Points of Required Attention™
Smaghetti, a new Super Mario Advance 4 editor, is currently in development! Check out the thread HERE!

Please chime in on a proposed restructuring of the ROM hacking sections.
Views: 88,319,411
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search 03-29-24 12:53 PM
Guest: Register | Login

0 users currently in ROM Hacking | 5 guests | 2 bots

Main - ROM Hacking - Hi,everybody,HappyLee's here! New thread | New reply

Pages: 1 2

3.14+
Posted on 10-22-08 10:39 AM Link | Quote | ID: 92675


Goomba
Level: 13

Posts: 10/22
EXP: 8051
Next: 2216

Since: 07-29-07
From: China

Last post: 5626 days
Last view: 5626 days
Posted by blackhole89
Oh, hello 3.14+! Long time no see. :o

What's with the sudden influx of Chinese users, anyway? Did the Great Firewall stop blocking this server?


Actually, Acmlm's Board was never banned by firewall. It's only that I have exited SMW Hacking and I forgot here , but recently someone reminded me about Acmlm, so I paid a visit.

And the Chinese users here are all from Baidu Post, they are not random users, some of them are even experienced ROM hackers. Meanwhile some of them may be too excited and forget the rules here, so please give them a break

____________________
Busy with chem and osu!

blackhole89
Posted on 10-22-08 11:00 AM Link | Quote | ID: 92676


The Guardian
Moloch whose eyes are a thousand blind windows!
Level: 124

Posts: 2007/4196
EXP: 21485069
Next: 351532

Since: 02-19-07
From: Ithaca, NY, US

Last post: 443 days
Last view: 56 days



I remember running one of those online "Find out if your site is blocked in China" checks (quite) a while back and finding that all sites hosted on my server were consequently being blocked...

I think it was general consensus among the staff - those I asked, at least - to not take any steps in response to the "rule forgetfulness inflicting excitement" as long as the rule-forgetting stays in this thread and doesn't manifest in the form of, say, bumps all over the place.

____________________



3.14+
Posted on 10-22-08 04:11 PM Link | Quote | ID: 92681


Goomba
Level: 13

Posts: 15/22
EXP: 8051
Next: 2216

Since: 07-29-07
From: China

Last post: 5626 days
Last view: 5626 days
Posted by blackhole89

I think it was general consensus among the staff - those I asked, at least - to not take any steps in response to the "rule forgetfulness inflicting excitement" as long as the rule-forgetting stays in this thread and doesn't manifest in the form of, say, bumps all over the place.


They have common sense that bumping threads is against the rule

____________________
Busy with chem and osu!

blackhole89
Posted on 10-22-08 08:50 PM Link | Quote | ID: 92689


The Guardian
Moloch whose eyes are a thousand blind windows!
Level: 124

Posts: 2008/4196
EXP: 21485069
Next: 351532

Since: 02-19-07
From: Ithaca, NY, US

Last post: 443 days
Last view: 56 days



Posted by 3.14+
Posted by blackhole89

I think it was general consensus among the staff - those I asked, at least - to not take any steps in response to the "rule forgetfulness inflicting excitement" as long as the rule-forgetting stays in this thread and doesn't manifest in the form of, say, bumps all over the place.


They have common sense that bumping threads is against the rule

The irony. It burns.

____________________



3.14+
Posted on 10-23-08 11:45 AM Link | Quote | ID: 92708


Goomba
Level: 13

Posts: 16/22
EXP: 8051
Next: 2216

Since: 07-29-07
From: China

Last post: 5626 days
Last view: 5626 days
Posted by blackhole89

The irony. It burns.


Maybe I didn't check out the last reply date. However, since that forum has got too few threads in it, it doesn't matter a lot if I "bump" a thread in the first page.

____________________
Busy with chem and osu!
Pages: 1 2


Main - ROM Hacking - Hi,everybody,HappyLee's here! New thread | New reply

Acmlmboard 2.1+4δ (2023-01-15)
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al.

Page rendered in 0.021 seconds. (340KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 47, rows: 72/72, time: 0.016 seconds.