| |||
Views: 88,479,310 |
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search | 04-25-24 12:05 AM |
|
Guest: Register | Login |
0 users currently in The Landfill | 3 guests |
Main - The Landfill - Dumb site no. 1! GO! | New thread | Thread closed |
Randy53215 |
| ||
Shyguy Banned by request Level: 22 Posts: 56/81 EXP: 57746 Next: 604 Since: 02-19-07 From: Greenfield, Wisconsin (U.S.A) Last post: 6089 days Last view: 6067 days |
Posted by Flan Someone sees where I am going with this... |
Thexare Blademoon |
| ||
Cheep-cheep Level: 32 Posts: 168/180 EXP: 191286 Next: 15156 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 5963 days Last view: 5955 days |
Ladies and gentlemen, he's agreeing with yet another SamuraiX rereg.
That's all I think I need to say. |
Trax |
| ||
Yellow Stalfos Level: 71 Posts: 29/1145 EXP: 3035437 Next: 131677 Since: 07-06-07 From: Québec Last post: 3625 days Last view: 2877 days |
Posted by Flan What you said is not necessarily wrong, it's just one of many factors that compose the question. At best, it's incomplete. If you are more industry-oriented, what you said goes with this logic. Of course, I have my own notion of taxes, and probably everyone who think a minimum have his own variant on the subject... Usually, the term "taxes" refers to one of many dispositions to collect the financial means for public services. Thus, trying to make taxes "fairer" is more of a question of social fairness. You can also ask yourself "who profits?". If the companies profit, then it's a more corporative intent. If the citizens profit, then it's a more social intent. If only a small group of people profits from such measures, then it's an elitist intent... |
Main - The Landfill - Dumb site no. 1! GO! | New thread | Thread closed |
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al. |
MySQL - queries: 47, rows: 58/59, time: 0.025 seconds. |