| User | Post |
Slay
Posts: 31/339 |
I'm not a big fan of the NWO, mainly because ever since Hogan went Hollywood, he's been a total a-hole. I'm more of a Wolf Pac supporter, though I think Sting should stay solo. It was cool when he joined up with them for awhile and changed his facepaint to red, but he seems more like a loner than a group-oriented wrestler. |
Sandy53215
Posts: 467/948 |
Completely against it...
Main reason: Against my religion. |
Dracoon
Posts: 2880/3727 |
I think he is talking about how all the different types of Christainty would be forced together. |
MathOnNapkins
Posts: 1784/2189 |
Originally posted by cds113089
One-world government leads to a one-world religion, which would be a disaster for Christians.
Maybe you could elaborate? This statement doesn't make any sense. In fact it sounds more like paranoia to me than anything. While government can tend to normalize people's religion, it is not always the case. Do you really have that little faith in the Christian faith to think it would be overrun by something like government? It survived the periods of Roman persecution, right? |
cds113089
Posts: 33/46 |
One-world government leads to a one-world religion, which would be a disaster for Christians. |
alte Hexe
Posts: 3654/5458 |
Because the Security Council is currently being reformed. You'll see a shift in how that works soon enough.
As for India over France. Up until the past 5 years, India was an inconsequential nation. As wrong as it sounds who would've sponsored them? America, Britain...? Within the closing of the decade the Security Council will have changed to allow for at least half a dozen more countries that are growing military and economic powers. |
||bass
Posts: 322/817 |
I've never been the biggest fan of the U.N.
It gives disproportionate representation.
Tell me how France can veto and India can't? |
alte Hexe
Posts: 3647/5458 |
I'm sorry, I re-read that. And the minute it started attacking the UN it lost all effective interest and credibility in my eyes. |
Gavin
Posts: 643/799 |
it sounds like some people are confusing the NWO with PNAC  |
alte Hexe
Posts: 3644/5458 |
I just think that the whole thing is a bunch of bunk. People make up these little fronts and conspiracies all the time.
This one sounds decent, as far as they go. But there are about 100'000 waiting for you at any UFO website.
||bass, I totally agree with you. Multiple party democracy is the way to go. PR for life! |
hhallahh
Posts: 542/607 |
Did anyone actually look at the article? Apparently the NWO is about "placing priority upon the rights of citizens over the rights of governments. The citizens own and control their government. Regional integration is accomplished on a gradual and voluntary basis. Neither individual slavery nor collective slavery are allowed."
You people are against that?
|
||bass
Posts: 321/817 |
See, it's thinking like this that that proves we seriously need a strong 3rd party in the US. |
alte Hexe
Posts: 3639/5458 |
Originally posted by ||bass
These poll choices are horrible....
You're totally biforcating the issue here.....
There are more options then 100% yes, 100% no, don't know, and don't understand.
Life is more complicated then right and left.
But that is the point of the NWO. According to all the theories about it, it is a paradigm shift from the grey that we live in now to absolute black and white, left and right. So, given the ideas presented in the ideas of the NWO, the poll choices may be lacking, but are widely correct...If not a little humorous. |
||bass
Posts: 319/817 |
These poll choices are horrible....
You're totally biforcating the issue here.....
There are more options then 100% yes, 100% no, don't know, and don't understand.
Life is more complicated then right and left. |
The SomerZ
Posts: 690/862 |
It's about a change of paradigms. How can you be against a change of paradigms? Paradigm changes happen, but, as Kuhn expained, none of them are more "right" than the others. |
Kefka
Posts: 2620/3392 |
Site containing the general definition of New World Order
If you use Google, there are a ton of sites talking about conspiracies and such, but the site provided gives a pretty good definition.
The New World Order thing will probably be continually (and subtly) pushed by the Republicans for many years to come, and I want to know your thoughts on it, and whether you support it. |
