Acmlm's Board - I2 Archive - Programming - XD!!!! WebLock Pro!!
| User | Post |
Rydain
Posts: 488/738 |
That looks a lot like the source of some spam page I came across a long time ago. I don't think View Selection Source was available then (or I would have used it), but I was able to get the code by decoding the stuff within eval() and replacing the call to document.write with an alert. It's funny...that guy probably spent hours writing all that obfuscated JavaScript, and it's now even more pointless thanks to modern browsers' features...  |
HyperLamer
Posts: 3446/8210 |
Haha, I love these. Always good for a laugh. Lesee...
"Try to view the source"
*Clicks View -> Page Source* Rofl, they just stuck it halfway down and halfway across a huge bunch of spaces and used one of those lame JS encryptions. ANY of those can be defeated in about 3 minutes. Copy and paste it, and modify it to print to a textbox instead of document.write. 
"Try to right click"
Only worked because of the encrypted script. I oughta get an extension for it instead of relying on HTML filtering, but what the hell, I can do anything I could do with right-clicking with the main menu anyway.
"Try to select text"
Hah, nice. It de-selects if you click and drag, but not if you hit Ctrl+A.
"Try to see the URL"
Done. Next!
"Try to print"
Don't wanna waste the paper, but Print Preview works. Doesn't hurt that I blocked all JS printing-related functions. (Some weird-ass page had a print prompt popping up when you viewed it.  )
"Try to save a copy"
Not even gonna bother thinking of a sarcastic way of saying I encountered no trouble doing so.
"Try to take a screen shot"
Should I save that as JPG or PNG? Hell, who am I kidding, that's nowhere near worth saving. *closes MSPaint*
I always like emailing these guys their own decrypted source codes, but if it hasn't even been updated in 3 years, there's not much point. People don't seem to understand the fact that HTML must be decrypted to plain text, and browsers act the same whether you're viewing the page, saving a copy, or using the little-known view-source:// protocol. Trying to write closed-source HTML is like giving someone a password written in plain text on a piece of paper and trying to convince them they can't read it. (Sure, some of this stuff might work in IE, but you shouldn't be using that for the web anyway. ) |
drjayphd
Posts: 893/1477 |
And yes, I did send that email. They never responded, much to my dismay.
Well, considering their SITE, I'd be amazed if they even knew what they were doing...
Oh, and it seems PicKeeper "is now a FREEWARE". They're new at this, aren't they?
(The point of this exercise: If you can't spell or get a handle on grammar on your site, why the hell would I buy ANYTHING from you?) |
Boom.dk
Posts: 275/392 |
Originally posted by FreeDOS
You're not for using FrontPage 
Really? No! It just comes in handy when you need to fix table drawing, deviding and such. |
Vystrix Nexoth
Posts: 273/348 |
Or, in Firefox/Mozilla, open the DOM Inspector, right-click on the <html> node and select "Copy XML". Paste into your favorite text editor. This works around javascript because the DOM inspector shows you what the browser is seeing (which includes any document.write()s Javascript may have done)... no matter how convoluted the javascript/encryption may be, ultimately it has to write straight HTML into the document, and the DOM inspector will pick that up.
For that one that requires you to download a stand-alone browser specially tailored to the website (which, quite frankly, is cheating), just download the browser, open in a hex editor and look for the relevant cookie setting; the password is in plaintext. Use a cookie editor for your browser, set it, and away you go.
Only someone who doesn't understand web design would fall for these useless tricks. Little wonder these sites have been dead for a few years. 
For the WebLockPro thing, notice how the testimonials section has links to sites that use it... so far, every single one of them is either off the web, or no longer uses weblock pro. |
FreeDOS
Posts: 1177/1657 |
Originally posted by Kieran
Stealing that code is easy! Ctrl+A in firefox, paste in Frontpage and press the html tab. Dang I'm good!
You're not for using FrontPage
Just do the Ctrl-A thing then right-click -> View Selection Source (oh, should I mention right-click blocking doesn't work if you don't want it to?). Firefox's Selection Source parses JavaScript before showing you the source... doing it the normal way doesn't. |
Parasyte
Posts: 320/514 |
We discussed these things in #rom-hacking a few weeks ago. The first one brought up (that I noticed -- a little late, even) was pickeeper. The conversation went something like this:
[08:05.53 PM] <@Parasyte`> [07:36.27 PM] <@bbitmaster> woah, who do these guys think they are fooling?
[08:05.53 PM] <@Parasyte`> [07:36.28 PM] <@bbitmaster> http://pickeeper.com/
[08:05.56 PM] <@Parasyte`> ^ LOLOLOLOL
[08:06.06 PM] <@Parasyte`> LOLOLOLOLOLOL --> http://parasyte.panicus.org/stuff/pickeeper.png*
[08:08.01 PM] <@bbitmaster> lol, what did you do para?
[08:12.08 PM] <@Parasyte`> bbitmaster, I just added the cookie shown in anEC
[08:12.33 PM] <@Parasyte`> Fuck, that was a difficult program to "hack"
[08:12.37 PM] <@Parasyte`> baaaaaaaaahhhahah
[08:13.25 PM] <@Parasyte`> These people deserve death. I'm going to email them and ask what I've won, "aside from a cookie containing valid=16897425"
[08:13.48 PM] <@DD[Hacking]> cookies?
[08:13.53 PM] <@DD[Hacking]> they use cookies for this?
[08:13.57 PM] <@Parasyte`> Yes.
[08:14.00 PM] <@DD[Hacking]> dude
[08:14.00 PM] <@DD[Hacking]> wtf
[08:14.05 PM] <@DD[Hacking]> any browser can disable cookies
[08:14.14 PM] <@DD[Hacking]> er wait that wouldn't work
[08:14.20 PM] <@DD[Hacking]> you must have cookies enabled
[08:14.34 PM] <@DD[Hacking]> but still
[08:14.42 PM] <@DD[Hacking]> anybody who has half a brain can set a cookie
[08:15.24 PM] <@Parasyte`> Yes.
[08:15.49 PM] <@Parasyte`> Andone with that same half of a brain can also open "pk.exe" in a hex editor and search for the string "valid"
[08:16.00 PM] <@Parasyte`> Hmm, Anyone <--
[08:16.45 PM] <@Vystrix_Nexoth> Parasyte`: where'd you get that anEC cookie extension?
[08:16.49 PM] <@Parasyte`> I was planning to just dump the network traffic the program sent, but I could not actually get the piece of shit software to run reliably.
[08:16.58 PM] <@Parasyte`> Mozilla.com 
[08:17.07 PM] <@Parasyte`> It's a nice extension.
[08:17.16 PM] <@Parasyte`> So is the Web Developer extension.
[08:17.23 PM] <@bbitmaster> lol para... that's funny
[08:17.24 PM] <@Parasyte`> Realtime CSS editing and such :OOO
[08:17.30 PM] * @Vystrix_Nexoth searched for it (on mozilla.org and the entire WWW) and did not find it
[08:19.07 PM] <@Parasyte`> VN:: http://addneditcookies.mozdev.org/
[08:19.37 PM] <@bbitmaster> I'm ancient... still using firefox 0.9.1
[08:19.37 PM] <@Vystrix_Nexoth> oh, it's called "add & edit cookies"
[08:19.52 PM] <@Vystrix_Nexoth> I searched for "anEC cookie editor" (with quotes) and got exactly zero hits on google.
[08:20.01 PM] <@Vystrix_Nexoth> and "anec" by itself seems to be an acronym for some other thing.
[08:20.02 PM] <@Parasyte`> Aye, anEC = Add n Edit Cookies
And yes, I did send that email. They never responded, much to my dismay.
Then we went on to discuss weblock-pro and such. (Most of us had a good time laughing at their client list; sites which either do not exist, or do not use thier product.)
*Image filename in the actual log is "pickeeper-sucks.png" -- I changed the name when I sent the link to them. Hopefully the lack of the word "sucks" in the filename tempted them to actually look at it. (OK, maybe not, but it's more likely they would have avoided it if it were included!) I intended to embarrass them out of busines, but I can't say that will actually happen. |
neotransotaku
Posts: 2429/4016 |
I believe it is webpages that suck?
WPTS |
Darth Coby
Posts: 1122/1371 |
His protection is a joke. Seriously.
What's WPTS? |
Boom.dk
Posts: 274/392 |
Stealing that code is easy! Ctrl+A in firefox, paste in Frontpage and press the html tab. Dang I'm good! |
Xkeeper
Posts: -2440/-863 |
Try visiting anything (Affiliates or Support(More Info)) -- they're all web tools that you CANT LIVE WITHOUT and will SAVE YOU $1,000S OF MONEY!1!!!!1
I submitted that to WPTS, because if JS is off, it goes boom. |
neotransotaku
Posts: 2425/4016 |
heh...it explains why the page hasnt been updated in over 3 years |
FreeDOS
Posts: 1172/1657 |
http://www.weblockpro.com/home.php
It claims to protect Web page source code. haha. For kicks, I sent him an email with the following link:
http://mike.warpedbelief.com/weblock-pro/ |
|
