Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
0 user currently in Brain Teasers. | 2 guests
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Brain Teasers - Useless Trivia about Math Game | |
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
neotransotaku

Baby Mario
戻れたら、
誰も気が付く
Level: 87

Posts: 825/4016
EXP: 6220548
For next: 172226

Since: 03-15-04
From: Outside of Time/Space

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 06-23-04 08:46 AM Link | Quote
Okay, this game is going against your normal math trivia games where you are given numbers and asked to obtain a numerical result. Instead, I'm going to pose questions about math and see how much obscure knowledge of math you know or some facts that may or may not be interesting to you.

Anyways, if you understand that last paragraph, good for you because I sure didn't.

The format will be I pose a question and you answer that question. If you get it right, you get 1 point. If i feel that the question was ridiculously hard, I'll give you bonus points at my discretion. Wakarimashita?

Okay, here are the questions:

1) We all learned to multiply by hand in elementary school and there were steps to multiply numbers more than 1 digit. For example, to multiply 11 x 12, we would write down something that will look like this in the end.

 11
x12
---
22
11
---
132
Therefore, the question is this: What is the name of this method? (5 points)



6) Give a strong reason why 1 can't be a prime number. (2 points)

7) What is special about this prime number: (101951) x (101975 + 1991991991991991991991991) + 1



10) What is special about this: 1 + (1 / (5 + (1/2)))




(edited by neotransotaku on 08-09-04 03:31 AM)
Heian-794

Red Super Koopa
Level: 44

Posts: 124/896
EXP: 611014
For next: 271

Since: 06-01-04
From: Kyoto, Japan

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 10 days
Posted on 06-23-04 09:27 AM Link | Quote
1. It has a name? ;

2. The fundamental theorem of arithmetic states that any integer has only one prime factorization (combination of prime factors).

3. I remember Peano for his fractal "curve", which fills space yet has no actual area, IIRC. But I'm sure he did a lot of other nifty things which would make better answers to your question.
neotransotaku

Baby Mario
戻れたら、
誰も気が付く
Level: 87

Posts: 834/4016
EXP: 6220548
For next: 172226

Since: 03-15-04
From: Outside of Time/Space

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 06-23-04 09:37 AM Link | Quote
1) Yes it has a name

2) correct--The fundamental theorm of arithmetic states every whole number greater than 1 can be expressed as a product of prime numbers in one and only one way.

Who would have thunk that such basic math has a theorem

3) I reprased the question so try again

---

Current point totals:

Heian-794 - 1 point


(edited by neotransotaku on 06-23-04 12:41 AM)
Ed

Lantern Ghost
Level: 42

Posts: 399/761
EXP: 512715
For next: 8647

Since: 03-16-04
From: Dublin, Ireland

Since last post: 215 days
Last activity: 25 days
Posted on 06-23-04 11:20 PM Link | Quote
1. We just called it long mutlipication

2. Bah, I knew this one, but I'm too late.

3. Dunno
Heian-794

Red Super Koopa
Level: 44

Posts: 132/896
EXP: 611014
For next: 271

Since: 06-01-04
From: Kyoto, Japan

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 10 days
Posted on 06-24-04 12:04 AM Link | Quote
3. Actually I remember learning this. Peano defined zero, and then each succeeding number as being the number that comes after the previous one, and then said that if you can prove things about the previous numbers, by induction you can prove it for the number you're looking at now.

That's not exact but it's basically what he's doing.

Mind if other people pose questions?
neotransotaku

Baby Mario
戻れたら、
誰も気が付く
Level: 87

Posts: 862/4016
EXP: 6220548
For next: 172226

Since: 03-15-04
From: Outside of Time/Space

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 06-24-04 12:27 AM Link | Quote
3 is close enough so i'll give you the point.
As for posting questions...let me work myself into a rut first...

---

Current Point Totals:

Heian-794 - 2 points

---

Questions

1) We all learned to multiply by hand in elementary school and there were steps to multiply numbers more than 1 digit. For example, to multiply 11 x 12, we would write down something that will look like this in the end.

 11
x12
---
22
11
---
132
Therefore, the question is this: What is the name of this method?

4) Give an example of a trancendental number.

5) Which civilization was the first documented civilization to use negative numbers?


(edited by neotransotaku on 06-23-04 03:27 PM)
(edited by neotransotaku on 06-24-04 02:27 PM)
Heian-794

Red Super Koopa
Level: 44

Posts: 135/896
EXP: 611014
For next: 271

Since: 06-01-04
From: Kyoto, Japan

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 10 days
Posted on 06-24-04 12:38 PM Link | Quote
4. e (2.718281828459045...) is transcendental.

5. Since around AD 1000 or earlier, the Chinese would indicate negative numbers by using black sticks on their counting boards instead of the usual red. When writing on paper, they'd put a diagonal slash through the last digit. You can see some examples in Georges Ifrah's "From One To Zero" and Karl Menninger's "Number Words and Number Symbols". I love these two books.

But someone may have been earlier. I'll rack my brain before Googling it. ;
neotransotaku

Baby Mario
戻れたら、
誰も気が付く
Level: 87

Posts: 892/4016
EXP: 6220548
For next: 172226

Since: 03-15-04
From: Outside of Time/Space

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 06-24-04 11:28 PM Link | Quote
#4) yup...e is a transcental number...

#5) nope...it weren't the chinese

---

Current Point Totals:

Heian-794 - 3 points
Heian-794

Red Super Koopa
Level: 44

Posts: 146/896
EXP: 611014
For next: 271

Since: 06-01-04
From: Kyoto, Japan

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 10 days
Posted on 06-25-04 12:33 AM Link | Quote
Well, the Chinese seem to have gotten the idea from the Indians, though the Indians didn't have the good notation that the Chinese did.

Does this question have a definite answer, or is one culture just sort of assumed to be first?
Slash Dafter

Kodondo
Level: 38

Posts: 302/584
EXP: 338934
For next: 31513

Since: 04-04-04
From: E. Millinocket, ME

Since last post: 9 hours
Last activity: 9 hours
Posted on 06-28-04 01:23 AM Link | Quote
5. Sumerians?
KATW

King Yoshi
"If you stare at something long enough, it can be funny."
Level: 86

Posts: 1099/3959
EXP: 6087979
For next: 54128

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 7 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
Posted on 06-30-04 05:08 AM Link | Quote
Im thinking 5 is... the japanese(because they do everything for some reason)
Heian-794

Red Super Koopa
Level: 44

Posts: 177/896
EXP: 611014
For next: 271

Since: 06-01-04
From: Kyoto, Japan

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 10 days
Posted on 06-30-04 03:58 PM Link | Quote
It's not the Japanese. They have however gotten really good at using negative numbers in recent years, what with them popping up on investment return-relsted charts all the time!

I'll say the Indians were the first to do mathematics with negative numbers. IIRC, they used colors for different variables rather than the letters that we use.
Apocalypse

Red Cheep-cheep
Level: 24

Posts: 198/203
EXP: 69055
For next: 9070

Since: 04-11-04
From: Australia

Since last post: 482 days
Last activity: 339 days
Posted on 07-03-04 10:21 AM Link | Quote
Is Question 5 the egyptians?
kornfan
There's a BARB in my EYE!
No reregistering, Mr. Permabanned!
Level: 38

Posts: 206/622
EXP: 344540
For next: 25907

Since: 06-27-04
From: the middle of fu**ing nowhere...

Since last post: 414 days
Last activity: 297 days
Posted on 07-11-04 02:36 AM Link | Quote
I'm going to guess that 5 is either greece, or phoenecia.
Heian-794

Red Super Koopa
Level: 44

Posts: 241/896
EXP: 611014
For next: 271

Since: 06-01-04
From: Kyoto, Japan

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 10 days
Posted on 07-11-04 07:55 PM Link | Quote
Are we going to get an answer to this one, Neo, or what?
kornfan
There's a BARB in my EYE!
No reregistering, Mr. Permabanned!
Level: 38

Posts: 224/622
EXP: 344540
For next: 25907

Since: 06-27-04
From: the middle of fu**ing nowhere...

Since last post: 414 days
Last activity: 297 days
Posted on 07-12-04 03:24 AM Link | Quote
Perhaps we should guess continuously until we get it right. Sparta. I'm out of ancient civilations. Oh yeah. maya inca aztec
Cymoro
PATRICK DUFFY WILL LASER YOUR SOUL


Level: 67

Posts: 850/2216
EXP: 2549743
For next: 43129

Since: 03-15-04
From: Cymoro Gaming

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
Posted on 07-12-04 06:13 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by neotransotaku
1) We all learned to multiply by hand in elementary school and there were steps to multiply numbers more than 1 digit. For example, to multiply 11 x 12, we would write down something that will look like this in the end.

 11
x12
---
22
11
---
132
Therefore, the question is this: What is the name of this method?


Cross multiplication.



5) Which civilization was the first documented civilization to use negative numbers?


If my history class was right, China.
neotransotaku

Baby Mario
戻れたら、
誰も気が付く
Level: 87

Posts: 989/4016
EXP: 6220548
For next: 172226

Since: 03-15-04
From: Outside of Time/Space

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 07-12-04 07:58 AM Link | Quote
okay...my bad...real life got into my way

---

anyways...

Heian will get #5 since the chinese were the first to use it. I had the people from India in mind but they were the first to allow negative numbers in their mathematic system. Basically, my question was worded incorrectly XD

Cross multiplication answer for #1 is incorrect. that is not the "official" name of the method.

---

Point totals

Heian-794 - 4 points

---

Questions:

1) We all learned to multiply by hand in elementary school and there were steps to multiply numbers more than 1 digit. For example, to multiply 11 x 12, we would write down something that will look like this in the end.

 11
x12
---
22
11
---
132
Therefore, the question is this: What is the name of this method?

6) Why can't 1 be a prime number?

7) What is special about this prime number: (101951) x (101975 + 1991991991991991991991991) + 1

8) What is the largest number that is considered useful in mathematics?

9) What does N represent in N + 1 = N? (Hint: it deals with sets)

10) What is special about this: 1 + (1 / (5 + (1/2)))

11) How many digits are the largest known twin primes?

12) What's a repunit?

13) What woman has a type of number named after her?
NSNick
Laidback Admin
Level: 85

Posts: 635/3875
EXP: 5895841
For next: 2699

Since: 03-15-04
From: North Side
School: OSU


Since last post: 9 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
Posted on 07-12-04 08:41 AM Link | Quote
6) I believe the definition of prime numbers is that they have exactly two factors. 1 only has one factor- itself.

9) The null set?

Heian-794

Red Super Koopa
Level: 44

Posts: 252/896
EXP: 611014
For next: 271

Since: 06-01-04
From: Kyoto, Japan

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 10 days
Posted on 07-12-04 01:39 PM Link | Quote
7. It has almost four thousand consecutive zeroes in it!

8. The Skewes number, useful in Ramsey theory, is ludicrously huge and needs special "arrow notation" to be expressed. (Arrow notation: I'll write an A since western encoding doesn't contain an arrow. In short, 3 A 3 means 3 ^ 3 ^ 3, or a tower of successively exponentiating threes. Imagine what 99999 A 99999 would look like.)

10. This equals 1 + (1 + 2/11), which is... uhh... almost exactly 0.7 less than e?

12. A repunit is a number like 111, 11111111, etc. Many of these have interesting properties which I can't be faffed to look up right now. ;

13. Does this have anything to do with Catalan numbers by any chance?

No time to research anything today; this stuff is by the seat of my pants!
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Brain Teasers - Useless Trivia about Math Game | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.041 seconds.