Register | Login
Views: 19364387
Main | Memberlist | Active users | ACS | Commons | Calendar | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | Color Chart | Photo album | IRC Chat
11-02-05 12:59 PM
0 user currently in Programming. | 3 guests
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Programming - The "bordercolor" tag
  
User name:
Password:
Reply:
 

UserPost
Emptyeye
Posts: 787/2273
Ooh, onsite CSS. Neato.

ALSO: Damn, owned by proprietary code. Oh well.
Jesper
Posts: 629/2390
Originally posted by Disch
Come to think of it... can you even DO css stuff in layouts? Never bothered trying.
Here's the full HTML of my layout:
<div class="jesper-daring"><h3>jesper</h3><blockquote class="my"><h4>post &numposts&
Dish
Posts: 118/596
Bordercolor is not a real attribute. It's a browser added feature to perpetuate poor page code.

http://htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/tables/table.html <-- reference

You'll notice bordercolor isn't listed anywhere on there. If you decide to use it, expect random/different results on every browser.

Alternatively, you can use CSS to specify a border color for tables/images/etc... which is what I recommend, since it's way easy and looks the same in every browser.

Come to think of it... can you even DO css stuff in layouts? Never bothered trying.

*Disch shrugs
Emptyeye
Posts: 785/2273
Hmm. I'm on 0.9.3 right now...I'll have to tweak it some more.
DarkSlaya
Posts: 1428/4249
If I remember correctly, I saw on a chart and it said it was IE only. But "bordercolor" seems to work with Firefox 0.9x. A few IE-only tags were fixed in FF 0.9x (marquee, bordercoor, etc)
Emptyeye
Posts: 781/2273
The question in a nutshell: Is this an IE-only tag? I noted that the energy bars in my sig look rather dumb with a white border around them, which is how it renders in Firefox (I'm on a new computer). So I took out the border=1 tags and have what you see now. WITH those tags, it looks fine in IE.
Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Programming - The "bordercolor" tag


ABII


AcmlmBoard vl.ol (11-01-05)
© 2000-2005 Acmlm, Emuz, et al



Page rendered in 0.002 seconds.