| User | Post |
Arwon
Posts: 360/506 |
Freedom omlettes! |
MathOnNapkins
Posts: 2052/2189 |
Originally posted by Arwon
You can't make an omlette without killing a few people.
what kind of omettes do YOU make? :\ |
Arwon
Posts: 359/506 |
You can't make an omlette without killing a few people. |
thetallness
Posts: 53/57 |
Originally posted by Kefka
Why do we have so many nuke bombs if we are never going to use them? Geez, man. We should quit worrying about how to disarm ourselves and the rest of the world. Get rid of those nukes the EASY way! Make the entire country of Iraq our official test site/ garbage can for nuclear bombs! THAT's a solution that works! They can have all of our nukes that they want, those little motherfuckers! I hope they all go to hell. Every one of them. What they did to jeopardize our American freedom is intolerable, and we all know THEY tried to take out London too, not that stupidass Al Qaeda group. Bomb them, I say. BOMB
Well... Mr. Monday's stupidity distracted us from this... Though part of me would like to see this happen, frankly, it's inhumane. You'd be killing a lot of innocents.
And Mr. Monday, you really ought to know what you're talking about before babbling off like you do. But no. You'd rather learn the hard way. Nah. You're skull is way too thick to open up to people who have a basis on which they're arguments lie. Sad. |
Legion
Posts: 4691/5657 |
God fucking damn it, Ziff and Arwon already beat me to it.
FUCK! I was going to have some fun with it too. 
Mr. Monday, please, it's "Saddam". |
Arwon
Posts: 358/506 |
Originally posted by Mr. Monday
You overlook the true facts with Iraq. Just because we havn't specificaly found nukes, dosn't meen we havn't found anything else. WE've found hidden planes, mass piles of guns, and other high powered weapons which had been hidden. If Iraq had nothing to hide they wouldn't have tried 4 so long. Sadame frequetly telling inspectors that they could inspect places, but they had to wait till tommorow every time they checked anywhere implies the bastard was hiding something.
So what you're saying is that they dared to have... a military?
Well holy pre-emptive strike, Batman! |
Kefka
Posts: 3257/3392 |
Why do we have so many nuke bombs if we are never going to use them? Geez, man. We should quit worrying about how to disarm ourselves and the rest of the world. Get rid of those nukes the EASY way! Make the entire country of Iraq our official test site/ garbage can for nuclear bombs! THAT's a solution that works! They can have all of our nukes that they want, those little motherfuckers! I hope they all go to hell. Every one of them. What they did to jeopardize our American freedom is intolerable, and we all know THEY tried to take out London too, not that stupidass Al Qaeda group. Bomb them, I say. BOMB |
alte Hexe
Posts: 4581/5458 |
Oh, no!
Not guns and PLANES!
Dastardly Iraqis and their attempts to gain technology held by the rest of the world for more than a century :o |
Mr. Monday
Posts: 2/5 |
You overlook the true facts with Iraq. Just because we havn't specificaly found nukes, dosn't meen we havn't found anything else. WE've found hidden planes, mass piles of guns, and other high powered weapons which had been hidden. If Iraq had nothing to hide they wouldn't have tried 4 so long. Sadame frequetly telling inspectors that they could inspect places, but they had to wait till tommorow every time they checked anywhere implies the bastard was hiding something. |
Dei*
Posts: 129/412 |
Wow, amazing how that quote was not even paid attention to by his son, huh? :p
Makes me wonder if G.B. tried to tell him invading Iraq was a bad idea. |
alte Hexe
Posts: 4297/5458 |
"To occupy Iraq would instantly shatter our coalition, turning the whole Arab world against us and make a broken tyrant into a latter-day hero ... assigning young soldiers to a fruitless hunt for a securely entrenched dictator and condemning them to fight in what would be an un-winnable urban guerilla war. It could only plunge that part of the world into even greater instability."
George Bush, Sr.
I love that quote. |
Dei*
Posts: 124/412 |
Bush has no time left on the clock to go after Iran, so if anything the administration will just talk smack about them for a few years.
Luckily he doesn't. We're already knee-deep in shite as it is with Iraq. |
Colin
Posts: 8947/11302 |
Bush has no time left on the clock to go after Iran, so if anything the administration will just talk smack about them for a few years.
Mr Ahmadinejad appeared to rule out improving ties with Washington, saying Iran did not really need the US.
So he's an isolationist basically. *shrug* Wouldn't have been my first choice to take over Iran and he might set them back 20 years if he starts getting rid of reforms, but he's who the people - supposingly - voted for. |
Apophis
Posts: 581/882 |
I wonder how long it will be until Bush declares war on Iran. After all, nuclear weapons are
'Weapons of Mass Destruction.' |
Kaioshin
Posts: 16/45 |
I agree. They should be allowed to do whatever they want. As long as they don't start bombing other countries, that is.
Most of the world is paranoid when it comes to nuclear stuff, I gather. |
Dei*
Posts: 95/412 |
Originally posted by Ziff
ono not nuclear energy for a growing nation!
As long as it adheres to EU sanction rules, I see no problem letting them into the nuclear power club.
Honestly me neither, but Bush is like "zomg nuclear power they MUST want to make american-killing nukes lol" |
alte Hexe
Posts: 4283/5458 |
ono not nuclear energy for a growing nation!
As long as it adheres to EU sanction rules, I see no problem letting them into the nuclear power club. |
Dei*
Posts: 91/412 |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4624193.stm
"Iran's newly elected hardline President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has said his government will continue the country's nuclear programme."
What can I say, I totally expected this, especially since the counsil or whatever it was called controlled who entered the elections and who didn't. |
