Points of Required Attention™
Smaghetti, a new Super Mario Advance 4 editor, is currently in development! Check out the thread HERE!

Please chime in on a proposed restructuring of the ROM hacking sections.
Views: 88,319,228
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search 03-29-24 12:35 PM
Guest: Register | Login

0 users currently in The Landfill | 2 guests | 1 bot

Main - The Landfill - Animal Sex New thread | Thread closed

Pages: 1 2 3

optomon
Posted on 12-04-08 01:06 PM Link | Quote | ID: 95654


Leever
Level: 33

Posts: 143/198
EXP: 219983
Next: 9196

Since: 03-05-07
From: Vancouver, WA

Last post: 2429 days
Last view: 2017 days
Posted by Marzen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWPfhpHCLDM&feature=related

I have nothing more to say on the subject.


That's genuinely disturbing.

I think it highlights one of the big problems people have with people having sex with animals (especially men, don't know about women). There's this notion that it's predatory and coercive, like pedophelia. And they may as well be correct, because it doesn't seem likely to prove otherwise.

Other than that I don't see any problem whatsoever with animal sex.

Dr. Hell
Posted on 12-04-08 03:06 PM Link | Quote | ID: 95663


Lakitu
Level: 52

Posts: 412/552
EXP: 1024193
Next: 59647

Since: 03-02-07
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Last post: 5006 days
Last view: 4963 days
Posted by optomon
Other than that I don't see any problem whatsoever with animal sex.


I knew it...

optomon
Posted on 12-04-08 06:04 PM Link | Quote | ID: 95667


Leever
Level: 33

Posts: 144/198
EXP: 219983
Next: 9196

Since: 03-05-07
From: Vancouver, WA

Last post: 2429 days
Last view: 2017 days
I don't have any problem with HARDCORE GAY SEX either Dr. Hell. We should DO IT sometime.

MathOnNapkins
Posted on 12-04-08 06:41 PM Link | Quote | ID: 95671


Super Koopa
Level: 62

Posts: 566/842
EXP: 1931203
Next: 53483

Since: 02-19-07
From: durff

Last post: 4460 days
Last view: 3983 days
http://forum.ebaumsworld.com/showthread.php?p=4515844

and there you have it, interspecies fucking is totally natural.

____________________
Zelda Hacking Forum
hobbies: delectatio morosa

Lenina
Posted on 12-04-08 08:24 PM Link | Quote | ID: 95676


Paragoomba

Level: 20

Posts: 12/67
EXP: 41080
Next: 1359

Since: 11-17-08

Last post: 5550 days
Last view: 5547 days
Posted by blackhole89
Posted by Lenina
I just need to know what is common practice before I support or condone something.

So you mean your opinion on something is based on others' opinion of it?

What a weak notion of morality.


I'm not basing it on someone's opinion. I'm basing my opinion on what is actually done by those participating. I don't want to assume what is done.

It's like the midget tossing that was banned here in the US. People thought, "Oh no! We can't allow midget tossing! It's degrading to the midgets!" When in reality the midgets who did it, were happy and not feeling used. They earned over $500 for one hour of work.

You need to know the FACTS before you DECIDE.

Kawa
Posted on 12-04-08 08:54 PM Link | Quote | ID: 95677


CHIKKN NI A BAAZZKIT!!!
80's Cheerilee is best pony
Level: 138

Posts: 1390/5344
EXP: 30876021
Next: 786960

Since: 02-20-07
From: The Netherlands

Last post: 4470 days
Last view: 2605 days
Posted by Kawa
as long as you don't hurt the animal in question (and yourself too, ofcourse)
Cruelty, CKY? What if the sheep like it?

____________________
Wife make lunch - Shampoo
Opera - give it a spin
Spare some of your free time?
<GreyMaria> I walked around the Lake so many goddamn times that my sex drive was brutally murdered
Kawa rocks — byuu

Trax
Posted on 12-04-08 11:03 PM Link | Quote | ID: 95713


Yellow Stalfos
Level: 71

Posts: 666/1145
EXP: 3028893
Next: 138221

Since: 07-06-07
From: Québec

Last post: 3599 days
Last view: 2851 days
Since animal communication is not understood as well as human communication, there's noone who can judge perfectly how the animal feels about it, so... Which side gets the benefit of the doubt?

Flan
Posted on 12-05-08 09:58 AM Link | Quote | ID: 95792


Level: 82

Posts: 1131/1610
EXP: 5106438
Next: 102789

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 3576 days
Last view: 4566 days
Posted by Lenina
Posted by blackhole89
Posted by Lenina
I just need to know what is common practice before I support or condone something.

So you mean your opinion on something is based on others' opinion of it?

What a weak notion of morality.


I'm not basing it on someone's opinion. I'm basing my opinion on what is actually done by those participating. I don't want to assume what is done.

It's like the midget tossing that was banned here in the US. People thought, "Oh no! We can't allow midget tossing! It's degrading to the midgets!" When in reality the midgets who did it, were happy and not feeling used. They earned over $500 for one hour of work.

You need to know the FACTS before you DECIDE.

Nobody tosses a dwarf!

Mr. Weegee
Posted on 12-06-08 09:23 PM Link | Quote | ID: 95996


Red Paragoomba
Level: 19

Posts: 15/59
EXP: 33890
Next: 1887

Since: 12-05-08
From: Pluto

Last post: 5453 days
Last view: 5023 days
It's creepy.
And illegal.
Don't support it...
It's just wrong...


____________________

Please excuse my n00bish past.


Xeruss
Posted on 12-06-08 09:45 PM Link | Quote | ID: 96003


Sledge Brother
Compromised account.
Level: 86

Posts: 631/1815
EXP: 6112151
Next: 29956

Since: 02-19-07
From: Oregon

Last post: 1785 days
Last view: 1784 days
Posted by Mr. Weegee
It's creepy.
And illegal.
Don't support it...
It's just wrong...



Maybe it's illegal where you live, but it isn't everywhere. Hell, even in the U.S. it's allowed depending what state you live in.

The only real reason a person would be opposed to it is either on moral grounds, personal distaste, or they're screwing your pet. Seeing as the distribution of pornography containing animals is illegal in most places, there's really no way you'll wind up exposed toward such material unless you're looking for it.

And just because you disapprove of it on a moral basis, doesn't mean you should interfere with those who like things as they are... As long as it isn't your pet.

You'll need more to be more convincing than a few sentences and ideas with no explained reasoning behind them if you hope to sway a person's opinion.

____________________
Design © 2009 Stark
Once for the Super Dave TV show I was the stuntman that fell down the entire wtc stairwell. ~ jargon

Mr. Weegee
Posted on 12-08-08 12:34 AM Link | Quote | ID: 96106


Red Paragoomba
Level: 19

Posts: 17/59
EXP: 33890
Next: 1887

Since: 12-05-08
From: Pluto

Last post: 5453 days
Last view: 5023 days
Posted by Xeruss
You'll need more to be more convincing than a few sentences and ideas with no explained reasoning behind them if you hope to sway a person's opinion.

True...
Sorry about my pointless post.
It is frowned upon in most places.
Not all...
Where I live it is.

____________________

Please excuse my n00bish past.


Ailure
Posted on 12-10-08 02:42 AM Link | Quote | ID: 96334

Hats
Steam Board2 group
Level: 121

Posts: 3178/3965
EXP: 19735118
Next: 321578

Since: 02-19-07
From: Sweden, Skåne

Last post: 3273 days
Last view: 2024 days
As long none get's hurt over it, I don't see the big deal with people doing it.

Furry jokes aside, I personally wouldn't like to copulate with anything that have less than 50 IQ.

____________________
AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org


Zaximillian
Posted on 12-10-08 01:37 PM Link | Quote | ID: 96372


Red Paragoomba
Level: 19

Posts: 9/59
EXP: 33988
Next: 1789

Since: 11-03-08
From: Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Last post: 5012 days
Last view: 4362 days
For me, sex with animals, at any time and for any reason, is out. I believe that since animals cannot grant their consent and since our interspecies communication skills are limited to "Speak, boy!", it's not possible to know for sure whether that copulation is even pleasurable for the animal. And no, ejaculation is not proof. I also think that animal sex is for that reason alone immoral, not to mention the far more damaging potentials for spread of cross-species diseases, dehumanization of the self, injury or death (by horse, for example).

So to sum up, I think that animal sex is immoral and dangerous. Whether it affects negatively socially, spiritually, mentally or physically depends on the circumstance. I can't see any long term good in it, and the short term good is at best debatable.

So no. When bumping uglies, stick to your own species. Leave the "wild side" to fantasy and fetish where it belongs, and if that fetish is hard wired, have your SO rent a costume. If they're willing to do that to make you pop, marry 'em.

____________________
For FOOOOOOD!

knuck
Posted on 12-10-08 01:48 PM Link | Quote | ID: 96373


Spiny
Level: 53

Posts: 494/586
EXP: 1107517
Next: 49602

Since: 07-22-07
From: BR

Last post: 4608 days
Last view: 4457 days
Posted by Zaximillian
For me, sex with animals, at any time and for any reason, is out. I believe that since animals cannot grant their consent and since our interspecies communication skills are limited to "Speak, boy!", it's not possible to know for sure whether that copulation is even pleasurable for the animal. And no, ejaculation is not proof. I also think that animal sex is for that reason alone immoral, not to mention the far more damaging potentials for spread of cross-species diseases, dehumanization of the self, injury or death (by horse, for example).

So to sum up, I think that animal sex is immoral and dangerous. Whether it affects negatively socially, spiritually, mentally or physically depends on the circumstance. I can't see any long term good in it, and the short term good is at best debatable.

So no. When bumping uglies, stick to your own species. Leave the "wild side" to fantasy and fetish where it belongs, and if that fetish is hard wired, have your SO rent a costume. If they're willing to do that to make you pop, marry 'em.
stfu christian

Zaximillian
Posted on 12-10-08 02:07 PM Link | Quote | ID: 96374


Red Paragoomba
Level: 19

Posts: 10/59
EXP: 33988
Next: 1789

Since: 11-03-08
From: Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Last post: 5012 days
Last view: 4362 days
Posted by knuck
stfu christian


Dang, is my crucifix showing again? I thought my werewolf blood ruined that thing.

First, if you can't tell the difference between morality and religion, you got issues, knuck. You can definitely have one without the other. Works both ways, and both have drawbacks.

____________________
For FOOOOOOD!

knuck
Posted on 12-10-08 02:26 PM Link | Quote | ID: 96375


Spiny
Level: 53

Posts: 495/586
EXP: 1107517
Next: 49602

Since: 07-22-07
From: BR

Last post: 4608 days
Last view: 4457 days
Because two thousand years of jesus in no way influenced the morals of western society.

Zaximillian
Posted on 12-10-08 02:48 PM Link | Quote | ID: 96377


Red Paragoomba
Level: 19

Posts: 12/59
EXP: 33988
Next: 1789

Since: 11-03-08
From: Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Last post: 5012 days
Last view: 4362 days
Posted by knuck
Because two thousand years of jesus in no way influenced the morals of western society.


Do you mean that the presence of Christianity did not affect the morals of the Western World? I totally disagree. For example, the role of knights in feudalism were codified by the church. Without the church's influence, these men would have remained barbarians plaguing the countryside.

What I think you mean is that the past two thousand years of Christianity have not *improved* the morality of Western society. Even then, that's one heck of a lot of ground, billions of people, and two millenia to make that claim on. All anyone needs to do is to find one exception to "in no way", and thus defeat your proposition.

But to get back on subject, I maintain that animal sex is immoral and dangerous. Leave the Christian-bashing to the prideful humanists and the animal rutting to the sex crazed freaks.

____________________
For FOOOOOOD!

knuck
Posted on 12-10-08 03:18 PM Link | Quote | ID: 96379


Spiny
Level: 53

Posts: 496/586
EXP: 1107517
Next: 49602

Since: 07-22-07
From: BR

Last post: 4608 days
Last view: 4457 days
Posted by Zaximillian
Do you mean that the presence of Christianity did not affect the morals of the Western World? I totally disagree. For example, the role of knights in feudalism were codified by the church. Without the church's influence, these men would have remained barbarians plaguing the countryside.

What I think you mean is that the past two thousand years of Christianity have not *improved* the morality of Western society. Even then, that's one heck of a lot of ground, billions of people, and two millenia to make that claim on. All anyone needs to do is to find one exception to "in no way", and thus defeat your proposition.

Zaximillian
Posted on 12-10-08 03:31 PM Link | Quote | ID: 96382


Red Paragoomba
Level: 19

Posts: 13/59
EXP: 33988
Next: 1789

Since: 11-03-08
From: Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Last post: 5012 days
Last view: 4362 days
Sorry, knuck. Mistook you for a troll. My bad!

____________________
For FOOOOOOD!

CKY-9K
Posted on 12-10-08 06:32 PM Link | Quote | ID: 96393


Pokey
Level: 57

Posts: 519/693
EXP: 1427221
Next: 58707

Since: 06-27-07
From: cKy

Last post: 182 days
Last view: 90 days
It doesn't deal with christianity, it's wrong by nature.

It's as wrong as sex with kids imo.

____________________







Pages: 1 2 3


Main - The Landfill - Animal Sex New thread | Thread closed

Acmlmboard 2.1+4δ (2023-01-15)
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al.

Page rendered in 0.029 seconds. (322KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 117, rows: 146/146, time: 0.018 seconds.