Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
0 user currently in Lost Section.
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Lost Section - Such a thing as random? | |
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
King_Killa

Koopa
Level: 15

Posts: 30/117
EXP: 15096
For next: 1288

Since: 06-13-05
From: Shangri-La

Since last post: 37 days
Last activity: 18 days
Posted on 06-17-05 07:44 PM Link | Quote
Scientists say that the brain is random in the sense that brain waves can not be predicted. If you pick a number from 0 to 1,000,000 (NOT your favorite numbers, just choose a number which has no meaning to you). That can be considered random.
knuck

Hinox
Banned until 19-58-5815: trolling, flaming, spamming, being a general fucktard...
Level: 62

Posts: 1332/1818
EXP: 1894574
For next: 90112

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 9 hours
Posted on 06-18-05 01:12 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Legion
I'm posting in this thread.

Why?

Because I chose to.
Why did you choose that?
The truth.
kitty
Come on babe, pet the pussy ;)
Level: 70

Posts: 1488/2449
EXP: 2962406
For next: 53405

Since: 03-15-04
From: Scranton, PA, USA

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 06-18-05 01:13 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by King_Killa
If you pick a number from 0 to 1,000,000 (NOT your favorite numbers, just choose a number which has no meaning to you). That can be considered random.
No, it's not random. Why? Because you're making a conscious decision what number to pick. It's not predetermined, but that doesn't make it random.

The concept of randomness is theoretical, of course. But ||bass is right - particle decay is the best example of "Random" you can possibly get. In radioactive decay, you can approximate the half-life of a substance, but you can NEVER know which atoms will be the ones that decay. For example, in 238 grams of Uranium, there are about 602,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 atoms. Half will decay in 23 minutes, but which specific atoms will do it? It's random.
King_Killa

Koopa
Level: 15

Posts: 31/117
EXP: 15096
For next: 1288

Since: 06-13-05
From: Shangri-La

Since last post: 37 days
Last activity: 18 days
Posted on 06-18-05 04:10 AM Link | Quote
I don't see how you are making a conscious decision. If I say a number wihtout even thinking about it, I didn't "decide" on that number so to say. I just said it randomly.
kitty
Come on babe, pet the pussy ;)
Level: 70

Posts: 1489/2449
EXP: 2962406
For next: 53405

Since: 03-15-04
From: Scranton, PA, USA

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 06-18-05 05:40 AM Link | Quote
Whether you know it or not, there are subconscious decisions at stake in the choice of that number. You probably would never pick 1 or 2 because it'd be too low, but you'd probably pick 756,237 twice before picking, say, 4.
King_Killa

Koopa
Level: 15

Posts: 32/117
EXP: 15096
For next: 1288

Since: 06-13-05
From: Shangri-La

Since last post: 37 days
Last activity: 18 days
Posted on 06-18-05 05:56 AM Link | Quote
ok, that's true enough. But I do feel there is randomness in one's mind, maybe not in the decision of a number, but in other ways.
Snika

Boo
Level: 44

Posts: 100/916
EXP: 600678
For next: 10607

Since: 07-21-04
From: Freezing Cold Alaska!

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 2 days
Posted on 06-18-05 01:23 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by NSNick
Originally posted by Snika
Nonrandomness in humans could be what seperates us from computers. Lets say randomness ONLY existed in computers. If you tell a computer to pick a random number, it will. No deciding factors... No gravity, no hand to grab the clothes.

Not true. The numbers computers choose are not random, but predetermined.


Thats what I was kinda goin' for in my next paragraph about deciding factors in computers.
=P Snika
Danielle

Local Moderator
Level: 76

Posts: 414/3359
EXP: 3958078
For next: 47982

Since: 09-15-04
From: RATE

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 06-19-05 08:42 AM Link | Quote
..huh. That was interesting to read about. When I think "random" I think of something out of the ordinary. I dont consider it like a number a computer chooses, because a machine isn't random. Is it? There's a reason for everything that happens involving machines.. I think.
paraplayer

Snifit
Level: 22

Posts: 90/280
EXP: 57271
For next: 1079

Since: 06-06-05

Since last post: 44 days
Last activity: 44 days
Posted on 06-19-05 08:50 AM Link | Quote
indeed.

Computers cannot be random just incredibly chaotic.

the big question really is if a computer can be comparable to a human brain. I've always wondered if the "Creative side" of your brain can produce a purely random number without being affected by stimuli.

...Anybody on this board a brain surgeon? we could really use your help.
Danielle

Local Moderator
Level: 76

Posts: 415/3359
EXP: 3958078
For next: 47982

Since: 09-15-04
From: RATE

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
Posted on 06-19-05 08:52 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by paraplayer
indeed.

Computers cannot be random just incredibly chaotic.

the big question really is if a computer can be comparable to a human brain. I've always wondered if the "Creative side" of your brain can produce a purely random number without being affected by stimuli.

...Anybody on this board a brain surgeon? we could really use your help.


Well with what some are saying, you DO have to think of a number. You have to pick one, no matter how random you want it to be. It requires choosing. So it cant be random, can it?
nayno

Micro-Goomba
Level: 6

Posts: 7/10
EXP: 616
For next: 291

Since: 10-18-04

Since last post: 97 days
Last activity: 104 days
Posted on 07-12-05 11:38 AM Link | Quote
I did a lot of thinking on this and it eventually became the basis for my entire philosophy. Ever since "discovering" that free will was an illusion, I became a firm believer in fate. Consider that, perhaps, there is only one possible outcome in the universe, which in turn would mean that everything we're doing now is geared toward a predestined event. I had never been very spiritual, but suddenly I was looking at seemingly insignificant things and seeing them as part of a magnificently complex structure. Suddenly, there was a reason for everything to exist: to do its part in insuring our fate. It made me very happy.

Of course, I've since realized that even a purely logical religion has its flaws, as logic is a tool of man, and the things that men create are almost certainly fallible. The concepts of "Cause" and "Effect" are mere illusions, born from humanity's all-too-linear perception of time. The order of events as chronicled by human memory is of course a valid sequence, but not the only one. Since THIS realization, I've felt that the only thing we can truly trust is our intuition.
Happybunnie84

Red Paragoomba
Level: 11

Posts: 54/63
EXP: 5460
For next: 525

Since: 07-06-05
From: P-Town, Illinois

Since last post: 102 days
Last activity: 92 days
Posted on 07-13-05 02:40 AM Link | Quote
Milk.



random....



Tetris?


(edited by Happybunnie84 on 07-12-05 05:40 PM)
paraplayer

Snifit
Level: 22

Posts: 228/280
EXP: 57271
For next: 1079

Since: 06-06-05

Since last post: 44 days
Last activity: 44 days
Posted on 07-13-05 02:52 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by nayno
I did a lot of thinking on this and it eventually became the basis for my entire philosophy. Ever since "discovering" that free will was an illusion, I became a firm believer in fate. Consider that, perhaps, there is only one possible outcome in the universe, which in turn would mean that everything we're doing now is geared toward a predestined event. I had never been very spiritual, but suddenly I was looking at seemingly insignificant things and seeing them as part of a magnificently complex structure. Suddenly, there was a reason for everything to exist: to do its part in insuring our fate. It made me very happy.

Of course, I've since realized that even a purely logical religion has its flaws, as logic is a tool of man, and the things that men create are almost certainly fallible. The concepts of "Cause" and "Effect" are mere illusions, born from humanity's all-too-linear perception of time. The order of events as chronicled by human memory is of course a valid sequence, but not the only one. Since THIS realization, I've felt that the only thing we can truly trust is our intuition.


What makes you think your intuition is anymore accurate.
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 4566/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 07-13-05 02:58 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Happybunnie84
Milk.



random....



Tetris?


For emphasis.

Random as a mathematical concept is pretty much every where. Statistically, random spikes are merely environmental changes. Historically random events are things that are difficult to explain. "WHY DIDN'T HITLER SUPPLY HIS RUSSIAN FRONT!?", etc. They're generally things for psych-historians to discern. Things like asteroids hitting the earth are generally random events that can be applied to a general model, etc.
nayno

Micro-Goomba
Level: 6

Posts: 9/10
EXP: 616
For next: 291

Since: 10-18-04

Since last post: 97 days
Last activity: 104 days
Posted on 07-14-05 01:05 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by paraplayer
What makes you think your intuition is anymore accurate.


No rational reason. Just a sense of faith and a spiritual connection with the world around me. I've never been religious, but I do feel as though there is something guiding us. The way I see it, the universe is way too complex and sophisticated to exist by chance or without a purpose.

The reason why anything exists at all (as opposed to some kind of oblivion) is a mystery in and of itself. It's like there's this story that just had to be told, because otherwise, things would be too dull. Oblivion gets pretty boring. So things were created, to tell that story.

Of course, this is all just my belief... and I'm certainly not going to claim it as fact, or even a rational concept. The whole thing banks on the flaws of human logic, after all. Hoorah! I've created a paradox.
Pages: 1 2Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Lost Section - Such a thing as random? | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.015 seconds.