Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Hardware/Software - Benchmark Your PC
| User | Post |
Ran-chan
Posts: 6910/12781 |
Originally posted by Coby
All your questions are answered in the following images:
Benchmark score
Benchmark FPS
Overall PC
Graphics card
Moederbord means motherboard 
Anyway, yeah it's a nice machine,
seeing how I can run Doom 3 at max details at > 40 fps. 
Edit: No, this wasn't meant to be a bragging post
No wonder he got that high FPS. I mean, look at the graphics card.
Mine is still the second best in here. |
Acmlm
Posts: 1018/1173 |
My onboard video is comparable to what was good 4-5 years ago (but I got it 2 years ago, late 2002), it's better than the TNT2 M64 I had on the Pentium III 800MHz (late 2000), but slower than the Geforce2 MX100 on my grandparents' computer (early 2002) ... at least according to 3DMark2001 (scores at the lowest settings were around 2500, 1100, 3500 respectively) 
Considering the good video cards now are at least 20x faster than this (the 2 listed above were already on the low side for their time), there's definitely quite a jump between ...
And yeah ... "Extreme Graphics"? More like, "Extreme slowness" (at least it still looks fine) |
Colin
Posts: 6342/11302 |
Proof that onboard video, no matter HOW hyped it is by companies, is absolute crap.
By the time we get good onboard video comparable to today's decent graphics cards... I don't want to know how advanced graphics will be. |
Acmlm
Posts: 1017/1173 |
My onboard video would score a nice 2fps in those games at high quality (averaged 2.75 in Aquamark 3, it was so much of a bottleneck that the processor really didn't matter), apparently it'd be almost good enough to run them at the lowest settings ... but I'm not really into PC gaming, mostly playing on emulators and online games that have lower requirements, so I don't really mind
I'm going to get a whole new computer in almost a year, though, hopefully with a real video card
Originally posted by HyperHacker
I should try this with my 800mhz Celery and 4MB Intel Integrated Video.  Bet it crashes.
That or you'll be watching extremely slow animation for a few hours (no frame skip below 25fps) ... I doubt it'd even run, but at least you'd make my GFX score (282) not seem as low compared to everyone else's  |
Darth Coby
Posts: 1065/1371 |
Originally posted by BMF54123
Originally posted by Coby
GFX: 8,730
CPU: 9,955
TOTAL: 60,701
I got picture proof if required.
MY GOD, man! What kind of unholy beast are you running?
60,701...that's a solid 60fps, isn't it?
All your questions are answered in the following images:
Benchmark score
Benchmark FPS
Overall PC
Graphics card
Moederbord means motherboard
Anyway, yeah it's a nice machine,
seeing how I can run Doom 3 at max details at > 40 fps.
Edit: No, this wasn't meant to be a bragging post |
Ran-chan
Posts: 6893/12781 |
Anyway, here |
BMF98567
Posts: 598/1261 |
Originally posted by Trapster
I didn
Ran-chan
Posts: 6880/12781 |
Originally posted by BMF54123
MY GOD, man! What kind of unholy beast are you running?
60,701...that's a solid 60fps, isn't it?
I didn |
HyperLamer
Posts: 3020/8210 |
I should try this with my 800mhz Celery and 4MB Intel Integrated Video. Bet it crashes. |
BMF98567
Posts: 592/1261 |
Originally posted by Coby
GFX: 8,730
CPU: 9,955
TOTAL: 60,701
I got picture proof if required.
MY GOD, man! What kind of unholy beast are you running?
60,701...that's a solid 60fps, isn't it? |
Darth Coby
Posts: 1062/1371 |
GFX: 8,730
CPU: 9,955
TOTAL: 60,701
I got picture proof if required. |
Emptyeye
Posts: 1275/2273 |
I tried it, and got the "No graphics card detected" error, which if you ask me ranks up there with "keyboard not found. Press any key to continue." for stupid error messages.
Oh well.
EDIT: I have no idea what the hell "setupid" is. STUPID, on the other hand... |
Kwan
Posts: 1061/1137 |
Originally posted by BMF54123
I'm gathering from everyone else's results (mostly Dan's and Colin's) that my CPU is more than adequate, but my video card is proving to be a HUGE bottleneck, as it has the biggest impact on the final score. Is the FX 5500 really such a lousy card? 
*Grabs stuff from the log*
GFX score: 702
CPU score: 7160
AquaMark score: 6686
Seems like missing out on a video card when buying this new PC dragged it down a notch |
Ran-chan
Posts: 6809/12781 |
I have an ATI Radeon 9800 pro with an AMD Athlon 64 3000+. I think I |
BMF98567
Posts: 586/1261 |
I'm gathering from everyone else's results (mostly Dan's and Colin's) that my CPU is more than adequate, but my video card is proving to be a HUGE bottleneck, as it has the biggest impact on the final score. Is the FX 5500 really such a lousy card? |
Colin
Posts: 6292/11302 |
I used an ATI Radeon 9600 Pro with an Athlon XP 2500+ processor and my store cleaned Kwan's clock.  (I can't remember the video card hierarchy off the top of my head but I'll guess I won that battle.) |
windwaker
Posts: 1016/1797 |
Originally posted by Kwan
Hm
What are your CPU + Graphics Cards?
I have AMD Barton 3200+ with NVDIA Geforce FX 5200 128MB
I HAVE THE EXACT SAME THING, OMFG.
Serusly. |
Colin
Posts: 6290/11302 |
High detail settings, of course...
GFX: 3,468
CPU: 5,979
Total: 26,715
I'm quite satisfied.  Not that out of date YET. |
dan
Posts: 347/782 |
GFX score: 1902
CPU score: 4369
AquaMark score: 15630
Not too terrible. It sat at 5-6 fps for a few of the tests (the vegetation one), but it was usually around 20 fps a second. My brother managed a 53611 score with his newly upgraded PC. |
Acmlm
Posts: 1015/1173 |
I gave it a try, just to see how bad my onboard video really is compared to the rest of my still decent computer, and I'm not too surprised by the results
Specs:
Pentium IV 2.4GHz, 512MB RAM
onboard Intel 82845GL (it's slower than a Geforce2 MX100)
Result:
GFX: 282 (2.83fps render, 97% processing time)
CPU: 4428 (88.5fps simulation, 3%)
Score: 2745 (2.75fps total)
Average framerate per scene:
| 1- Dynamic occlusion culling | 3.25 | | 2- High particle count | 1.63 | | 3- Masked environment mapping | 3.16 | | 4- Large scale vegetation rendering | 2.09 | | 5- Large scale terrain rendering | 3.12 | | 6- Vertex and pixel lighting | 3.89 | | 7- 3D volumetric fog | 4.32 | | 8- Complex multimaterial shader | 2.74 | | 9- Massive overdraw | 1.99 |
The framerate ranged from about 0.9 to 6.0 fps, but generally stayed around 2-4 ... |
| This is a long thread. Click here to view it. | |
|
