we have a kid who will probably do something horrible in the future. All this question weeds out is the people who say "no" to killing the kid, who will definitely stay on the passive side in a real-life scenario where the outcome is not certain.

This question could be applied allegorically to any number of situations today, but who cares? It really doesn't mean anything. I say, kill the kid in this scenario, but that doesn't mean shit in real life. =(
BMF98567
BLACK HAS BUILT A SILLY DICE-MAZE!
GO!

Current list of BURNING FURY >8( recipients:
- Yiffy Kitten (x2)
- Xkeeper
Level: 53

Posts: 441/1261
EXP: 1094149
For next: 62970

Since: 03-15-04
From: Blobaria
Special Move: Rising Meatloaf Backhand Combo

Since last post: 21 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 10-29-04 01:34 PM Link | Quote
Just shoot the father-to-be in the nads. Bingo, he lives, and he has no evil offspring.
The SomerZ
Summer, yay!
Level: 45

Posts: 562/862
EXP: 618182
For next: 41982

Since: 03-15-04
From: Norway

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 10-29-04 01:48 PM Link | Quote
From a utilitarian point of view: Go ahead, pull the trigger.
From a deontological point of view: Don't kill him.

Me? I'm a consequentialist.


(edited by The SomerZ on 10-29-04 04:49 AM)
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - General Chat - Ethics | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.020 seconds.