| |||
Views: 88,481,173 |
Main | FAQ | Uploader | IRC chat | Radio | Memberlist | Active users | Latest posts | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Search | 04-25-24 09:53 AM |
|
Guest: Register | Login |
0 users currently in The Landfill | 3 guests |
Main - The Landfill - The legendary thread ID 1. | New thread | Thread closed |
Kattwah |
| ||
Fuzzy Level: 60 Posts: 141/778 EXP: 1719030 Next: 53748 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 2489 days Last view: 1650 days |
Blah. I still think that the fonts on this board a a notch too small
Shall I take a screenshot of my standard? Maybe. All I know is most of the not-post text is very... quite small =/ (Especially the sidebar text... that stuff is borderline tiny) ____________________ |
Kailieann |
| ||
Red Cheep-cheep Level: 34 Posts: 93/217 EXP: 253215 Next: 436 Since: 02-19-07 From: Beyond Last post: 5636 days Last view: 5636 days |
So change the font size. |
Xkeeper |
| ||
Level: 105 Posts: 336/2846 EXP: 12027243 Next: 235017 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6059 days Last view: 2796 days |
Posted by Kattwah ____________________ I dealt with it. |
Kattwah |
| ||
Fuzzy Level: 60 Posts: 143/778 EXP: 1719030 Next: 53748 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 2489 days Last view: 1650 days |
...
Well... that wasnt there the last time I checked... It was all "smallest, small, normal, large, largest" and what not ;( ____________________ |
Xkeeper |
| ||
Level: 105 Posts: 339/2846 EXP: 12027243 Next: 235017 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6059 days Last view: 2796 days |
So you pick the next biggest size, duh ____________________ I dealt with it. |
Kattwah |
| ||
Fuzzy Level: 60 Posts: 144/778 EXP: 1719030 Next: 53748 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 2489 days Last view: 1650 days |
Posted by XkeeperBut that system didnt ACTUALLY affect the sidebar size ____________________ |
Danielle |
| ||
Buzzy Beetle Level: 44 Posts: 87/383 EXP: 593761 Next: 17524 Since: 02-19-07 From: California Last post: 5466 days Last view: 5466 days |
The font is smaller, but not too small to read. I like it. I'm OCD that way or something. |
Nicole |
| ||
Mole Level: 43 Posts: 169/363 EXP: 547843 Next: 17203 Since: 02-19-07 From: Massachusetts/Virginia Last post: 4349 days Last view: 3327 days |
|
Kattwah |
| ||
Fuzzy Level: 60 Posts: 146/778 EXP: 1719030 Next: 53748 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 2489 days Last view: 1650 days |
Posted by ImajinThats exactly what was going on with mine ____________________ |
fabio |
| ||
Level: 65 Posts: 90/945 EXP: 2301225 Next: 34403 Since: 02-19-07 From: Texas Last post: 6030 days Last view: 5541 days |
Posted by KattwahPosted by ImajinThats exactly what was going on with mine Good thing I'm not the only one. I had to increase the text size in Firefox so that I could click on the edit profile link. I had the font size at 12 before switching it to something much bigger. |
Kles |
| ||
Level: 75 Posts: 256/1301 EXP: 3717123 Next: 109781 Since: 02-19-07 From: Canada |
Am I the only one who really likes the default the most? |
Xkeeper |
| ||
Level: 105 Posts: 345/2846 EXP: 12027243 Next: 235017 Since: 02-19-07 Last post: 6059 days Last view: 2796 days |
Posted by KlesI'm currently using 75, which is the default, so no Though, admittedly, 999 is pretty funny ____________________ I dealt with it. |
Kernal |
| ||
Gone Level: 88 Posts: 60/1881 EXP: 6461654 Next: 189010 Since: 02-20-07 Last post: 6145 days Last view: 6136 days |
What exactly does the number represent? Like if my font setting is 80, what is that? It's certainly not a point size or number of pixels... |
Acmlm |
| ||
Flurry Level: 37 Posts: 31/251 EXP: 315010 Next: 23243 Since: 02-19-07 From: Mirabel, Québec, Canada Last post: 6179 days Last view: 1812 days |
Flurry #&postrank& It's not too obvious but it's in % units and goes there:
< Now why the default setting is 75 and not 100, it just came up that way ... 100% was too big, and scaling down everything to make it work wasn't as simple as it could seem, so I just left it like that I can still get each of the 5 predefined sizes Xkeeper set up, using those values: - Smallest = 60 - Small = 70 (what I use, and what was there at first, a little small for 1280x1024 but still perfectly readable) - Normal = 75 - Large = 90 - Largest = 100 I just made it this way so the font size could be changed without touching the .css, as Xkeeper's way had a separate one for each size and that'd have complicated things if we add more color schemes later ____________________ |
Katelyn |
| ||
beh Level: 86 Posts: 61/1816 EXP: 6129392 Next: 12715 Since: 02-21-07 Last post: 6145 days Last view: 6145 days |
I should try 15 or some really low number and see how hard it is to browse xd |
Kernal |
| ||
Gone Level: 88 Posts: 61/1881 EXP: 6461654 Next: 189010 Since: 02-20-07 Last post: 6145 days Last view: 6136 days |
Yeah, or 1. Would the text just be one pixel high? Or completely invisible? |
Katelyn |
| ||
beh Level: 86 Posts: 63/1816 EXP: 6129392 Next: 12715 Since: 02-21-07 Last post: 6145 days Last view: 6145 days |
Wow, that's really tiny... |
Kles |
| ||
Level: 75 Posts: 273/1301 EXP: 3717123 Next: 109781 Since: 02-19-07 From: Canada |
The text size mod should have a constant size, that way someone can't accidentally set it so small that they can't change it back.
(yes, I realize back works but if that option were to somehow not be possible, then they're fucked) |
Kernal |
| ||
Gone Level: 88 Posts: 69/1881 EXP: 6461654 Next: 189010 Since: 02-20-07 Last post: 6145 days Last view: 6136 days |
Or just a minimum size, although computer-savvy individuals would know to use Ctrl-scrollwheel temporarily if they accidentally typed 7 instead of 70. |
Stifu |
| ||
Cobrat Level: 56 Posts: 14/666 EXP: 1361179 Next: 36997 Since: 02-22-07 Last post: 684 days Last view: 306 days |
Posted by Kles It's also possible to change the font size in the browser... If someone makes his font size too small and really can't manage to get it back to normal, then I'd see that as natural selection. |
Main - The Landfill - The legendary thread ID 1. | New thread | Thread closed |
© 2005-2023 Acmlm, blackhole89, Xkeeper et al. |
MySQL - queries: 77, rows: 105/106, time: 0.026 seconds. |