Originally posted by Apofisu

---

Originally posted by Tarale

---

Like Zoloft for example. It's an SSRI, it's prescribed for the treatment of Depression. Even if you continue to exercise, and eat the same as you always have, you're very likely to put on weight with it though.

---

Bullshit. I've been on it for years. Still 117lbs.

---

Originally posted by Cruel Lameness

---

There are good things that can result from a high-consumption of sweets. It's good for the economy; more money for the snack companies.

---

Originally posted by Thoughtless

---

Originally posted by Xkeeper

---

---

You have.

---

Originally posted by neotransotaku

---

my gf will most likely disapprove but why not

---

Originally posted by Acmlm

---

Just looked at the URL now ... that's definitely a big jump since the last time I saw it, those bots sure are obsessed

... now let's just hope they'll never figure out what's blocking them

---

Originally posted by Prince Kassad

---

Originally posted by windwaker

---

How do they even work?

---

They look around the internet for message boards (from a list probably), register, and spam. The spambots always filling in a home page is what gets them automatically banned.

Originally posted by windwaker

---

They can't possibly have unique code in them for Acmlm's, can they?

---

Sure they can, but most programmers don't care about one board when there are tons of other ones around.

---

Originally posted by Tarale

---

Originally posted by windwaker

---

I don't really see the point of this thread anymore. It's really just "don't make fun of the obese ", and it has nothing to do with world affairs or debate, really (if there's anti-fat legislation anywhere, please point it out).

---

No, there isn't any legislation as such, but schools are starting to change things like their cafeteria / canteen stuff because of things like this.

And there are calls in Australia for our politicians to lose weight because they are being a bad role model for kids

---

Originally posted by Xkeeper

---

Originally posted by Tarale

---

Just a note -- if you suddenly drop the amount of calories you eat, the human body thinks you are starving yourself -- or in a famine -- and takes action. It holds on to bodyfat and stores more in case the famine goes on for a while, or happens again.

---

This explains an awful lot of one o fthe reasons behind my latest seeming inability to function properly.

(namely, my diet went from "somewhat regular ramen noodles and sandwiches three meals a day" to "almost nothing but occasionally leftovers or the strawberry college smoothie")

---

Originally posted by Lilmario

---

...

...

...I'm so ashamed.

---

Originally posted by Lilmario

---

How the fuck would you know?

Besides I have some sort of proof, aim me or something

---

Originally posted by ||bass

---

It doesn't matter because if you read the actual article, the president ISN'T pardoning himself. In this case, Bush would be reciving a CONGRESSIONAL pardon, not a presidential one.

---

Originally posted by ||bass

---

1: Don't give a shit either way.

---

Originally posted by Silvershield

---

Originally posted by windwaker

---

NOTHING about US law should be sacred.

---

Marriage existed as a sacred institution long before the laws of America were a twinkle in the Founding Fathers' eyes, or before Columbus even stepped onto his ship to seek the Indies; we as Americans did not invent marriage, and we cannot alter its character by declaring it an entirely secular insitution. In any case, though, I made it quite clear that I don't have a set opinion on the matter, so don't jump all over me as if I'm your enemy.

Wow, you see, I just installed this thing called lololol 2.0 RC, it just came out, and it has spell checking. I forgot to turn it off, but wow, look what I found. I thought "their" was the only spelling mistake in your 300+ posts? Wrong. "Their" isn't a spelling mistake, you used the wrong word. However, you did spell "institution" incorrectly. How embarrassing, considering your, you know, next sentence:

Originally posted by windwaker

---

First of all, it's not "their", it's "there".

---

Congratulations on discovering probably the single spelling mistake that you will find in my 300+ posts. I'm glad you used it to your advantage.

tool.

Originally posted by windwaker

---

If you can't use/spell even the simplest homophones correctly, who are you to say that a fetus is a "distinct life"?

---

Because the ability to spell correctly is a prerequisite for being able to make decisions regarding morality.

Well, spelling, not being totally arrogant/ironic, the list goes on.

Originally posted by windwaker

---

But, at least you aren't a hipocrit like a lot of "pro-life"-ers: [emphasis mine]

---

As stated, how "eyronic."

Originally posted by windwaker

---

Good. Everyone can have an opinion about what's wrong or not, and lying, for instance, isn't illegal. But alot more people should think about the consequences of what a law would do (that's you bass), rather than just saying "ABORTION IS WRONG AND IF IT IS ILLEGAL PEOPLE WON'T GET ABORTIONS". This is why the War on Drugs is failing, and prohibition failed before it.

---

First of all, don't patronize me. Secondly, lying isn't illegal because it does not directly murder an unborn child. Apples and oranges here.

Perhaps I overestimated you. Lying isn't illegal because YOU CAN'T MODERATE LYING. No one's going to be able to arrest people for lying.

I'll patronize you until you prove that you can handle these concepts without my help. You see, if abortions become illegal, people are just going to get abortions by paying off doctors. Very similar to how people get medical marijuana licenses today. See how I made a correlation between the two?

I only support the idea of instituting programs to offer alternatives to abortion, rather than simply outlawing it, because I'm not out to hurt pregnant women but to protect their unborn children. Outlawing abortion leaves a pregnant woman with no real alternative that does not injure the child, while improving the situation with birth control, adoption programs, etc can prevent or safely solve the problem.

Is semen an unborn child? Is it wrong to use condoms? The catholic church thinks so. Some people think a fetus isn't a living thing. Some people think contraceptives are sinful. Who are YOU, Mr. "I spell great except this one time", to draw this line?

Originally posted by blackhole89

---

Have the distinct lives in mind before washing your hands with that anti-bacterial soap next time.

---

I didn't know that millions of tiny humans lived on my hands. I'll never bathe again, because I might risk compromising those microscopic human beings whose lives are of value.

I for one, am highly offended by you saying this. How can you compare a sacred living thing to bacteria?

---

Originally posted by Silvershield

---

Originally posted by windwaker

---

With that said, I'll respect the moderator's wishes and sit this thread out for a bit until I feel like I can speak civilly without being insulted.

---

---

Originally posted by ||bass

---

Here's the line:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Below the line, we are now in the no bullshit zone.

---