![]() |
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | ACS | Stats | Color Chart | Search | Photo album |
|
| | |||
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - - Posts by Tauwasser |
| Pages: 1 2 3 |
| User | Post | ||
|
Tauwasser Red Goomba Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6001 days Last view: 5922 days |
| ||
Originally posted by DarkSlaya Nono--noooo. That's all garbage. We tried that line of arguing a page ago. That won't work... nooo >< Originally posted by Silvershield That's very righteous of you to say. Dolphins for example are a very intelligent and sentient species as studies have shown. Originally posted by Silvershield I never said equivalence anywhere. Don't twist my words. Feeling somewhat empathetic for something or -one isn't the same as feeling of equivalence. Originally posted by Silvershield So you're saying you can perceive how a foetus would feel inside its mother womb getting slaughtered? Aside from the fact, that it is unable to feel because nervous strains aren't built up when abortions commonly take place, how so? And you do know, when abortion didn't exist, people would go back and do shove a hanger in there until everything is smooched enough to be put in a smoothie, don't you? Originally posted by Silvershield Why? Where is the difference? Goddammit, a dog has feelings of pain, too. Why is it different from abusing a human when you abuse a dog? I don't see the difference in there. I just see how the world works and go "Well, I don't necessarily need to care." Else, I couldn't stand living in this place. cYa, Tauwasser |
|||
|
Tauwasser Red Goomba Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6001 days Last view: 5922 days |
| ||
Originally posted by Silvershield My point being, that in the end, I for one would prefer the clinical way to abort a foetus rather than having women staggering with hangers to kill it. That's all. Originally posted by Silvershield I do understand what you're saying. It just doesn't make any sense. You say that no animal deserves the same consideration as a human because they are "lower species". That won't fit with your stance on abortion, because it can be seen pretty much as the same thing. It's not a human yet, so it certainly according to you must be lower. Then why would anyone have to consider it with like rights as humans'? Originally posted by Silvershield And hopefully it stays that way and conservative people like you don't take over the world. I would definitely hate to see a good solution to this problem (in the clinical sense at least) get wiped out because some jerks with only Jesus and how he loves all his children on their minds have the rights to say what'll happen. You see such prats every day in the American Congress (though that should've hopefully changed now). Oh, and the stuff about absolutes ("right"/"wrong") can't be left at that, no matter what. I mean, how dare you judge other culture's understanding of what's right and wrong? You simply shouldn't! You argue that people who got raised with a special mindset wouldn't kill another human. However, your approach should be a human who doesn't know right from wrong. He would certainly do it. This can be seen in little kids nowadays. When their parents don't teach them something well, e.g. that stealing is labeled "bad", then kids will definitely at some point think it's their right to steal stuff. It really is all about the upbringing how you think in such situations. Nothing more, nothing less. The little kids in that tribe are never going to get to know (=accept) your morals or mindset and vice versa. cYa, Tauwasser (edited by Tauwasser on 11-12-06 06:04 PM) |
|||
|
Tauwasser Red Goomba Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6001 days Last view: 5922 days |
| ||
Please elaborate then.
cYa, Tauwasser |
|||
|
Tauwasser Red Goomba Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6001 days Last view: 5922 days |
| ||
| Well, you didn't answer though. The link contained nothing I was concerned about. You said I could show you any living (or once-living) thing and you could tell if it was human or not. You failed that test miserably.
So. Another anaology: There's a man in your custody that knows the code to a secret bunker where your family is and dies right now. Would it be immoral to torture him to get the code and save a few lives? Originally posted by Silvershield But obviously they don't. They invade other countries to rape their natural goods as well as other things and leave nothing but atrocity behind. Your argument is somewhat broken. cYa, Tauwasser (edited by Tauwasser on 11-15-06 06:24 AM) |
|||
|
Tauwasser Red Goomba Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6001 days Last view: 5922 days |
| ||
Originally posted by n3g-Z3r0 theory Well, sure as hell your mom wouldn't have got a permit. Look at the retarded way you write, sir :| On a side-note. "To know" or "to get to know" in the bible is often used as a wording for having sex with somebody. The people of Sodom all wanted to get to know the stranger, which meant they wanted to participate in buttsexuous activities. That's why Gawd boiled them to ashes or stone statues or whatever. So in my opinion, it's not a good wording. cYa, Tauwasser |
|||
|
Tauwasser Red Goomba Since: 11-19-05 Last post: 6001 days Last view: 5922 days |
| ||
| Hi there,
yeah, it's me again. Actually, I just wanna contribute something here. But yeah, basically, I need approval to do that, funny as is. cYa, Tauwasser |
| Pages: 1 2 3 |
| Acmlm's Board - I3 Archive - - Posts by Tauwasser |