Points of Required Attention™
Please chime in on a proposed restructuring of the ROM hacking sections.
Views: 88,483,928
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search 04-25-24 11:40 PM
Guest: Register | Login

0 users currently in ROM Hacking | 4 guests

Main - ROM Hacking - Lazy Shell - Rom Locking - Yay or Nay? New thread | New reply

Pages: 1 2

Should Lazy Shell have a Rom Locking feature?
Yay
Nay
Author stamp only
Multiple voting is not allowed. Changing your vote is allowed. 20 users have voted so far.

Omega45889
Posted on 02-03-08 09:33 AM Link | Quote | ID: 76144


Red Paratroopa
Level: 31

Posts: 23/178
EXP: 183074
Next: 2289

Since: 01-18-08

Last post: 5482 days
Last view: 4789 days
Ive finished designing the feature that would allow users to lock their roms to prevent others from editing it.

There are 2 options for locking,

1) Locked but viewable. The rom remains viewable and editable, it just cannot be saved.

2) Locked. The rom is locked and cannot be viewed.

Author stamp - The rom would be tagged with the Authors name and a timestamp indicating when it was published. This would require a password to edit.

It has been brought to my attention that some people may not even want this feature. In the past such a feature was to prevent theft of work, but these days that doesnt seem to be a problem, so maybe just the Author stamp would be a better idea.

Keep in mind that this model for locking the rom wouldnt be broken with just a simple hex edit. I doubt I would be able to break into a locked rom even knowing how it works.

Sukasa
Posted on 02-03-08 09:35 AM Link | Quote | ID: 76145


Red Birdo
Level: 92

Posts: 638/2112
EXP: 7689078
Next: 67859

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 4447 days
Last view: 3219 days
Make it an option, so that those people who don't want others to open the ROM can, those who just don't want the ROM altered can have it their way, and those who only want to stamp the ROM with their own name can do that as well.

Raccoon Sam
Posted on 02-03-08 12:14 PM Link | Quote | ID: 76154


Cobrat
Level: 56

Posts: 397/672
EXP: 1379975
Next: 18201

Since: 02-19-07
From: Hi

Last post: 3467 days
Last view: 2698 days
I am a supporter of Open Source technology, so no.
Even if you add a locking feature, someone is bound to figure out how to unlock the ROM (See RLM).

However, if you are going to add the feature despite my opinion, you should both, make the locking system actually good (i.e. not a one byte check), and have the editor lock hacks only with significant changes.

____________________


Omega45889
Posted on 02-03-08 01:50 PM Link | Quote | ID: 76162


Red Paratroopa
Level: 31

Posts: 24/178
EXP: 183074
Next: 2289

Since: 01-18-08

Last post: 5482 days
Last view: 4789 days
I bevieve I have devised a way to both have the security features, and open source the editor.

Also, the system ive worked out is actually pretty good. It involves private and public keys, SHA-1 cyphers, and hash checks. Id be very impressed if anyone found a way to break the system without modifying the editor. As far as I can see, the only way to break it would be to alter the editor to not check, and therein comes the problem of being able to still open source it. I think ive solved that though.

Ive already written all the code to handle encryption, but finishing it might not be worth the effort if people dont even want the feature.

blackhole89
Posted on 02-03-08 01:58 PM Link | Quote | ID: 76163


The Guardian
Moloch whose eyes are a thousand blind windows!
Level: 124

Posts: 1373/4196
EXP: 21532139
Next: 304462

Since: 02-19-07
From: Ithaca, NY, US

Last post: 471 days
Last view: 83 days



I'm for the insertion of both features as well, if only because ROM locking is a good way to deal with the always-present temptation "gnng, this puzzle is hard... bleh, I'll just look it up in the editor". Besides, I'm curious to see how long this will last compared to LM locking

____________________



boingboingsplat
Posted on 02-03-08 03:22 PM Link | Quote | ID: 76167


Giant Koopa
[PREFSTRING:wonderful bounciness]
Level: 74

Posts: 230/1292
EXP: 3633579
Next: 19965

Since: 07-23-07
From: Michicola

Last post: 4841 days
Last view: 4804 days
I'm going to have to say Author Stamp.

____________________
 

Remnic The Hedgehog
Posted on 02-03-08 05:42 PM Link | Quote | ID: 76173


Chasupa
Level: 56

Posts: 520/675
EXP: 1378956
Next: 19220

Since: 05-23-07
From: Kickapoo, Missouri

Last post: 5173 days
Last view: 5181 days

Ailure
Posted on 02-03-08 05:55 PM Link | Quote | ID: 76174

Hats
Steam Board2 group
Level: 121

Posts: 2249/3965
EXP: 19778375
Next: 278321

Since: 02-19-07
From: Sweden, Skåne

Last post: 3301 days
Last view: 2052 days
No, only because I'm against the concept of handling ROM hacks as they were some kind of Intellectual property... in a DRM way too. :/

____________________
AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org


troopa pride
Posted on 02-03-08 06:08 PM (rev. 2 of 02-03-08 06:10 PM) Link | Quote | ID: 76176


Koopa
Level: 26

Posts: 58/117
EXP: 99569
Next: 2706

Since: 05-15-07

Last post: 5730 days
Last view: 5567 days
I prefer both features.
Some people can use lazy shell as a guide!

For stuff such as open source though, there should be a trademark logo in the startup screen.

GreyMaria
Posted on 02-03-08 08:43 PM Link | Quote | ID: 76197

>implying even the Japanese understand the Japanese
Level: 105

Posts: 891/2851
EXP: 11920354
Next: 341906

Since: 07-13-07

Last post: 4497 days
Last view: 4466 days
Everything.

Except require the author stamp.

____________________
we're currently experiencing some technical difficulties

Arbe
Posted on 02-03-08 09:31 PM Link | Quote | ID: 76206

go away
Level: 86

Posts: 278/1788
EXP: 5987117
Next: 154990

Since: 02-23-07

Last post: 4969 days
Last view: 1538 days
I think it should have an author stamp and a rom lock. If a feature can be implemented, and you know at least a few people will use it, then do it.

Omega45889
Posted on 02-04-08 01:20 AM (rev. 2 of 02-04-08 01:22 AM) Link | Quote | ID: 76236


Red Paratroopa
Level: 31

Posts: 25/178
EXP: 183074
Next: 2289

Since: 01-18-08

Last post: 5482 days
Last view: 4789 days
Way to make it easy on me guys... a 5 - 4 - 5. What the hell am I supposed to do now?

Arbe
Posted on 02-04-08 01:41 AM Link | Quote | ID: 76251

go away
Level: 86

Posts: 286/1788
EXP: 5987117
Next: 154990

Since: 02-23-07

Last post: 4969 days
Last view: 1538 days
Implement it, idiot!

If anyone says don't, it's because they want to steal a hack.

Ailure
Posted on 02-04-08 01:44 AM Link | Quote | ID: 76252

Hats
Steam Board2 group
Level: 121

Posts: 2251/3965
EXP: 19778375
Next: 278321

Since: 02-19-07
From: Sweden, Skåne

Last post: 3301 days
Last view: 2052 days
Posted by ArBeWhat
Implement it, idiot!

If anyone says don't, it's because they want to steal a hack.
Hey hey, don't flame now.

And well, obviously most people are in favor of at least having a "Author stamp" into the game. So go ahead and implement that first I guess.

____________________
AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org


Arbe
Posted on 02-04-08 01:45 AM Link | Quote | ID: 76253

go away
Level: 86

Posts: 287/1788
EXP: 5987117
Next: 154990

Since: 02-23-07

Last post: 4969 days
Last view: 1538 days
Posted by Ailure
Posted by ArBeWhat
Implement it, idiot!

If anyone says don't, it's because they want to steal a hack.
Hey hey, don't flame now.

And well, obviously most people are in favor of at least having a "Author stamp" into the game. So go ahead and implement that first I guess.


Sorry. Well, yeah, like I said, someone, somewhere, will use it, so why not?

Omega45889
Posted on 02-04-08 02:33 AM Link | Quote | ID: 76256


Red Paratroopa
Level: 31

Posts: 26/178
EXP: 183074
Next: 2289

Since: 01-18-08

Last post: 5482 days
Last view: 4789 days

And well, obviously most people are in favor of at least having a "Author stamp" into the game. So go ahead and implement that first I guess.


Your right, I might work on that tonight.


Besides, I'm curious to see how long this will last compared to LM locking


Im tempted to implement it just to see that myself. Im not saying that it will never be broken, but I dont think itll be done anytime soon, and Im almost certain it will require the editor to be modified to just ignore the check.

Gil-Galad
Posted on 02-08-08 03:59 PM Link | Quote | ID: 76752


Goomba
Level: 13

Posts: 12/26
EXP: 10255
Next: 12

Since: 12-08-07

Last post: 5034 days
Last view: 5032 days
I'm not in favor of locking a rom with a password or encryption of some sort, etc. Some roms you may be able to do this if free space or padding at the end of a bank is available.

Usually I would not want to spend freespace for such a thing. Also, if there is no free space available, this action could comprimise the ROM and I would not like that.

Also I agree with other reasons for not locking a ROM. The ROM could be locked from being used in a certain editor but wouldn't prevent you from hacking the game in a hex editor or other applications, generally speaking. Unless the data has been rearranged to prevent other editors from editing the game.



pieguy1732
Posted on 02-08-08 05:18 PM Link | Quote | ID: 76758


Ptooie
Note: I wasn't here because I wasn't here, not because someone switched the 7 and the 3.
Level: 84

Posts: 492/1711
EXP: 5462339
Next: 199613

Since: 01-04-08

Last post: 5016 days
Last view: 4946 days
I think that you should put both in. If people don't want other people to steal their stuff, then there should be a way to protect it. Also, the author stamp is a way of making sure that people know who the author of the hack is.

____________________
"There are 3 types of people in this world: Those who can count and those who can't."
Neritic Net

Omega45889
Posted on 02-09-08 03:25 AM Link | Quote | ID: 76794


Red Paratroopa
Level: 31

Posts: 27/178
EXP: 183074
Next: 2289

Since: 01-18-08

Last post: 5482 days
Last view: 4789 days
Yeah, im almost done with the whole system.

Im not sure if Im going to make the Rom Locking features public. Ive never been a fan of DRM, but since it is so easy to copy material using Lazy Shell (ie. Export from one rom and import into another) it seemed like a good idea.

troopa pride
Posted on 02-09-08 03:51 AM (rev. 3 of 02-09-08 03:52 AM) Link | Quote | ID: 76795


Koopa
Level: 26

Posts: 69/117
EXP: 99569
Next: 2706

Since: 05-15-07

Last post: 5730 days
Last view: 5567 days
Posted by Omega45889
Yeah, im almost done with the whole system.


WOOOOOO0000000ooooooot

I can't wait to try out the editor

Perhaps a zelda rpg?
I am thinking of making a smrpg hack based off the Legend of Zelda Oracle of Seasons manga.

It'd be a good choice anyways.Why?The characters.They fit the actions the current smrpg characters do..

Link=Mario(Obviously)
Malo=Maple
Geno=The bird guy that rides link..
Bowser=Ricky
Peach=Din
Pages: 1 2


Main - ROM Hacking - Lazy Shell - Rom Locking - Yay or Nay? New thread | New reply

Acmlmboard 2.1+4δ (2023-01-15)
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al.

Page rendered in 0.029 seconds. (342KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 99, rows: 140/141, time: 0.019 seconds.