Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
0 user currently in World Affairs / Debate.
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - World Affairs / Debate - War in Iraq | |
Pages: 1 2 3 4Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Can the war in Iraq be justified?
Yes
 
41.7%, 10 votes
No
 
50.0%, 12 votes
Don't know
 
8.3%, 2 votes
Multi-voting is disabled.

User Post
geeogree

Bloober
Level: 34

Posts: 361/448
EXP: 231583
For next: 22068

Since: 03-16-04
From: Calgary, Canada

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 11 hours
Posted on 06-02-05 09:16 PM Link | Quote
bah.... if the US wants oil.... why not come get the largest supply they can get...

Canada's!!!!!

there is more oil in Canada than there is in basically any other country... and the price is high enough that we can actually bother getting at it
Vulkar

Red Paragoomba
Level: 12

Posts: 8/61
EXP: 6073
For next: 1848

Since: 05-24-05

Since last post: 53 days
Last activity: 10 hours
Posted on 06-03-05 04:42 AM Link | Quote
Slay, I never attacked or insulted, I offered my opinion.

And Emporer, you didn't answer my question. Where is the oil? Many witnesses claim that we are leaving the oil there, and having no effect.

Lastly, I never said that our goal was to eliminate potential threats, I simply said that's what put Iraq over Arabia, which I still believe has more oil.

Finally, what statements have I given that were false?
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 3995/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 06-03-05 05:20 AM Link | Quote
"Two months later, the come over. If you're smart, what are they going to find? Nothing.
_____________________

This is exactly what happened in Iraq. Hussein showed a small degree of common sense, and thought it might be a good idea to move his weapons.

Also, why did he pick Iraq to help? Iraq had the largest chance to actually be a threat. If it was about oil, why not Arabia? Sure, it helped, but why Iraq over Arabia? Whichever had the largest threat is the best one to eliminate. "

That part is wrong. There is, as of yet, no proof that Saddam moved his weapons. The facilities were either destroyed or abandoned during Gulf War I. As is Iraq being the bigger threat. Your Saudi "allies" fund terror. Saddam Hussein didn't. And what you believe about oil is wrong. Saudia Arabia has larger oil (and water) reserves than Iraq. And where is the oil? In these things called barrels, that are shipped to refineries and being burnt as fuels in cars. And I've never heard these "witnesses". You're not leaving the oil there, you contracted Haliburton to get it out of the ground.

geeogree, as much as I love how the Canadian oil industry is taking off, the oil sands are hella expensive to refine. Too much energy without enough output.
Slay

Level: 25

Posts: 143/339
EXP: 85592
For next: 4028

Since: 04-28-05
From: Threshold Between Heaven and Hell

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
Posted on 06-04-05 11:23 AM Link | Quote
The Vulkar says...
You all disagree with the war in Iraq after you learned that there weren't any WOMDs in Iraq. I'm going to have to provide a nice question for you.


That's what I was talking about when I said "attack." Your entire post following this point was attacking other people's opinions. You could have said, "Here's what I think." You chose to say, "So that's what you guys think, huh? Well, how about this?" You weren't simply voicing your opinion, you were trying to destroy the credibility of other people's.

And I said you were misinformed, not false.
Arwon

Zora
Level: 35

Posts: 299/506
EXP: 278115
For next: 1821

Since: 03-15-04
From: Terra Australis Incognita

Since last post: 5 hours
Last activity: 10 min.
Posted on 06-04-05 03:39 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Vulkar
Okay, someone who approves strongly about the war has fanally come(me)!

You all disagree with the war in Iraq after you learned that there weren't any WOMDs in Iraq. I'm going to have to provide a nice question for you.

You have something illegal in your home. The police, who suspect that you have it, keep saying they're going to come over and check your home for it if you don't turn it in.

Two months later, the come over. If you're smart, what are they going to find? Nothing.
_____________________

This is exactly what happened in Iraq. Hussein showed a small degree of common sense, and thought it might be a good idea to move his weapons.


What about those of us who accepted that he did have weapons he wasn't supposed to, and accepted that he was trying to dodge the sanctions and inspections as much as possible, but realised that THIS IS NATURALLY WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU IMPOSE SANCTIONS AND INSPECTIONS and didn't think the fact that he'd probably managed to hide a few things was a cause for war? Huh, Sparky, how about those who accepted that there were WMDs and still opposed the war?

I'll admit it, I thought there were still some chemical weapons and maybe some biological remnants. I knew that the 1990s inspections regime had been effective but I figured there had to be some stuff left. He bluffed me like he did everyone else including his own generals.

But I never accepted that any of this was a justifiable casus belli because I recognised that Iraq was extremely weak, that other states had far more weapons, that the invasion would be very destablising, and that everyone ws twisting things and making terribly facile arguments that didn't add up anywhere near enough to excuse an aggressive and politicised war of choice.

But hey, thanks for playing. Where did you come up with the notion that if there were WMD the war had to be ok? It's entirely possible to have accepted that there were weapons and violations of the inspection regime without it following that WAR MUST BE GOOD. Really, stick to the emotional blackmail, you can't win with facts and logic. I'll help, I suggest you squawk about the human rights argument, squeal about Nazis and appeasement and mass graves and OMFG EVIL and whathaveyou. You've heard it all before, now SPOUT IT!

Or if you must attempt to use facts and logic, at least use the one that might've been acceptable: the "correcting the mistakes of 1991 and recognising that our sanctions are killing people and making him stronger" argument that no-one seems to make because it requires both a nuanced grasp of history and an admission of fallability.


(edited by Arwon on 06-03-05 10:48 PM)
geeogree

Bloober
Level: 34

Posts: 363/448
EXP: 231583
For next: 22068

Since: 03-16-04
From: Calgary, Canada

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 11 hours
Posted on 06-12-05 02:23 AM Link | Quote
ziff: it is expensive to do.... but right now the price of oil is high enough to make it profitable.... not as much as pumping oil out of the middle east and transporting it places.... but it is still worth it....



if the war was for oil.... then why aren't prices going down? it's been a while... shouldn't the oil be here by now.... I for one would be pleased if the oil from Iraq came over here and helped push the price down.... I don't see why anyone here should care... it'll save you money....

isn't that what we all do.... abuse the 3rd world into making our lifestyle possible? directly or indirectly....
windwaker

Ball and Chain Trooper
WHY ALL THE MAYONNAISE HATE
Level: 61

Posts: 1648/1797
EXP: 1860597
For next: 15999

Since: 03-15-04

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 6 days
Posted on 06-12-05 04:08 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by geeogree
if the war was for oil.... then why aren't prices going down? it's been a while... shouldn't the oil be here by now.... I for one would be pleased if the oil from Iraq came over here and helped push the price down.... I don't see why anyone here should care... it'll save you money....


There's a thing called PEOPLE DYING, YOU FUCKING HEARTLESS BASTARD.
Legion
banning people for no reason sure is fun
Level: 101

Posts: 4327/5657
EXP: 10399737
For next: 317938

Since: 03-15-04
From: The Crossroads is under attack!

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 5 days
Posted on 06-12-05 04:35 AM Link | Quote
There's also a thing called an extremeist.

People die. It happens.
geeogree

Bloober
Level: 34

Posts: 364/448
EXP: 231583
For next: 22068

Since: 03-16-04
From: Calgary, Canada

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 11 hours
Posted on 06-12-05 07:01 AM Link | Quote
windwaker: I doubt the US military has killed more people in Iraq than Sadam did....
drjayphd

Beamos
What's that spell?




pimp!
Level: 56

Posts: 1084/1477
EXP: 1387410
For next: 10766

Since: 03-15-04
From: CT

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 06-12-05 01:20 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by geeogree
windwaker: I doubt the US military has killed more people in Iraq than Sadam did....


Ah yes, because we've only killed 80,000 (I don't know the exact figure and am certain it isn't THAT) to Saddam's 85,000 (and that number's gotta be higher), we're sparkling. There's realism, and there's douchebaggery.
Legion
banning people for no reason sure is fun
Level: 101

Posts: 4331/5657
EXP: 10399737
For next: 317938

Since: 03-15-04
From: The Crossroads is under attack!

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 5 days
Posted on 06-12-05 01:53 PM Link | Quote
Don't forget the Kurds drjay.
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 4071/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 06-12-05 10:43 PM Link | Quote
Well, Legion, he's probably including the Kurdish people.
Legion
banning people for no reason sure is fun
Level: 101

Posts: 4335/5657
EXP: 10399737
For next: 317938

Since: 03-15-04
From: The Crossroads is under attack!

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 5 days
Posted on 06-12-05 11:37 PM Link | Quote
In that case, the number is too low.
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 4072/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 06-13-05 01:54 AM Link | Quote
The highest number I've heard on killings is 295'000 by Saddam (extreme pro-war folk, ergo it's wrong). The highest number of killings by the States is 500'000 (extreme anti-war, ergo wrong). I'm going to say that the US, at this point is the in the range of 100'000 and Saddam killed 90'000. Contrary to popular beliefs the Hussein regime didn't have deaths squads massacring people every day. The attacks on the Kurds that are so flaunted have been joined in on by good ol' American allies and enemies alike. Primarily Turkey and Iran...Both of whom dislike the Kurdish people.
geeogree

Bloober
Level: 34

Posts: 365/448
EXP: 231583
For next: 22068

Since: 03-16-04
From: Calgary, Canada

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 11 hours
Posted on 06-13-05 06:48 AM Link | Quote
so you put Hussein's 20+ year dictatorship of Iraq at only about 90,000...

sounds horribly low to me...
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 4074/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 06-13-05 07:25 AM Link | Quote
Not really.

If you look at the culls of previous dictators, they're surprisingly low. Especially since Hussein's reign for the first 20 of those years was restricted by the US and the British so he would receive weapons while fighting Iran. 90'000 people is a ridiculously large number of people. Remember, even against the Kurds, he didn't really have any sort of implaced program of genocide. 90'000 is alot of people for 30 years of power. Especially when said dictator wasn't using an infrastructure geared towards extermination.
Legion
banning people for no reason sure is fun
Level: 101

Posts: 4338/5657
EXP: 10399737
For next: 317938

Since: 03-15-04
From: The Crossroads is under attack!

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 5 days
Posted on 06-13-05 08:34 AM Link | Quote
No matter how you try to justify it, and I really don't see why you are, a person like that is still horrible no matter how you slice it.
alte Hexe

Star Mario
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night
Alive as you and me
"But Joe you're ten years dead!"
"I never died" said he
"I never died!" said he
Level: 99

Posts: 4076/5458
EXP: 9854489
For next: 145511

Since: 03-15-04
From: ...

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 06-13-05 09:00 AM Link | Quote
I'm not justifying it.
geeogree

Bloober
Level: 34

Posts: 366/448
EXP: 231583
For next: 22068

Since: 03-16-04
From: Calgary, Canada

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 11 hours
Posted on 06-13-05 09:07 AM Link | Quote
nope... you are not..

but, you can't justify a war that took a person like that out of power either
drjayphd

Beamos
What's that spell?




pimp!
Level: 56

Posts: 1088/1477
EXP: 1387410
For next: 10766

Since: 03-15-04
From: CT

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
Posted on 06-13-05 11:17 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by geeogree
nope... you are not..

but, you can't justify a war that took a person like that out of power either


Are you saying what I think you mean?
Pages: 1 2 3 4Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - World Affairs / Debate - War in Iraq | |


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.013 seconds.