Points of Required Attention™
Smaghetti, a new Super Mario Advance 4 editor, is currently in development! Check out the thread HERE!

Please chime in on a proposed restructuring of the ROM hacking sections.
Views: 88,319,310
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search 03-29-24 12:44 PM
Guest: Register | Login

0 users currently in The Landfill | 3 guests | 1 bot

Main - The Landfill - regarding that bullshit earlier today II New thread | Thread closed

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Xkeeper
Posted on 07-27-07 07:23 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58659


Level: 105

Posts: 2733/2846
EXP: 12001495
Next: 260765

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 6032 days
Last view: 2769 days
mabye this time it won't be trashed

but moving along

I'm openly challenging blackhole89 to post what proof he thinks he has that I supposedly did it

because I'm sick and tired of your "it was Xkeeper, he did all of it" and then suddenly shutting up whenever someone asks for a server log or anything concrete

i'm sure this will be closed by Ailure anyway but hey let's try again

22:08'15" Xkeeper: hey
22:08'16" Xkeeper: question
22:08'21" Xkeeper: did you EVER look at the fucking apache logs
22:13'14" Ailure: Yes but i'm going to sleep
22:13'21" Xkeeper: of course you are
22:13'28" Xkeeper: you had 9 hours to look through the logs
22:13'32" Xkeeper: but you're going ot sleep just when I ask
22:13'32" Ailure: there's just a nice thunderstorm stopping me
22:13'38" Xkeeper: oh bull shit
22:13'44" Xkeeper: blackhole89 pulled this same bullshit

it isn't that hard to ctrl-f userpic/1.php you idiots

____________________
I dealt with it.

KP9000
Posted on 07-27-07 07:28 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58661


Boomboom

Level: 90

Posts: 91/1975
EXP: 6937888
Next: 250721

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 3552 days
Last view: 3176 days


I think xk's right, until anyone provides us with some concrete evidence, there's not really any reason to draw conclusions here.

____________________

Ailure
Posted on 07-27-07 07:28 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58662

Hats
Steam Board2 group
Level: 121

Posts: 1303/3965
EXP: 19735128
Next: 321568

Since: 02-19-07
From: Sweden, Skåne

Last post: 3273 days
Last view: 2024 days
I was just downloading that access log right now, which is why I didn't answer right away.

I found out the one guilty behind this, and it's not Xkeeper.

____________________
AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org


Xkeeper
Posted on 07-27-07 07:28 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58663


Level: 105

Posts: 2734/2846
EXP: 12001495
Next: 260765

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 6032 days
Last view: 2769 days
Posted by Ailure
I was just downloading that access log right now, which is why I didn't answer right away.

I found out the one guilty behind this, and it's not Xkeeper.
it's called a name

you forgot it

____________________
I dealt with it.

Ailure
Posted on 07-27-07 07:30 AM (rev. 2 of 07-27-07 07:31 AM) Link | Quote | ID: 58664

Hats
Steam Board2 group
Level: 121

Posts: 1304/3965
EXP: 19735128
Next: 321568

Since: 02-19-07
From: Sweden, Skåne

Last post: 3273 days
Last view: 2024 days
I was just gonna ban him before saying his name.

And oh, it's stag019.

____________________
AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org


Clockworkz
Posted on 07-27-07 07:36 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58666


Panser
Level: 42

Posts: 270/344
EXP: 504334
Next: 17028

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 5343 days
Last view: 5339 days
...
Huh. Well, this is interesting. Has stag ever pulled shit like this before?

____________________


Ailure
Posted on 07-27-07 07:38 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58667

Hats
Steam Board2 group
Level: 121

Posts: 1306/3965
EXP: 19735128
Next: 321568

Since: 02-19-07
From: Sweden, Skåne

Last post: 3273 days
Last view: 2024 days
From what I remember, yes.

____________________
AIM: gamefreak1337, MSN: Emil_sim@spray.se, XMPP: ailure@xmpp.kafuka.org


Clockworkz
Posted on 07-27-07 07:39 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58668


Panser
Level: 42

Posts: 271/344
EXP: 504334
Next: 17028

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 5343 days
Last view: 5339 days
Does that mean Xk might get some/all mod/admin powers back?
Provided of course, he wants them.

____________________


Doritokiller
Posted on 07-27-07 07:39 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58669


Spike
Level: 58

Posts: 681/709
EXP: 1491109
Next: 86437

Since: 03-01-07
From: California

Last post: 5976 days
Last view: 3002 days


Somehow, I just don't feel surprised. I was thinking it'd be some user that seems all nice and happy, but has this internal rage that's just building up as fast as a little douche's ego.

What I'm really interested in, though, is a motive.

____________________

kimi gakure ta yuuki wa OKKUSENMAN OKKUSENMAN
sugi sarishi kisetsu wa DORAMATIKKU











Randy53215
Posted on 07-27-07 08:22 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58676


Shyguy
Banned by request
Level: 22

Posts: 64/81
EXP: 57624
Next: 726

Since: 02-19-07
From: Greenfield, Wisconsin (U.S.A)

Last post: 6063 days
Last view: 6041 days
Ailure I think we need more threads like this. I'm serious I'm curious as to how the other members feel about this... since you ugh closed the other thread and the many others before that...

Shadic
Posted on 07-27-07 08:25 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58677


Buzzy Beetle
Level: 44

Posts: 327/376
EXP: 576316
Next: 34969

Since: 02-19-07
From: Washington

Last post: 5924 days
Last view: 5715 days

KP9000
Posted on 07-27-07 08:31 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58678


Boomboom

Level: 90

Posts: 93/1975
EXP: 6937888
Next: 250721

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 3552 days
Last view: 3176 days


I agree. The thread I made only got positive results, there was no reason to close it. I believe there is some animosity towards Xk that doesn't need to be there. If there is any kind of problems with the admins and Xk, then the board's members need to see it instead of the staff being so secretive about it.

____________________

Xkeeper
Posted on 07-27-07 08:31 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58679


Level: 105

Posts: 2736/2846
EXP: 12001495
Next: 260765

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 6032 days
Last view: 2769 days
Posted by KP9000
I agree. The thread I made only got positive results, there was no reason to close it. I believe there is some animosity towards Xk that doesn't need to be there. If there is any kind of problems with the admins and Xk, then the board's members need to see it instead of the staff being so secretive about it.
You name the thread, you get a copy of it.



____________________
I dealt with it.

Randy53215
Posted on 07-27-07 08:34 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58680


Shyguy
Banned by request
Level: 22

Posts: 65/81
EXP: 57624
Next: 726

Since: 02-19-07
From: Greenfield, Wisconsin (U.S.A)

Last post: 6063 days
Last view: 6041 days
Posted by Xkeeper
Posted by KP9000
I agree. The thread I made only got positive results, there was no reason to close it. I believe there is some animosity towards Xk that doesn't need to be there. If there is any kind of problems with the admins and Xk, then the board's members need to see it instead of the staff being so secretive about it.
You name the thread, you get a copy of it.




All of them!

Xkeeper
Posted on 07-27-07 08:36 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58681


Level: 105

Posts: 2737/2846
EXP: 12001495
Next: 260765

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 6032 days
Last view: 2769 days
Posted by Randy53215
Posted by Xkeeper
Posted by KP9000
I agree. The thread I made only got positive results, there was no reason to close it. I believe there is some animosity towards Xk that doesn't need to be there. If there is any kind of problems with the admins and Xk, then the board's members need to see it instead of the staff being so secretive about it.
You name the thread, you get a copy of it.




All of them!
Sorry, one at a time.
Current choices:

Staff:
- "Uh, guys" (currently renamed DRAMA LLAMA)
SAO:
- Sonicandtails/Xkeeper
- Tomguy
- knuck
- Zem
- phil
- misterj

____________________
I dealt with it.

KP9000
Posted on 07-27-07 08:40 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58683


Boomboom

Level: 90

Posts: 94/1975
EXP: 6937888
Next: 250721

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 3552 days
Last view: 3176 days


Posted by Xkeeper
Posted by KP9000
I agree. The thread I made only got positive results, there was no reason to close it. I believe there is some animosity towards Xk that doesn't need to be there. If there is any kind of problems with the admins and Xk, then the board's members need to see it instead of the staff being so secretive about it.
You name the thread, you get a copy of it.


A *thread*? The staff forum is probably chock full of it. I'd like to see some cold hard justification of why Xkeeper was removed from office.

____________________

Randy53215
Posted on 07-27-07 09:02 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58690


Shyguy
Banned by request
Level: 22

Posts: 66/81
EXP: 57624
Next: 726

Since: 02-19-07
From: Greenfield, Wisconsin (U.S.A)

Last post: 6063 days
Last view: 6041 days
Posted by KP9000
Posted by Xkeeper
Posted by KP9000
I agree. The thread I made only got positive results, there was no reason to close it. I believe there is some animosity towards Xk that doesn't need to be there. If there is any kind of problems with the admins and Xk, then the board's members need to see it instead of the staff being so secretive about it.
You name the thread, you get a copy of it.


A *thread*? The staff forum is probably chock full of it. I'd like to see some cold hard justification of why Xkeeper was removed from office.


Failure to retrieve.... aborting... 1... 2... 3... Goodbye

KP9000
Posted on 07-27-07 09:09 AM Link | Quote | ID: 58696


Boomboom

Level: 90

Posts: 96/1975
EXP: 6937888
Next: 250721

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 3552 days
Last view: 3176 days


Posted by Randy53215
Posted by KP9000
Posted by Xkeeper
Posted by KP9000
I agree. The thread I made only got positive results, there was no reason to close it. I believe there is some animosity towards Xk that doesn't need to be there. If there is any kind of problems with the admins and Xk, then the board's members need to see it instead of the staff being so secretive about it.
You name the thread, you get a copy of it.


A *thread*? The staff forum is probably chock full of it. I'd like to see some cold hard justification of why Xkeeper was removed from office.
Failure to retrieve.... aborting... 1... 2... 3... Goodbye
I understand it's pretty late at night, and people are probably too "tired" to go fetch some links or logs. So, we'll see if anyone comes up with anything tomorrow. I assume anything that shows up will be minuscule little bickerings not worth mentioning at all.

____________________

Xkeeper
Posted on 07-27-07 10:57 AM (rev. 2 of 07-27-07 10:57 AM) Link | Quote | ID: 58736


Level: 105

Posts: 2743/2846
EXP: 12001495
Next: 260765

Since: 02-19-07

Last post: 6032 days
Last view: 2769 days
Actually, not a single thread in the staff forum actually describes what happened. There's only one that's comprised of 1% of staff wanting to know if anything's going to be done, and 99% of it Grey being a whining asshole because boo hoo I'm reading the staff forum.


Posted by Ailure
After a discussion between me, Acmlm, emuz and blackhole89 we decided to remove access of Xkeeper. Xk kept losing faith among us, and blackhole89, along with Acmlm decided to cut his access of the boards server space and database. Him trunctating the tables in both Acmlmwiki and[bullshit] Acmlmboard database only reinforced this.


This is all anybody who hasn't talked to them directly knows.

In short, because I lost my trust of blackhole89 and Ailure (and gee whiz, I wonder why) they decided oh noes.



____________________
I dealt with it.

The Kins
Posted on 07-27-07 01:30 PM Link | Quote | ID: 58830


Paratroopa
Level: 28

Posts: 121/140
EXP: 130938
Next: 400

Since: 02-19-07
From: AUSSIELAND

Last post: 5885 days
Last view: 5885 days
Well GEE GOLLY GOSH FUCK-ME WILLIKERS, people blaming xk for the fuckup of the week? Colour me as surprised as a five year old walking in on a bukkake party!
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


Main - The Landfill - regarding that bullshit earlier today II New thread | Thread closed

Acmlmboard 2.1+4δ (2023-01-15)
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al.

Page rendered in 0.028 seconds. (322KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 92, rows: 121/121, time: 0.018 seconds.