Points of Required Attention™
Please chime in on a proposed restructuring of the ROM hacking sections.
Views: 88,473,278
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search 04-24-24 12:20 AM
Guest: Register | Login

0 users currently in The Landfill | 1 guest | 1 bot

Main - The Landfill - regarding that bullshit earlier today II New thread | Thread closed

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Kles
Posted on 07-27-07 06:31 PM (rev. 2 of 07-27-07 06:32 PM) Link | Quote | ID: 58844


Level: 75

Posts: 1236/1301
EXP: 3716709
Next: 110195

Since: 02-19-07
From: Canada

Last post: 5480 days
Last view: 5474 days
Posted by Xkeeper
Actually, not a single thread in the staff forum actually describes what happened. There's only one that's comprised of 1% of staff wanting to know if anything's going to be done, and 99% of it Grey being a whining asshole because boo hoo I'm reading the staff forum.


Posted by Ailure
After a discussion between me, Acmlm, emuz and blackhole89 we decided to remove access of Xkeeper. Xk kept losing faith among us, and blackhole89, along with Acmlm decided to cut his access of the boards server space and database. Him trunctating the tables in both Acmlmwiki and[bullshit] Acmlmboard database only reinforced this.


This is all anybody who hasn't talked to them directly knows.

In short, because I lost my trust of blackhole89 and Ailure (and gee whiz, I wonder why) they decided oh noes.




Is that quote in relation to the thing that stag019 did?

And if so, why did they make that decision, just assuming it was you?

Xeogred
Posted on 07-27-07 06:49 PM Link | Quote | ID: 58850


Porcupo
Level: 40

Posts: 305/305
EXP: 421900
Next: 19409

Since: 02-19-07
From: Temple of Time

Last post: 6115 days
Last view: 6115 days
For the love of god will this place EVER CHANGE? You have got to be kidding me.

Its like the little interest I had left here was just shat on all over and thrown off a cliff.

Its not Xk or anyone but the damn community. Acmlm's WE KNOW DRAMA.

Tatrion
Posted on 07-27-07 09:12 PM Link | Quote | ID: 58892


Beezo
Level: 49

Posts: 427/477
EXP: 825141
Next: 58742

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 5880 days
Last view: 5861 days
Well, you know, I was using 1.php too. I didn't use a proxy or anything; I even made posts with it on. My IP address should be all over the server access logs things, I'm frankly surprised I was missed

stag wasn't the only one taking advantage of that page.

____________________


Xkeeper
Posted on 07-27-07 09:17 PM Link | Quote | ID: 58894


Level: 105

Posts: 2763/2846
EXP: 12025903
Next: 236357

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 6057 days
Last view: 2795 days
Posted by Tatrion
Well, you know, I was using 1.php too. I didn't use a proxy or anything; I even made posts with it on. My IP address should be all over the server access logs things, I'm frankly surprised I was missed

stag wasn't the only one taking advantage of that page.
I put very little faith in the honest efforts of Ailure and blackhole89 to actually check anything... you saw how much I had to yell and fight with Ailure just to get him to look at the damn thing.

I'm sure any attempt to view phpmyadmin wasn't looked for either, naturally, because obviously it as me that did the editing...


____________________
I dealt with it.

Ailure
Posted on 07-27-07 09:17 PM Link | Quote | ID: 58896

Hats
Steam Board2 group
Level: 121

Posts: 1316/3965
EXP: 19775267
Next: 281429

Since: 02-19-07
From: Sweden, Skåne

Last post: 3299 days
Last view: 2050 days
XK, you didn't tell me until like 14 hours ago.

:/

____________________
AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org


Xkeeper
Posted on 07-27-07 09:34 PM Link | Quote | ID: 58917


Level: 105

Posts: 2769/2846
EXP: 12025903
Next: 236357

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 6057 days
Last view: 2795 days
Because I told blackhole89, who supposedly had logs, proof, you-name-it flying out of his ass at an amazing rate proving I did it, and I challenged him to actually show ANY of it.

I only went after you because you came online then; blackhole89 mysteriously disappeared whenever anyone asked for it.

____________________
I dealt with it.

Ailure
Posted on 07-27-07 09:37 PM Link | Quote | ID: 58921

Hats
Steam Board2 group
Level: 121

Posts: 1317/3965
EXP: 19775267
Next: 281429

Since: 02-19-07
From: Sweden, Skåne

Last post: 3299 days
Last view: 2050 days
He was using some unreliable wireless while being on laptop. I don't think he went off on purpose like that, and from the sounds of it he had to go soon too from where he was.

____________________
AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org


Tweaker
Posted on 07-27-07 10:25 PM Link | Quote | ID: 58946


Red Koopa
Level: 28

Posts: 125/139
EXP: 129802
Next: 1536

Since: 02-19-07
From: Rochester, NY

Last post: 5792 days
Last view: 5699 days
It makes you think though, doesn't it? That he had irrefutable proof that Xkeeper was, indeed the culprit, that he had chatlogs, and that it was him without a shadow of a doubt... and yet one look into the server logs proves that it wasn't. Isn't that pretty awesome, you guys?

Blackhole didn't show any logs because there were none. He's full of shit, and he's obviously going to great lengths to get rid of Xkeeper. Not only are there mediocre admins running about, but there's also shady ones too. Is that really what you want to deal with on a daily basis?

____________________
Messenger info:
AIM: SonicTweaker
MSN: nibesto@gmail.com
GTalk: nibesto@gmail.com
Cool IRC Channels:
#retro | #cult | #acmlm

Cool Sites:
Sonic Retro | S2Beta | CulT | SGMC | Something Awful | HPZ | Hacking CulT | Acmlm's Board II

GreyMaria
Posted on 07-28-07 08:24 AM Link | Quote | ID: 59155

>implying even the Japanese understand the Japanese
Level: 105

Posts: 130/2851
EXP: 11918437
Next: 343823

Since: 07-13-07

Last post: 4495 days
Last view: 4464 days
I still think Acmlm sohuld have never let other people host him.

How fuckin' stupid do you get? You don't let people you can't trust with a chocolate-chip cookie host a massive message board with caring members!

____________________
we're currently experiencing some technical difficulties

Skreeny
Posted on 07-28-07 08:30 AM Link | Quote | ID: 59157


Cobrat
Level: 56

Posts: 434/653
EXP: 1321491
Next: 76685

Since: 02-21-07

Last post: 5338 days
Last view: 4839 days
...Except that the ones he couldn't trust evidently did what they did with his blessing. Oops?

The Kins
Posted on 07-28-07 08:48 AM Link | Quote | ID: 59159


Paratroopa
Level: 28

Posts: 123/140
EXP: 131205
Next: 133

Since: 02-19-07
From: AUSSIELAND

Last post: 5910 days
Last view: 5910 days
Guys, blackhole's OBVIOUSLY too busy finishing up Solar Soundtrack for 1.0 release to look into such fickle things as the truth.

And if he's not, he should probably get the fuck outta dodge.

Hiryuu
Posted on 07-29-07 06:13 AM Link | Quote | ID: 59290

Done.
Level: 79

Posts: 1446/1471
EXP: 4468691
Next: 110776

Since: 02-19-07
From: ???

Last post: 6084 days
Last view: 6076 days
I'm going down to Auuussiieeeelaahahahahaaand...

Ailure
Posted on 07-29-07 06:24 AM (rev. 2 of 07-29-07 06:25 AM) Link | Quote | ID: 59292

Hats
Steam Board2 group
Level: 121

Posts: 1353/3965
EXP: 19775267
Next: 281429

Since: 02-19-07
From: Sweden, Skåne

Last post: 3299 days
Last view: 2050 days
Posted by Tweaker
It makes you think though, doesn't it? That he had irrefutable proof that Xkeeper was, indeed the culprit, that he had chatlogs, and that it was him without a shadow of a doubt... and yet one look into the server logs proves that it wasn't. Isn't that pretty awesome, you guys?

[22:17] <blackhole89> I should get out now
[22:18] <Xkeeper> *111312210256» <11+blackhole89> I should get out now
[22:18] <Xkeeper> *111312200227» <12Xkeeper> so do you have any real proof?
[22:18] <Xkeeper> *111312210204» <12Xkeeper> I only ask because you seem to have claimed you had "logs" and other scary things to prove me wrong with
[22:19] <blackhole89> oh yeah, since Xk asked for this
[22:19] <blackhole89> there is no definite proof for him being the culprit of the more recent (citation etc.) attack

The attack was done around two hours before he said that. In other words, he never claimed he had proof, and even admitted that he didn't before he went offline.

____________________
AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org


Xkeeper
Posted on 07-29-07 06:26 AM Link | Quote | ID: 59293


Level: 105

Posts: 2800/2846
EXP: 12025903
Next: 236357

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 6057 days
Last view: 2795 days
Posted by Ailure
Posted by Tweaker
It makes you think though, doesn't it? That he had irrefutable proof that Xkeeper was, indeed the culprit, that he had chatlogs, and that it was him without a shadow of a doubt... and yet one look into the server logs proves that it wasn't. Isn't that pretty awesome, you guys?

[22:17] <blackhole89> I should get out now
[22:18] <Xkeeper> *111312210256» <11+blackhole89> I should get out now
[22:18] <Xkeeper> *111312200227» <12Xkeeper> so do you have any real proof?
[22:18] <Xkeeper> *111312210204» <12Xkeeper> I only ask because you seem to have claimed you had "logs" and other scary things to prove me wrong with
[22:19] <blackhole89> oh yeah, since Xk asked for this
[22:19] <blackhole89> there is no definite proof for him being the culprit of the more recent (citation etc.) attack

The attack was done around two hours before he said that. In other words, he never claimed he had proof, and even admitted that he didn't before he went off.
I'm waiting for someone to prove that wrong; many people heard him say otherwise.

Unfortunately I wasn't one of them (too busy paying attention elsewhere)... so I hope one notices this and slams that into the bullshit machine.

____________________
I dealt with it.

Ailure
Posted on 07-29-07 06:27 AM (rev. 2 of 07-29-07 06:30 AM) Link | Quote | ID: 59294

Hats
Steam Board2 group
Level: 121

Posts: 1354/3965
EXP: 19775267
Next: 281429

Since: 02-19-07
From: Sweden, Skåne

Last post: 3299 days
Last view: 2050 days
Well, it was the last thing blackhole89 said in the channel (before he went offline) according to my logs, unless I missed something during to disconnections I had now and then.

____________________
AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org


Tweaker
Posted on 07-29-07 07:16 AM (rev. 2 of 07-29-07 07:17 AM) Link | Quote | ID: 59303


Red Koopa
Level: 28

Posts: 128/139
EXP: 129802
Next: 1536

Since: 02-19-07
From: Rochester, NY

Last post: 5792 days
Last view: 5699 days
Posted by Ailure
Posted by Tweaker
It makes you think though, doesn't it? That he had irrefutable proof that Xkeeper was, indeed the culprit, that he had chatlogs, and that it was him without a shadow of a doubt... and yet one look into the server logs proves that it wasn't. Isn't that pretty awesome, you guys?

[22:17] <blackhole89> I should get out now
[22:18] <Xkeeper> *111312210256» <11+blackhole89> I should get out now
[22:18] <Xkeeper> *111312200227» <12Xkeeper> so do you have any real proof?
[22:18] <Xkeeper> *111312210204» <12Xkeeper> I only ask because you seem to have claimed you had "logs" and other scary things to prove me wrong with
[22:19] <blackhole89> oh yeah, since Xk asked for this
[22:19] <blackhole89> there is no definite proof for him being the culprit of the more recent (citation etc.) attack

The attack was done around two hours before he said that. In other words, he never claimed he had proof, and even admitted that he didn't before he went offline.

Yeah, he said that about an hour after he screamed at the top of his internet lungs "I'M BANNING XKEEPER HE DID IT I HAVE LOGS HE FUCKING DID IT JHFKLJHFGKLJGHSFLKgjhdflkjghdfsklgjhdslkgjhsdfglkjfhglksd;sdg"

Believe me, he only said that to get people off his back.

EDIT: And I'll get logs him saying that shit too, if you want.

____________________
Messenger info:
AIM: SonicTweaker
MSN: nibesto@gmail.com
GTalk: nibesto@gmail.com
Cool IRC Channels:
#retro | #cult | #acmlm

Cool Sites:
Sonic Retro | S2Beta | CulT | SGMC | Something Awful | HPZ | Hacking CulT | Acmlm's Board II

YD
Posted on 07-29-07 07:23 AM Link | Quote | ID: 59304


Porcupo
banned
Level: 40

Posts: 1/312
EXP: 430907
Next: 10402

Since: 07-29-07

Last post: 5910 days
Last view: 5881 days

Posted by Xeogred
For the love of god will this place EVER CHANGE? You have got to be kidding me.

Its like the little interest I had left here was just shat on all over and thrown off a cliff.

Its not Xk or anyone but the damn community. Acmlm's WE KNOW DRAMA.


____________________


Hiryuu
Posted on 07-29-07 07:41 AM Link | Quote | ID: 59306

Done.
Level: 79

Posts: 1447/1471
EXP: 4468691
Next: 110776

Since: 02-19-07
From: ???

Last post: 6084 days
Last view: 6076 days
This just keeps getting better by the minute.

Xkeeper
Posted on 07-29-07 07:42 AM (rev. 2 of 07-29-07 07:43 AM) Link | Quote | ID: 59307


Level: 105

Posts: 2801/2846
EXP: 12025903
Next: 236357

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 6057 days
Last view: 2795 days
Posted by YD
Posted by Xeogred
For the love of god will this place EVER CHANGE? You have got to be kidding me.

Its like the little interest I had left here was just shat on all over and thrown off a cliff.

Its not Xk or anyone but the damn community. Acmlm's WE KNOW DRAMA.

i wasn't aware you had interest in this place

yet here you are

i'll be damned

____________________
I dealt with it.

Danielle
Posted on 07-29-07 08:00 AM Link | Quote | ID: 59310


Buzzy Beetle
Level: 44

Posts: 372/383
EXP: 593695
Next: 17590

Since: 02-19-07
From: California

Last post: 5464 days
Last view: 5464 days
Posted by YD
Posted by Xeogred
For the love of god will this place EVER CHANGE? You have got to be kidding me.

Its like the little interest I had left here was just shat on all over and thrown off a cliff.

Its not Xk or anyone but the damn community. Acmlm's WE KNOW DRAMA.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


Main - The Landfill - regarding that bullshit earlier today II New thread | Thread closed

Acmlmboard 2.1+4δ (2023-01-15)
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al.

Page rendered in 0.029 seconds. (322KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 72, rows: 101/101, time: 0.018 seconds.